Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I went from a garrett gt42r with a 1.01 rear to a 6466 with split pulse T4 1.00 rear thanks to PJ.

at 24-25psi i went from 426kws to 415kws but gained 100kw in the mid range. difference between the two is night and day.

this is on a supra 3L stock motor and pump fuel only.

it coota it ran 125mph on a runway surface with the 6466 and at wsid with the 42 the best i managed was 121mph

I just watched a Supra getting tuned, it easily maxed the 700kw dyno. lol. Seems the 6boost manifold overboost issues are still common across the range. :/

Precision turbo but I didn't find out what size. I only know it was massive and had a 5 inch inlet.

I also helped get the VL RB30 started, and got the 6766 spinning. Is it common to hear bearing noise with the ceramic bearing cartridges? There is oil supply but the bearings sound flat spotted. Perhaps they need to get hot before the clearances close up?

Scotty. Was the oil restrictor removed? If it was you have almost certainly put the restrictor back in the wrong recess of the chra. There are 4 recesses and only one lines up with the restrictor. If you have it in the wrong one it pushes the chra out of round and you get this bearing flat spot noise and noisy bearing.

I also helped get the VL RB30 started, and got the 6766 spinning. Is it common to hear bearing noise with the ceramic bearing cartridges? There is oil supply but the bearings sound flat spotted. Perhaps they need to get hot before the clearances close up?

My 6466 sounds like this. After 500km its free'd up slightly but you can hear the 'tink tink tink' noise as the turbo spins down just before it stops completely. Still boosts fine and is plenty responsive. Might email Precision.

A mate's 6262 is quite noisy also but I thought it was just the thing with roller bearing turbos. It was actually really hard to spin when it first went on the car but seems to have free'd up nicely now. My brother's GT30 is noisy as hell, even after it was reco'd

I've had a buggered precision 6262 roller apart before and it only had one hole in the centre cartridge for the oil restrictor to locate into, the drain hole on the opposite side was more than half the diameter. Wonder if there's a few different assemblies they use

Dave thats going to be one result ill be anticipating, 6262 TS on a Neo doesnt seem to be existant out there. Is its just the turbo and lines your changing

ditching the DE runners for DET, 4 inch dump and highmount 6 boost, new ECU and getting my VCT back

current setup is lowmount Hypergear with DE runners and faulty ground on VCT which will be fixed when it gets the ECU

ditching the DE runners for DET, 4 inch dump and highmount 6 boost, new ECU and getting my VCT back

6 Boost? I hope the wastegate exit off the manifold is welded on the correct angle, Kyle won't entertain the thought his manifolds are badly designed, so won't fix the simple design flaw. You should be right though, as the boost spiking is the tuner's fault apparently.

Nice, lucky i didnt buy the runner off you. I just have to get a highmount mani then chase for gold.

I have two of them so you can still have the spare if u want it!

6 Boost? I hope the wastegate exit off the manifold is welded on the correct angle, Kyle won't entertain the thought his manifolds are badly designed, so won't fix the simple design flaw. You should be right though, as the boost spiking is the tuner's fault apparently.

you just had to make me go dig it out of its box and unwrap it just to check didnt you!

would of preferred a more even flow but a 90degree shouldnt be so bad.. if it spikes ill just run what it puts out! 35psi for all!

NDq8uYV.jpg

Got the car tuned the other day at Unigroup and the Precision 6766 is a weapon of a turbo. We opted for the 1.0 T4 split pulse rear end. We used to have a good old T78 on the engine, its an RB26, and at the same boost the 6766 is about 55rwkw up. All we changed was the turbo and dump pipe

We ended up with a consistant 485rwkw at 25psi on E-Flex which is currently showing around E60. Going to get some United E85 and see if we can crack 500rwkw with a bit more timing. I dont want to run any more boost so what it makes at 25psi is what its going to make ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welp, good to know. Will have to wait awhile until steady hands with drills and taps are available. In other news, these just arrived! I will weigh them for posterity.
    • 100% the factory sender is tapered, that is how it seals (well, that and teflon paste or tape)
    • Thanks folks - I've saved a few links and I'll have to think of potential cable/adapters/buying fittings. First step will be seeing if I can turn the curren abortion of a port into something usable, then get all BSPT'y on it. I did attempt to look at the OEM sender male end to see if it IS tapered because as mentioned you should be able to tell by looking at it... well, I don't know if I can. If I had to guess it looks like *maybe* 0.25 of a mm skinnier at the bottom of the thread compared to where the thread starts. So if it is tapered it's pretty slight - Or all the examples of BSPT vs BSPP are exaggerated for effect in their taper size.
    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
×
×
  • Create New...