Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was thinking about getting a Precision PT6262 for my RB26/30, have had a look on eBay $1137.28 delivered and Powertune Australia looks to have dropped their prices to$1150, only $13 difference so i ordered through Powertune Australia as they have warranty for the turbos as well as the support! I am excited and can't wait to test this baby out!! :)

sounds about right, powertune quoted me for 6266 jb $1080

  • 2 weeks later...

Finally got my 6466 .82 twin scroll running on a RB25/30 - beautiful response down low and its well on boost by 4000 rpm if not earlier,

Currently making 308rwkw at 13psi - low boost as the engine is still being run in.

That's good to hear! What's the maximum psi you plan on running on pump gas with that 6466?

Also, can you please do me a personal favor and measure the exterior diameter/width of your housings? I'm just worried I may not be able to fit it in my engine bay as my current setup is already a tight fit. Here's what my engine bay looks like:

20130318_133158_zps8104801e.jpg

wow 86 pages now? this thread is popular!.

got some results from my build for yaz.

431 hp atw @ 16psi on the little 6262 t4 t/s .84 on pump with plenty more left in it. will update the dyno charts section with my dyno sheet when I can be f*kt, or after I go back for the second tune.

Well, curiosity got the better of me after I encountered an issue with my 6466. I removed the unit, removed the drain and inlet oil restrict or and had a peek inside. Seems the entire rotating assembly is shifting forwards and backwards inside of the cartridge housing, almost as is there is a retaining clip missing. So on the blower I get, and it seems they don't really seem too keen on warranting it as I removed the restrictor. The fcuk? I wasn't born yesterday! I'll. upload a vid of it soon. I hope precision comes to the party on this one, same goes for PT.

I'm still debating whether to go with 6262, 6266 or 6466 as I'm planning to run this on 98 octane pump gas no more. I was told by a vendor the spool difference between a 6266 and a 6466 is almost negligible.

Yeah I can measure it up for you PM me to remind me if I forget!

I had the same dilemma I spoke to precision directly and workshops in the US that dealt with them and they all pretty much said about 300-500rpm difference in each so I bit the bullet and went the bigger as I knew id always be curious if I didnt. I haven't looked back put it that way, although I have it in twin scroll on a 6 boost manifold to help it all along and its on a 3L

Should be mid 20s on pump and 30+psi on E85 for the get farrked boost setting

  • Like 1

the 6466 is much bigger than a 3540 .7 front if that helps

That's good to hear! What's the maximum psi you plan on running on pump gas with that 6466?

Also, can you please do me a personal favor and measure the exterior diameter/width of your housings? I'm just worried I may not be able to fit it in my engine bay as my current setup is already a tight fit. Here's what my engine bay looks like:

20130318_133158_zps8104801e.jpg

Thanks for your feedback Donut_king! It looks like I'll be going with a 6266. The 6466 seems like it would require a lot of boost to come alive and that is no fun mated when it comes to pump gas.

Edited by G37Sam
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...