Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

lol i can afford an r33 gtst, yet I bought an R32 gts and yes I am upgrading its internals to an R33 GTSt. And yes I have made every single one of those comments in the past, cept maybe that poser comment, it sounds too fast n furious for my vocab.

Its like asking sum1 to choose between a new mustang and a Shelby GT500... my personal preference says Shelby GT500, even though its older, outdated and less powerful.

You may not have to come to terms that some people might not see your car as godsend but please don't patronise or mock my intelligence on behalf of my personal tastes. I would simply choose an r32 over an r33 because that's the way I feel. Most people you'll find are biased, they don't hate your car, most people on this forum view all skylines as equal, and under the bonnet they mostly are.

Pantae: All of the R33 range comes with digital climate control as far as im aware, ive never seen nor been in one that hasnt.

and even if the r32s were continued to 1994, they were continued unchanged.

The r33 interior and general mechanics are newer/more engineered compared to 32s.

As for power to weight?

SR20DET has 153KW stock, at 1200kg = 7.84kw per KG

RB25DET has 187KW stock, at 1400kg = 7.48kw per KG

Very little difference.

There all good cars, but at the end of the day, if i had the choice between r32, s13 or R33.

I know which ide choose :uh-huh: :uh-huh:

ive seen sum really nice R32s and ive seen some really nice R33s

but then i have seen some really ugly R32s and R33s

i have always luved R32s and thats why i own one

yea i got it dirt cheap but i still wouldnt have got an R33 over the R32 unless it was a GTR

i luv all GTRs its just the GTS's where i prefer one model over the other and i would have to say i perfer the R32

im a small guy and i feel so much smaller in a bigger car thats just another reason i prefer the R32 :D

and to be quite honest im not a huge fan of all the modern interiors i prefer something simple, straight, not too many different panels just something basic

i think is far from a VN commonwhore i luv the idea of have just the indicator on a stalk and the rest on the console i cant stand an over crowded stalk

just my 2c

and even if the r32s were continued to 1994, they were continued unchanged.

The r33 interior and general mechanics are newer/more engineered compared to 32s.  

As for power to weight?  

SR20DET has 153KW stock, at 1200kg = 7.84kw per KG  

RB25DET has 187KW stock, at 1400kg = 7.48kw per KG

Very little difference.  

why did u use the SR20 not the RB20 here?.... i think i'm getting lost in this thread... too many people worried about what everyone else thinks rather than they're own personal preference....

lol its become an R33 vs the rest of the world thing. this threads become more of a raging out thread than anything constructive... with all the name calling and puttting down of each others cars.

lets revell in the fact that we all have twin cam multivalve turbo 6's, 4spot brakes, decent suspension, power everything and a set of tail lights everyone this side of a ferrari is jealous of.

oh, & some of us have an electronic front spoiler (lol)

why did u use the SR20 not the RB20 here?.... i think i'm getting lost in this thread... too many people worried about what everyone else thinks rather than they're own personal preference....

Not only that, but both the weight and power figures are wrong. One other thing too - I think you meant kg/kw not kw/kg cos we'd have some ridiculously high powered cars with the figures you listed :D

Anyway, iIt's 184kW and 1360kg (using the 93 GTS25t weight cos that's what I have).

This makes a ratio of 7.39kg/kW - which still illustrates your point anyway :).

As for power to weight?  

SR20DET has 153KW stock, at 1200kg = 7.84kw per KG  

RB25DET has 187KW stock, at 1400kg = 7.48kw per KG

Very little difference.  

There all good cars, but at the end of the day, if i had the choice between r32, s13 or R33.  

I know which ide choose  :uh-huh: :uh-huh:

Who ever leaves there car stock??? Its like some twit saying the Rb25det has more protential then a Sr20. To those people who think that, they haven't driven a car with serious balls. Both motors have the protential to be undrivable.

I've seen a subzero 180sx fry its wheels in 3rd and a s15 fry them them thru 3rd to 4th while both cars are all over the road. Witnessed a r33 almost take out a guard rail after they gave it a boot @ 120km/h. In addition, a mates r32 gtst with rb26 has no problem smoking the wheels @ 120

Anyway, this topic has been played out too much. We all know a R33 looks like a Magna. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...