Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 5 weeks later...

Ok guys

I have a 3L nitto bottom end

26 head with 1mm oversized valves, jun cams, ported

Single fogger nos kit

Greddy plenum

Trust 100mm drag cooler

Going 6870

Should I get the .84 or 1.0 twin scroll rear

Chasing max power but more interested in how laggy the bigger rear housing is

Any advice would be much appreciated

Pt make the numbers, but they seem to be pretty fussy with oil contamination or old motors compared to Garrett stuff . My mates 6466 leaks oil out the core..after 50km..he didnt fit a filter..as he doesnt ever listen..

Another guy i know went through 2 BB 6766's in quick succession, then fitted a filter and had no problem. Wasnt a old motor.either.

Both rb30s. Bad luck..dont know..

Would i buy a pt ..yeh (and have done and will again when 6870 t3 comes out) , would I ever fit one without a filter, nope , thats for sure.

cheers

darren

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

94 R32 GTR

Precision 6766 BB .82 T3
Tomei poncams type b
RB26

Standard bottom end
100mm intercooler

http://imgur.com/a0DW4gH

made 501 @ 20 psi on 98 full boost around 5k.
still gotta do my e85 tune.

Im looking at going to something smaller but wouldnt mind getting some ideas off you's guys. i have looked at going to the smaller rear housing .62 i know ill loose top end but yeah just trying to find something more responsive. Don't get me wrong shes fun to drive on the freeway and rolling starts. I got the whole kit off a friend for cheap and he made 620 @ 25 psi on e85 on a stock 26 but he was getting boost around the 5500 mark. have got this turbo up for sale as im gonna be looking at a 6262 or 6062.

Don't choke such a large turbo up with a peanut sized rear. Want more low end? Go to a smaller turbo and have a decent rear end. Not a compressor that wants to flow a million HP but a rear that wants to flow 500. Compressor limited not turbine limited. It's a much healthier way of doing it.

  • Like 1

Don't choke such a large turbo up with a peanut sized rear. Want more low end? Go to a smaller turbo and have a decent rear end. Not a compressor that wants to flow a million HP but a rear that wants to flow 500. Compressor limited not turbine limited. It's a much healthier way of doing it.

sweet cheers for that bro.

^^^What he said! You will turn it into a turd mate. Whats your power goal? Pick the right size turbo for your application. If you are going E85 go a size smaller even for killer response!

Like i said i got a good deal on it at the time i was about to rebuild my twins and had everything out of the bay. im looking around the 600-700 mark. if my bottom end goes ill rebuild. next size down is a 6466 or even 6266

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...