Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wanna know what peoples opinions are on the r32 veilside kit

post-65327-1249538785_thumb.jpg

post-65327-1249539067_thumb.jpg

post-65327-1249539107_thumb.jpg

I have already purchased it second hand its a genuine item and personally i like a little rice with my steak but is this going a bit over the top??

and yes the wing looks freakn stoopid i know :P ... i might use it as a towel rack :(:(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/282235-r32-veilside-kit-yay-or-nay/
Share on other sites

It's better then some other Veilside bodykits for the R32.

But still I would not have taken it.

The Kit you got there is the CI Model.

I would have taken the EIII Model as it is basically the Nismo Bodykit with over fender rear guards but also keep the stock rear bar.

The VeilSide CI kit is either a love or hate statement.

I have one on mine (sedan) and I get a lot of comments about how nice it looks.

In the end man, you have to live with it and if people don't like it, too bad, so sad.

As long as it floats your boat then go with it.

i dont like them, its to ricey for me, especially that spoiler. GTR front bar and some sideskirts do it for me, but hey if u like it, theres alot of others who do aswell :P

Edited by r32na

yea na i knew just asking would spark a barrage of negative comments,ah too late now though but please dont worry guys please because il change everyones mind about this kit...it will be loved!!!!

Especially after its new bright gloss yeallow paint job with green and pink metal flake

SHIBAAAAAAMMMMM!!!

:P:laugh::)

:sick::sick::/

:sick:

I have that kit on my 32 and I dislike the front bumper, wish I had cash to change it. The side skirts from the kit, however, are awesome. Love the way they curve in at the rear, gives the rear quarters a wider look.

One thing I'll say about the bumper is it's a pain in the arse to clean. You'll find the lower corners behind the swoopy part retains a lot of crap from the road.

Edited by Mark_McQ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, the closest base tune available was for the GTT, I went with that and made all the logical changes I could find to convert it to Naturally Aspirated. It will rev fine in Neutral to redline but it will be cutting nearly 50% fuel the whole way.  If I let it tune the fuel map to start with that much less fuel it wont run right and has a hard time applying corrections.  These 50% cuts are with a fuel map already about half of what the GTT tune had.  I was having a whole lot of bogging when applying any throttle but seem to have fixed that for no load situations with very aggressive transient throttle settings. I made the corrections to my injectors with data I found for them online, FBCJC100 flowing 306cc.  I'll have to look to see if I can find the Cam section. I have the Bosch 4.9 from Haltech. My manifold pressure when watching it live is always in -5.9 psi/inHg
    • Hi My Tokico BM50 Brake master cylinder has a leak from the hole between the two outlets (M10x1) for brake pipes, I have attached a photo. Can anyone tell me what that hole is and what has failed to allow brake fluid to escape from it, I have looked on line and asked questions on UK forums but can not find the answer, if anyone can enlighten me I would be most grateful.
    • It will be a software setting. I don't believe many on here ever used AEM. And they're now a discontinued product,that's really hard to find any easy answers on. If it were Link or Haltech, someone would be able to just send you a ECU file though.
    • Yes sir am asking is there possible way from aem tuner from wiring pins 
    • Have you checked cam to crank timing and confirmed balancer marks are correct?
×
×
  • Create New...