Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looking at a Precision turbo for my rb25det Neo.

From what I've gathered the 6266 0.84 should match nicely. Motor is internally stock but will be running E85.

I'm thinking about spending the extra cash on a twin scroll setup, going to be in a light S15 so I'd want power delivery as smooth as possible.

Any graphs or comments for a similar setup

Edited by n_D

Hey dave do you have any specs on whats done to the head? Im guessing its got some $$$'s spent on it? As good as the 6466 is dave I would still keep the good old HKS T51R. :) TILL THIS DAY, They still sound the best out of every turbo out there when spooling and cracking that big gate open. Not to mention how farking PORRRRN they look in a skyline engine bay. Haha. How much more do you reckon the t51r has left in it on your setup dave?

At this stage piggaz has talked me into going a pt6262 on my built rb25 with a r33 gtr 2.6ltr crank in it. After seeing all these 6466 30/25 or 30/26 setups making such grouse power makes me just want to build a 30 bottem end and go 6466.

:) :) :)

Josh

Hey dave do you have any specs on whats done to the head? Im guessing its got some $$$'s spent on it? As good as the 6466 is dave I would still keep the good old HKS T51R. :) TILL THIS DAY, They still sound the best out of every turbo out there when spooling and cracking that big gate open. Not to mention how farking PORRRRN they look in a skyline engine bay. Haha. How much more do you reckon the t51r has left in it on your setup dave?

At this stage piggaz has talked me into going a pt6262 on my built rb25 with a r33 gtr 2.6ltr crank in it. After seeing all these 6466 30/25 or 30/26 setups making such grouse power makes me just want to build a 30 bottem end and go 6466.

:) :) :)

Josh

Why would you wanna change it when it sounds like this :D

Took a snap of the graph from the 6466 on the RB26 that JEM tuned the other month.

Soooo much midrange for the power output.

attachicon.gif1380269364291.jpg

+1 on getting specs of this motor. 950 ftlbs and 30psi at 4700rpm from a 64mm turbo on 2.6L? how is that even possible?

I'm pretty sure it's just a basic build.

Forged pistons and rods, drop in cams etc.

TS 6466.

We went out on a cruise sat night with a few other big HP GTRs and this thing annihilated everything, every bit as responsive as the graph suggests.

I'm pretty sure it's just a basic build.

Forged pistons and rods, drop in cams etc.

TS 6466.

We went out on a cruise sat night with a few other big HP GTRs and this thing annihilated everything, every bit as responsive as the graph suggests.

Loving the sound of this

Richard had to drop the motor as it was sitting too high and the plazmaman was hitting the bonnet, I was there on Thursday dropping off some E85 and Richard said that it was due back from the exhuaust shop later that day then they had to drop the engine and finish off some of the connectors and a few hoses here and there and then it will be ready to start and hopfully tune. He said should be ready by mid this week

Richard had to drop the motor as it was sitting too high and the plazmaman was hitting the bonnet, I was there on Thursday dropping off some E85 and Richard said that it was due back from the exhuaust shop later that day then they had to drop the engine and finish off some of the connectors and a few hoses here and there and then it will be ready to start and hopfully tune. He said should be ready by mid this week

God. I can hear the money burning by the hour.

I hope it turns out well for you mate :thumbsup:

Not the same on the street?

How much more than the 6262?

With the hubber they are usually about 300-500rpm better on the street. With the roller it's usually closer but even if it was the same as the dyno it would still be awesome

I'm pretty sure it's just a basic build. Forged pistons and rods, drop in cams etc. TS 6466.We went out on a cruise sat night with a few other big HP GTRs and this thing annihilated everything, every bit as responsive as the graph suggests.

We'll, forgive me for being a sceptic, but I need to see a timeslip or data log to believe. This thing still makes 200 ftlbs more than I thought possible and spools earlier than a 35r. Crazy!

When I had a GT35R it was on song (26psi) by 4400rpm. This thing is laggier than that, id say T04Z territory.

These aren't a big turbo physically which is surprising to see what they produce. Looks like a GT35R from the front but the rear housing looks quite large.

The blade design on the turbine side is also something I haven't seen before, it is like the blades are convex. (if that makes sense)?

Just to add, I have seen 2x SR20VEs with these turbos making more power and on earlier than my T51R KAI RB30/25.

One ran 154mph and the other 148mph, both 5 speed H pattern cars.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...