Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys and gals, having a discussion with the lads and we have varying ideas relating to anti-polution OBI 1 - 2 etc some think that a decat can net some huge gains of up to 25kw atw on a health RB26 - N1 spec turbos, 1 bar, others disagree, there really is nothing much on the net relating to a RB25 or 26 decat and with cat dyno results, only other makes and models of cars, experience here guys and gals, what were your results on the dyno? cheers

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

because its highly illegal on the street im not sure you'll get much of a response but guess it cant hurt to try.

Hi there, the question was purely to answer a debate with the mates and specifically tests on a dyno, no intentions of driving a decat on the streets, discussions also related to the Lean Burn on the old CL Chryslers and different cam combinations that Chrysler and Ford implimented in 1976, huge decreases in power but they had no catalytic convertors back then....................pretty sure no one here would be interested in discussing the old Chryslers and Fords any further, we all agreed how the polution gear robbed the power output as it is clearly written, nothing much on the effect of cats though which happened years later, cheers and thanks for coming back to me.

riteeeeeeee

Cheers mate, not sure what riteeeeee actually means, maybe us old guys that dabble in mopar muscle but have an appreciation for gtr's should chat elsewhere, dont seem to be going anywhere here, lol

because its highly illegal on the street

And you'll probably find 50% + of the users on here run a decat or a gutted cat or similar....

I cant say exactly what gains I made on my last car (ADM S15 with basic boltons, PFC, FMIC, Zorst, Disco Potato etc) but once I took the cat out and fitted my highly illegal decat pipe, the car made more boost (infact I had boost control issues) was noticably more responsive and revved easier. Seat of the pants dyno tells alot and I know it wasnt just a Placebo effect...

The 32 GTR I bought recently has some wanky $350 cat on it so im reluctant to pull that out but if it was a stock cat...gtfo of there!

you can try it on a dyno if you want to, the power difference between a decent highflow cat (fully functional) and some pipe where the cat would be is going to be very similar you will more than likely find a difference of less than 10kw.

sure there would be a much larger gain if you only had a stock/compliance cat with an engine/turbo setup for 300kw @ the wheels. but if you are going to spend money to get that far how is spending the small amount for a highflow cat that hard to justify?

And you'll probably find 50% + of the users on here run a decat or a gutted cat or similar....

I cant say exactly what gains I made on my last car (ADM S15 with basic boltons, PFC, FMIC, Zorst, Disco Potato etc) but once I took the cat out and fitted my highly illegal decat pipe, the car made more boost (infact I had boost control issues) was noticably more responsive and revved easier. Seat of the pants dyno tells alot and I know it wasnt just a Placebo effect...

The 32 GTR I bought recently has some wanky $350 cat on it so im reluctant to pull that out but if it was a stock cat...gtfo of there!

guess im in the 50% then :-P

either way i like flames :-D

i had a good book about doing everything to a mr2 from stock to v6 conversion . super charged , turbo charged , then twin charged to 22 psi (with all supporting mods ) at 540 whp putting the cat back in knocked it back to 500 whp

you guys running no cat on the street are mad, hectic flames or not. the epa fine is somewhere over $20k.

anyway, I have no cat and a big diameter exhaust (3.5"). Not making a lot of power (lets face it, 400 is the new 250) and I have never back to back tested a similar size exhaust with a high-flow cat. however....mine seems to make a couple of kw more than I have seen from other similar spec cars.

not at all scientific, and my guess is a good high flow cat (eg 4") would flow just as well as no cat

Ive had this debate with a lot of "good cat is a dead cat" people, My two cents...

Standard cat for an XR6t flows over 300kw and can be picked up cheap, not enough? Run two in parallel and you will have no restriction at all. Why damage the enviroment, get a huge potential fine and pretty yellow sticker for the sake of a couple of kw? Its the first thing a cop will check and some have infra-red thermometers. Leave the dead cats for race cars.

Much easier ways to gain more power like a simple water sprayer on your cooler, water/meth injection or 80mm suction pipes.

Ive had this debate with a lot of "good cat is a dead cat" people, My two cents...

Standard cat for an XR6t flows over 300kw and can be picked up cheap, not enough? Run two in parallel and you will have no restriction at all. Why damage the enviroment, get a huge potential fine and pretty yellow sticker for the sake of a couple of kw? Its the first thing a cop will check and some have infra-red thermometers. Leave the dead cats for race cars.

Much easier ways to gain more power like a simple water sprayer on your cooler, water/meth injection or 80mm suction pipes.

Such a good point - its the BF onwards triangular shaped cats that will flow 300rwkw the BA's are a bit crap. We have trouble getting 4" 200 cells to flow over 500rwhp the 100cell will go another 50-75 before running out - thats on the XR's anyways.

To answer your enquiry... I doubt you would see a 25rwkw gain by just removing a stock GTR cat on a simple set up. GTR cat's arn't that bad. There are gains to be had though, especially if it's the restriction in a higher flowing exhaust.

I'm planning on running 2 high performance cats for my new set up. Aiming for 500 rwkw.

PS I'm a (not so) younger fella who dabbles with GTR's and has a healthy appreciation for mopar muscle.... They're everywhere here in florida!!!

Just give you some idea of how much cat can affect performance. This was done back in Jan 2007. The cat used during the time was a magna flow 3inch high flowed cat. I don't think Honey corn cats were available back then.

CA18det using very old and retired version of TR43 with cat:

tr43cacat.JPG

CA18det using retired version of TR43 without cat:

tr432ndrunkw.JPG

Hey there, 208 to 230kw, as I thought and this was with a smaller engine but running considerable boost, thanks for the reply, is good that we got some communication going here, was starting to think that I am too much of an old fart, also "XRATED" really good to chat to someone from the states, nice to see that the GTR's are making a statement there too, ofcourse I still have the love for the Mopar Muscle and occasionally enjoy a cruise in my cousins 68 Dodge Charger, 400 stroked to 500 cubes, has a bit of curry :-) (visiting Plymouth Cuda Project here currently) and for those others out there who seem confused about this post, this post was not intented to suggest the removal of CATS on the road NOT even an option........it was clearly in reference to the results on a dyno in a controlled environment to satisfy a debate between mates, cheers

That's pretty crazy results... especially if they were using a "high flow" cat...

Hey Tony, I'm an Aussie working on a super yacht thats docked in Ft Lauderdale Florida... There is actually a mopar club event at Moroso motorsport park this weekend... A buddy of mine here with a big hp 33GTR is going. Show some of the old drag racers how versitile a GTR can be.

Cheers

Justin

Although I haven't tried this since well before my Power FC went in (so the typical exhaust, cooler and boost).

For laughs I swapped my 3" metal cat to a gutted factory cat. Couldn't feel any difference in the seat of the pants in terms of revvability or speed. Just a bit more crackle (No idea if it popped any flames or not as I was in the drivers seat) With a video camera from behind whilst the car was stationary revving it didn't do squat though.

Needless to say. The metal cat is in place full time. With plans for an unrestricted bolt on side pipe behind front wheel for track work to save weight and hopefully pop flames on the track.

Luke

I used to run de-cat pipe and there was a noticeable different in power for the vehicle, though I never got the difference dynoed. Along with the power increase came a raspy sound it would make in the high rpm range. But whenever I was near a cop car it scared the shit out of me the thought of getting hit with a couple of grand worth of fine. Ditched it for high flow cat when I got my exhaust system replaced and I'm much less paranoid driving around now. Really, if that extra 10-20kw means alot to you go for a bigger turbo / high flow. There are other ways to get it that don't cost you alot of money if you get caught using de-cat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
×
×
  • Create New...