Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Powertune S14 just made 370kW at the rears on 30psi with the 5557 journal bearing!!!

Nuts!!

NOW I'm exited.... What comp cover is it?

I don't think my stock rb25 is going to like 30psi/350+ rwkw...

I'd love to see the dyno sheet.

Cheers

Justin

Wow that's impressive, that would have to be the most power I've ever seen out of a 3037S period!

No dynajet mate, Dyno Dynamics, how much boost?

I've seen higher from 56Trims :D Nytsky on here did 363wkw on a Mainline dyno: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...e85&st=540# and obviously on Dynojets and Dynapacks people have made substantially higher again but its not apples and apples.

I know the billet Precision turbos do real good power, seen some amazing things from people running the 62mm and 67mm ones particularly. What I would like to see though is if they can do as good on pump fuel, EVERY impressive result I've heard of from them are on E85 etc.

I've seen higher from 56Trims :) Nytsky on here did 363wkw on a Mainline dyno: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Rb...e85&st=540# and obviously on Dynojets and Dynapacks people have made substantially higher again but its not apples and apples.

I know the billet Precision turbos do real good power, seen some amazing things from people running the 62mm and 67mm ones particularly. What I would like to see though is if they can do as good on pump fuel, EVERY impressive result I've heard of from them are on E85 etc.

I was going to mention Dave's nice effort (0.82), my HKS 3037S made 376kW on the same dyno on my SR, but it had a 1.12 a/r exhaust housing, so given what it is, the 5557 has shocked us. It's coming on way before my 3037S and making the power.

If you really want to make a more fair comparison to the 3076R/3037S we should be comparing the BB version on the 5557 where I'm sure it will ABSOLUTELY wipe the floor in every way. I've seen enough proof already :D:) :)

There is a safe limit to pump fuel tuning (I'd say not a huge amount past 300kW on an a 2L SR before you enter grenade land ) so if we wanted pump fuel results, we're best off comparing much smaller turbos that aren't capable of a lot more than that (for an SR20 anyway) might be a good comparo for an RB25 though

Will post up some results and a vid for you today guys

Edited by PJ.

Very cool, I had always had the impression the Precision turbos were a bit laggier than the Garrett equivalents but its starting to sound like thats not the case. Particularly forward to seeing results from the 5557 on the RB25! Shame we aren't seeing BB results but look forward to seeing your impending posts.

I am STILL on the edge of my seat waiting for a mates RB25 running a ball bearing PT6765 to be fired up and tuned, its all pretty near ready to go but he's lost momentum. That is a fairly serious build, everything should be there to make the most of the turbo so will be interesting to see when it is all go.

My car is nearing 200,000km on an unopened RB25 which has been making >270wkw for nearing 100,000 of those kms - I have to assume something is going to start complaining sooner or later so whether I like it or not I have to consider myself at a cross roads with my car's development. Seeing as I have to think about what next, the latest Precision, ForcedPerformance and Borg Warner (EFR) turbo results are all particularly interesting.

Wow thats some crazy results. I was waiting to see the results of the 5557 to see which one i have to buy. Was planning on buying the 5857 with a .82 rear for my RB25, now i'm not so sure what to get hmmmm.

What would you guys recommend? the 5857 with the .82 rear or .63 rear? or the 5557 with .82 or .63 rear for a RB25. My goal is 300kw maybe a bit more. Engine has CP pistons but stock rods, race bearings ect.

After seing this result, the answer would be def the 5557, 0.63 rear.

Got my 0.70 exhaust housing today, now we can have a much fairer matchup for the T04Z with the smaller 6265.

After looking at the graph this morning, Chea though there was a bit more in it :D

Starting to lift the head at that power so we're gonna have to leave it there for now. Have the Motive drag challenge next week, after that put a Tomei head gasket on and a 6262SP!!

I'll start making the vid

2m4ympj.jpg

9k2n49.jpg

2ccp8r8.jpg

5757SP, 6262SP, 76HP

Edited by PJ.
2m4ympj.jpg
That boost control is amazing. Can you get a ruler onto that graph just to make sure it's perfectly flat? lol

So the dyno is saying 31psi but the boost reading is clearly being held back by the map sensor... So how much boost is it actually running to make that power?!?

Plus, have you any graphs at a more reasonable boost setting? Say 22psi?

After looking at the graph this morning, Chea though there was a bit more in it :)

Starting to lift the head at that power so we're gonna have to leave it there for now. Have the Motive drag challenge next week, after that put a Tomei head gasket on and a 6262SP!!

I'll start making the vid

2m4ympj.jpg

9k2n49.jpg

2ccp8r8.jpg

5757SP, 6262SP, 76HP

PJ can you speculate what the intake temp of minus 77 might have on power? Where was the intake probe.......Antartica!! :D

Is it possible to post up a graph in rpm?

Cheers

PJ can you speculate what the intake temp of minus 77 might have on power? Where was the intake probe.......Antartica!! :D

Is it possible to post up a graph in rpm?

Cheers

LOL only just noticed the intake temp, went to post and you had already posted...

So dodgy temp correction and boost wound up so high the dyno can't even read, INTERESTING

Paul, Is it possible to get a 5557 or 5857 with a smallish Split Pulse T4 flange turbine housing?

Not at this stage, the smallest turbo we can offer in TS is a 6265

Simon, it was on 31psi in the end, on 20psi it made 297kW at the wheels

Not at this stage, the smallest turbo we can offer in TS is a 6265

Simon, it was on 31psi in the end, on 20psi it made 297kW at the wheels

Fair enough, just so you know it's MORE than 31psi... By the look of it maybe a fair bit more

Our sensor is broken so there is no correction at all.

We'll take it to the strip to prove the power for you. hopefully on Wednesday if it survies the flogging on Tuesday.

Car has gone 125mph with 290kW so far

Simon, the 31psi is real, trust me if it was more we wouldn't be afraid to tell you, we like boost here :D

Edited by PJ.
Not at this stage, the smallest turbo we can offer in TS is a 6265

Simon, it was on 31psi in the end, on 20psi it made 297kW at the wheels

Any idea on when they would be available? or alternativley If I were to by a Single entry T4 what sizes are available?

and would I be able to by a TS housing late ron?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...