Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

here are the top 10 most frequent posters in Spotted!!

1) leech_ - 570

2) Terminal - 506

3) Bluprint - 379

4) Gus- - 370

5) Shell - 353

6) Veilside R33 - 335

7) SkyGTRline - 306

8) MIVEC - 283

9) sigsputnik - 263

10) LTSJayce - 261

yes i scrolled through 533 pages and counted them all

Edited by Ex!$t3nZ
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/532/#findComment-4367120
Share on other sites

here are the top 10 most frequent posters in Spotted!!

1) leech_ - 570

2) Terminal - 506

3) Bluprint - 379

4) Gus- - 370

5) Shell - 353

6) Veilside R33 - 335

7) SkyGTRline - 306

8) MIVEC - 283

9) sigsputnik - 263

10) LTSJayce - 261

yes i scrolled through 533 pages and counted them all

Whoa dude you need a hobbie :P

Makes you think though, Leech hasnt been on here for at least a year, Veilside hasnt posted for ages and neither have Terminal or skyGTRline... :happy:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/532/#findComment-4367680
Share on other sites

Spotted that Black 33 with the high rear wing AGAIN. I havent met him and his mate personally but to me they look and drive the car like tossers. If your on the forums use a booster seat dude, think about how silly you look in the cap and drive smarter.

If you know this guy have a word to him please he makes me angry! I would like to just ignore but he's p!ss!ng me off and I feel like taking his skyline off him.

PS. He'sgenerally in the bonython - chisolm area when I see the car.

Edited by Sinista32
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/532/#findComment-4368464
Share on other sites

Spotted what I think was a white R34 GT-T last night while making a turn off the parkway onto hindmarsh 10pm . just incase your here I wasn't giving you an evil eye, was squinting trying to work out what car it was haha.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/532/#findComment-4368659
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...