Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A mate of mine has been building his RB25 for AGES, has a PT6765 CEA for it and was aiming for around 800hp @ hubs - the 66s seem like a decent improvement too. I've prefered the HTAs up till now, still quite interested to see more PTxx66 results and see if they have made up some of the difference. Another mate has a GT3586HTA on his RB30 running >700hp @ hubs on relatively mild boost levels and E30, was held back by fuel system - was still gaining power.

Thats cool but the supra is 3 litres and this ones taken out even more.... We need to see some RB26 results to be able to fully understand if this turbos gonna be a lag monster or not ??

Try it, let us know, kthanxbi

ITP Race cars tuned a Skyline with a stock RB25 running a PT6262 BB turbo and made >350kw @ wheels on 98 octane, looked really good but the impression I got from the dyno plot was that it was making full boost in the area of 5000-5500rpm.... fairly inline with the impression I've always had of the PT6262s, quite laggy but quite potent.

How does the gt35 hta compare to gtx35??

Never seen a comparison, but I'd suggest that the HTA GT3582R would spool better and be more responsive than the GTX3582R but that GTX3582R would be capable of more power.

ITP Race cars tuned a Skyline with a stock RB25 running a PT6262 BB turbo and made >350kw @ wheels on 98 octane, looked really good but the impression I got from the dyno plot was that it was making full boost in the area of 5000-5500rpm.... fairly inline with the impression I've always had of the PT6262s, quite laggy but quite potent.

Never seen a comparison, but I'd suggest that the HTA GT3582R would spool better and be more responsive than the GTX3582R but that GTX3582R would be capable of more power.

Would GT3586Hta make more than GTX3582?

The GT3586HTAs have definitely made some insane power, and are my preference... though the GTX3582Rs aren't exactly shrinking violets.

Garrett used slightly misleading naming on their Garrett GTX range, the GTX3582R for example has a 83mm exducer - or 85mm if you factor in the extended tips. The old GT3582R had a 61mm inducer, while the GTX3582R inducer is 62.5mm (bigger than PT6262) which is getting up there considering a GT4088R is 63.5mm! Its a substantial sized compressor they are using, it'd be really interesting to drive a GT3582R and GTX3582R car back to back to see the difference.

  • 2 weeks later...

OK guys im trying to achieve 400hp with stock internals. Anyone reckon i could do that for about 6 months before she blows. and im also having a big debate over the GT-RS and the Precision turbo PT5558. Which one would be more suitable for a street car which low to mid range boost but lso with some reasonable power.

The GT3586HTAs have definitely made some insane power, and are my preference... though the GTX3582Rs aren't exactly shrinking violets.

Garrett used slightly misleading naming on their Garrett GTX range, the GTX3582R for example has a 83mm exducer - or 85mm if you factor in the extended tips. The old GT3582R had a 61mm inducer, while the GTX3582R inducer is 62.5mm (bigger than PT6262) which is getting up there considering a GT4088R is 63.5mm! Its a substantial sized compressor they are using, it'd be really interesting to drive a GT3582R and GTX3582R car back to back to see the difference.

a guy on sau has done gt35 to gtx35 on his car, gained some top end power, but lost midrange and response.

OK guys im trying to achieve 400hp with stock internals. Anyone reckon i could do that for about 6 months before she blows. and im also having a big debate over the GT-RS and the Precision turbo PT5558. Which one would be more suitable for a street car which low to mid range boost but lso with some reasonable power.

anyway im after a precison billet turbo that would have a low to midrange power band. and also has the capability to produce 300kw, so im thinking along street/race turbo of some sort. any help

I will assume you have an RB powered car, in which case I will say both the GTRS and 5558 are poor options for 300kw.

Firstly the GTRS is not capable of getting you there, that is a 250kw job and thats it. The Precision is a high boost application and will need E85 to make it a comfortable result.

There are better/easier methods of hitting the 300 mark on an RB (assume RB25 from here), I would recommend you look at a GT30 based turbo or a hypergear G3 unit. The GT30 has great resale and is a well proven item, it will need a custom dump/lines/intake. The hypergear G3 will need the custom intake pipe but will work with most of the stock lines and will bolt up to the OEM dump. The G3 is probably a little more likely to hit 300kw on 98 but the GT30 will be a little more responsive (both run a .82 IW housing).

