Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Buraz said:

What's everyone's results with 6262 precision??

My is out of puff at just under 440kw and 26 psi on a 2.8l stroker

Mine has gone 560kw at the hubs. 440kw sounds significantly lower regardless of the dyno. Got a graph? Any restrictions?

Ahhh okay!! That's a big difference for sure. No restrictions whatsoever, it's a split pulse 6 boost and twin gates too. 17.5psi springs!!

 

Car hammers no doubt about it and I'm more than happy. Just thought I'd share my results with you guys and see other results

Oh wow that's a massive difference!! Is it same rear housing as mine?? After talking to a few people now, this thing is only a tiny turbo and tell me it's about right.
But yours is an unbelievable result. Still a 2.6?

  • 5 weeks later...

Mine should be hitting the dyno next week hopefully 

previous tune was 645kw at 34psi with a 7175 gt42 on a hks 2.8

few changes since last tune such as 100mm plazmaman cooler and turbo1 custom twin scroll manifold with twin 38mm tial gates,

should come on nicer now then it did with the old greddy stainless manifold

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
On ‎25‎/‎05‎/‎2017 at 10:04 PM, SiR_RB said:

Mine should be hitting the dyno next week hopefully 

previous tune was 645kw at 34psi with a 7175 gt42 on a hks 2.8

few changes since last tune such as 100mm plazmaman cooler and turbo1 custom twin scroll manifold with twin 38mm tial gates,

should come on nicer now then it did with the old greddy stainless manifold

How did it go?

I am quite interested to see how much difference a manifold makes.

I have a 6766 on a T88 Greddy manifold and have access to a 6 boost if the need arises. The car makes 460 odd rwkw @30psi on Unigroups dyno and traps 138mph but I still want more.

Have been told I should have gone the 6466 as its better suited to an RB26

Edited by ido09s
On 26/06/2017 at 11:22 PM, SimonR32 said:

The 6262 sillyness is never ending... New cams just got the most power and torque it's ever made

20170626_145138_zpswxu7yhfh.jpg

Lol what..

760 awhp on a turbo rated to 705hp.. not questioning your results but that is going to be overspeeding by like 30%

 

Very impressive that it's still happy pushed that hard. I'm interested in your exhaust back pressure and compressor outlet temp numbers.

Dynapack hubber gives a possible 5-10% inflated reading.. However simons back to back results with his setup and different cam combos are awesome and the car speaks for itself performance wise.. 

Its unfortunate that the next time its dynoed it wont be a true back to back unless you can sweet talk sean and he has access to the dyno still

 

Edited by azzada1
6 hours ago, burn4005 said:

Lol what..

760 awhp on a turbo rated to 705hp.. not questioning your results but that is going to be overspeeding by like 30%

 

Very impressive that it's still happy pushed that hard. I'm interested in your exhaust back pressure and compressor outlet temp numbers.

Technically it's rear hub hp, not awhp. I don't think they have an overspeed (it's not an EFR after all)

Turning the dyno on SAE correction it shows up 797hp so god knows how much it's making at the flywheel but definitely more than the turbo is rated at. Never measured backpressure in exhaust but air temps after the intercooler are more than reasonable

30 minutes ago, SimonR32 said:

Technically it's rear hub hp, not awhp. I don't think they have an overspeed (it's not an EFR after all)

Turning the dyno on SAE correction it shows up 797hp so god knows how much it's making at the flywheel but definitely more than the turbo is rated at. Never measured backpressure in exhaust but air temps after the intercooler are more than reasonable

its frustrating that no compressor maps are available for precisions because a turbo compressor power rating is usually based on an efficiency below 58% or even the stonewall flow (flow choke) of the compressor. this is the speed that part of the assembly reaches sonic speed and flow basically cannot be increased any further by spinning it faster or altering the downstream pressure. thats why the choke line is vertical in a compressor map. (although note that maps from garret state efficiency below 58% is the end of their displayed map, and they consider that point "overspeeding") It's not necessarily when it wants to fall apart, but the efficiency falls over and then finally the compressor won't flow any more due to sonic shock waves inside the compressor inlet or volute causing a choked flow condition.

its interesting that the Precisions seem to be happy well past the flow the manufacturer rates the compressor for. whereas Borg Warner made their turbines strong enough to cope with the choke speed of the compressor they paired it with and not much more as its outside the design parameters.

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...