Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Spotted an R32 GTR past theodore onto the monaro this morning. very nice!

Spotted two maroon r33's yesterday on the monaro, one s2 turning off the Queanbo and a s1 behind me most of the monaro (I was in my sis's pulsar - which i forgot to take the P plates off by the way....)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/577/#findComment-4787133
Share on other sites

JD travelling in style to work this morning. I was in such a daze this morning, saw the waving and my mind said yep, JD, wave back... My hand took an extra minute to react...

You went through the lights at Theodore while I was waiting to turn, and it only took me about 5 K's to catch up :D

The old diesel ute has been called many things (especially the time it broke down halfway up the Clyde), but stylish isn't one of them.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/577/#findComment-4787393
Share on other sites

You went through the lights at Theodore while I was waiting to turn, and it only took me about 5 K's to catch up :)

The old diesel ute has been called many things (especially the time it broke down halfway up the Clyde), but stylish isn't one of them.....

Since I drive like a grandma to work, I thought you would have caught me a lot sooner than that! It's always an entertaining scenario in the morning when I have people go flying past me at warp 10 in their Kia's only to stop at the roundabout and then the lights where we turn off..

Haha, poor ute. C'mon, how is it not soooo much more stylish than a GTR, sheesh...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/577/#findComment-4787473
Share on other sites

I was stealth in the Audi. Had dropped my car off at Inline and in a daze my husband turned instead of going straight when we were leaving Qbn so slight detour lol.

Nice pile of tyres at Inline too Reece. Pity they're not the same size as mine I mighta slipped Chris a $50 to accidentally mix them up ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/577/#findComment-4791290
Share on other sites

Spotted Yellow 34 right out the front of erindale leisure centre as I drove past blinding them no doubt.

Also, some piece of shit (pardon the language) thinking he's f**king funny spitting on my car as he drives beside me in traffic coming down erindale drive - HAHA f**kWIT DIDN'T EXPECT ME TO SEE YOU DO IT HUH? BET YOU DIDN'T EXPECT ME TO GET YOUR PLATES AND MAKE/MODEL EITHER?

Good work to the above dipshit, you'll get your own.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/577/#findComment-4792380
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...