If you want to move to an externally gated option you can pick up one of the 'steampipe' manifolds for a good price and look at a kando T67 for you 300kw mark. That will be more likely to net 330kw, and the mentioned kit totals roughly the same as a hypergear and much less than the said GT30.

Now back to precision turbos.

  • 3 weeks later...

The new Precision PT6465CEA is now out and Sound Performance have tested it out against a PT6266 and PT6766 on a couple of different engines. First is a bog stock 2JZ running E85 on 36psi:

62vs64vs67_ReidsCar.jpg

Then just for prosperities sake they ran the same turbos to their limit on a fully built 3.4litre:

62vs64vs67.jpg

Interesting to note that the 64mm made more power everywhere on the stock motor running "less than maxed out", the 67mm only came into its own when everything was pushed to their limits - which really shouldn't be too surprising.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What does it look like with highway driving? And yes, I had a similar thought as Duncan. It looks quite similar in my Stagea and I have made myself accept it as normal. Might have to look into it some day  
    • While I was waiting for the new parts to come in for the charge pipe and radiator I decided to do some turbo modification. The drive pressure (exhaust backpressure) was a lot higher that I thought it should be. For 32lbs of boost drive was 55lbs. The turbine housing is a 1.10AR and my turbo builder has suggested to go to a 1.25AR. To test if a larger AR would do anything to reduce drive pressure AND not spend any money I decided to hog out the divider in my current housing. I removed it from the inlet and the whole way through the housing.  After reassembly and testing it doesn't look like this modification did anything for reducing drive pressure or requiring more fuel (making more power). Oh well, it was worth a shot. We'll get some data at the track if it makes it past the 60ft. I also machined a $7 shift knob off Amazon to fit my Stillway shifter since I didn't like the Stillway shift knob. Next on the list was the radiator replacement and fabrication of a new intercooler tube that had no silicon coupler. No pictures of this - I was short on time each night after work to get this done and didn't stop to take pictures.  Next was to get the clutch disks out and replaced. Previously when installing the dogbox I had ordered a set of the same sintered iron disks I had been running because I switched to the 26-spline input shaft. I thought it was odd that they didn't have any markings or brand name on them like all my old disks had but installed them anyway. At the track I could not get the clutch to lock up using my normal strategies. After two track nights I reached out to the clutch manufacturer and ask their thoughts. They said they had to switch the material out because they were having trouble getting the original material and that this new material would not take to being slipped very well.  So out with the first set of 26-spline disks and in with the correct material 26-spline disks. While I had the trans out I added an inspection/service hole. I've wanted one of these for a while. Now I can have a look at things and change the front cover shimming when needed (clutch wear). I hustled and got the clutch change done in a few hours on a Saturday. Hopped in the car and drove home. On the way home I did a 1-3 pull. When shifting from 2nd to 3rd the core plug in the back of the cylinder head popped out and dumped all the coolant. Thankfully I was only 30 seconds from home and coasted it there. Datalog showed nothing unusual and 2.5psi of coolant pressure. That plug has been in there since 1992 but I guess it worked its way out. Pulled the trans AGAIN and replaced the plug, JB welded it in, and made a brace. Also deleted the head drain I had added in during the bearing issue fiasco.  I am currently changing my boost control plumbing to make it cleaner. After that is done I'll make another attempt at getting past the 60.
    • Are you 100% sure this isn't tune related?
    • 140-150 across the board. At this point hoping the grounding harness fixes it. My grounds are all tied to the chassis and none to the battery. For SR and KA that’s never been a problem for me but had a few other guys here and Reddit who told me RB really like a very solid ground setup tied to the battery so going to try that next, I’m stumped if that doesn’t do it. Never had a car have spark and fuel and not fire off before. Only thing I can think is the spark is intermittent/weak because of grounds nothing else really makes sense at this point 
    • I am having close to the same issue. Can you help me with what wire you grounded to get your pump to trigger?
×
×
  • Create New...