Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'd smash the next queen to be though... Just sayin. She's got impeccable teeth for a pomme. Such a QILF.

:laugh:

Saw this equation on Facebook and half my friends got it wrong. Let's see if people here could pass year 7 maths...

6÷2(1+2) = ?

6 ÷ 2 = 3

Hence, 1 + 2 = 3

? = 3

You're only making yourselves sound like fags by using a cute name like that lol

P.s. Explain your answers boys. One of you is right but I'm sure the working out will be wrong.

Explaining answers bleh.

Numbers inside brackets get multiplied by 2...then summed together...then divided by 6?

I dunno, I didn't do maths past year 10 and I forget anything that happened before year 12. Then first day of uni = hello students you'll now be learning the ins and outs of linear relationships = FML

Explaining answers bleh.

Numbers inside brackets get multiplied by 2...then summed together...then divided by 6?

i had this argument with my missus who is a maths major at uni.......

answer is 9 because

after the brackets you need to work left to right, bodmas is correct but, its bodmas from left to right, ie the left most action takes precedence, because bodmas=bomdas

therefore its 9

Birds, you were correct with BODMAS, but got the order wrong.

Brackets

Division

Multiplication

Addition

Subtraction

6÷2(1+2)

Brackets first, making it 6÷2x3

Next is division, making it 3x3

3x3 = 9

Oh I see now. That makes sense. I always thought each item inside the brackets had to be multiplied by the outside number before summing them together, but that does go against BODMAS if you do it that way.

The creator could have picked a much better equation to demonstrate BODMAS though...you can unfortunately arrive at the same answer with many paths using those numbers.

EDIT: On second thoughts, maybe it's when there's a power outside the brackets that you multiply each number inside the brackets first.

I'm no math nut, but aren't Div and Multi ranked the same? They are however used from left to right?

indeed

hence

bodmas=bomdas

just like addition and subtraction are the same, its just the s sounds better at the end of the word :P

find me a time in any normal engineer's career that calls for laplace transform

only if your an electrical engineer i believe

just out of curiosity, who did you have for maths when you did laplace transforms (IIRC your at rmit yeah?)

only if your an electrical engineer i believe

just out of curiosity, who did you have for maths when you did laplace transforms (IIRC your at rmit yeah?)

Yan Ding.

I can't understand her accent.

Even electrical engineers dont use laplace.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...