Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, ido09s said:

How much power does the car make now?

have you raced it yet and what mph did it run?

I was working from his sig: (I'm used to Dynapacks and the mph vs power figure don't add up so there may be more to the story)

Was 10.61 @ 127.9 mph in 2011 (old tune on 523kw forged 2.6). 2018 power with 2.8 coming soon

 

I don't see the 6466 getting even close to 500kw on 98 octane.  My 8.9:1 cr RB34 with the 6466 managed 385 kw on 98 octane at gate pressure of 12lb. Tuned on a 30+ degree high humidity day.  Alice springs has much drier air.

Turned up to 18 it was able to make more low and mid range but was knock limited at around 400 ish kw.  E85 solved that but the turbo still runs out of puff and maxed at 525kw.

I don't have any real drag times that count as I've only had one clean pass on low boost, that was also a soft start.  11.6 @ 125mph.  

The options are either to have a race fuel tune, low compression/high boost or add a WMI kit.  You have to keep that knock under control, and the only way you'll get past 500kw is to get that cylinder pressure up.

15 minutes ago, Lithium said:

I was working from his sig: (I'm used to Dynapacks and the mph vs power figure don't add up so there may be more to the story)

Was 10.61 @ 127.9 mph in 2011 (old tune on 523kw forged 2.6). 2018 power with 2.8 coming soon

 

they certainly don't.

Actually the R33 does. A car I built went 330rwkw on Unigroups dyno and ran 11.3@125.

That 10.6 he said it ran @127 must have been a reasonable back off and in that case his current setup probably should run into the 9's anyway so doesn't really need changing. Probably just needs a decent tune and a nice ECU controlled boost controller

 

12 minutes ago, GTRNUR said:

I don't see the 6466 getting even close to 500kw on 98 octane.  My 8.9:1 cr RB34 with the 6466 managed 385 kw on 98 octane at gate pressure of 12lb. Tuned on a 30+ degree high humidity day.  Alice springs has much drier air.

Turned up to 18 it was able to make more low and mid range but was knock limited at around 400 ish kw.  E85 solved that but the turbo still runs out of puff and maxed at 525kw.

I don't have any real drag times that count as I've only had one clean pass on low boost, that was also a soft start.  11.6 @ 125mph.  

The options are either to have a race fuel tune, low compression/high boost or add a WMI kit.  You have to keep that knock under control, and the only way you'll get past 500kw is to get that cylinder pressure up.

so are you saying your car made 525rwkw but only ran 125mph?

 

3 minutes ago, fatz said:

500kw is more like 145mph? 

should be about that yeah. My S14 makes 500rwkw on Unigroups dyno and runs 138mph all day every day.

55 minutes ago, ido09s said:

so are you saying your car made 525rwkw but only ran 125mph? 

 

Low boost, 18lb so I guess around 400kw.  Not the 30lb 500+kw tune. 

I only mentioned it in case that was going to be someone's next question.  I suspect with my crappy driving and new tyres I could probably do a low 10.  Also I have a 3 hr return drive to the nearest track, and it wasn't trailered.  I didn't want to risk breaking a diff or something.

The point I was trying to get across is that 98 octane will knock limit you to around 400kw even on a very stout engine build.

Edited by GTRNUR
7 hours ago, ido09s said:

they certainly don't.

Actually the R33 does. A car I built went 330rwkw on Unigroups dyno and ran 11.3@125.

That 10.6 he said it ran @127 must have been a reasonable back off and in that case his current setup probably should run into the 9's anyway so doesn't really need changing. Probably just needs a decent tune and a nice ECU controlled boost controller

 

so are you saying your car made 525rwkw but only ran 125mph?

 

should be about that yeah. My S14 makes 500rwkw on Unigroups dyno and runs 138mph all day every day.

Yes my 33 GTR is dynoing 310-330kw and good for mid 11s at around 118-120mph, with HKS gt-ss turbos at 22psi and 3rd in the OS Giken box. Maybe if I could snatch 4th I'd get a tad more mph. The 32 well.....

I run the 10 on the original setup by Jakes performance tuned by Tilbrook auto with 125 - 130mph. The dyno I was supplied with on car purchase in 2008 was 500+kw on the Tilbrook dyno dynamics. I agree no way it could have been, hence I started a thread back then in 2009 which I have just revived to continue the cars development.

My 32 power at the real confirmed 500kw + level by Willall racing was never run back at the drags to see the real potential of car as I've had multiple failures since then.

For more info on car thread is in the drift and drag section.

I would love to continue the advice and feedback regarding this, but would probably rather do it in that thread as this is the Precision turbo thread and don't want to have my cars specifics filling up a specialised thread on these turbos.

Go have a read at my hell that has been my R32 GTR.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all, 

Back again and had the car on the dyno on Monday with the only change being the 600x300x100 cooling pro intercooler. 

Compressor seemed to run out of puff at 26psi and tapered off to 25psi by the end of the run which was a bit disappointing. Saw a bit of wheel spin on this run as you can see at the top. 

For a $260 intercooler it made a pretty good difference.  

Car is pretty incredible to drive, it has awesome low end torque and it quite responsive. Keen to test it out at roll racing in a couple of weeks. 

 

-Ryan

received_291482618159487.jpeg

56 minutes ago, r33ryan said:

Hi all, 

Back again and had the car on the dyno on Monday with the only change being the 600x300x100 cooling pro intercooler. 

Compressor seemed to run out of puff at 26psi and tapered off to 25psi by the end of the run which was a bit disappointing. Saw a bit of wheel spin on this run as you can see at the top. 

For a $260 intercooler it made a pretty good difference.  

Car is pretty incredible to drive, it has awesome low end torque and it quite responsive. Keen to test it out at roll racing in a couple of weeks. 

 

-Ryan

received_291482618159487.jpeg

I'd doubt the compressor is anywhere close to being out, mine is rated at less and puts out 200hp more. Just up the duty cycle top end.

I'd also comment that the graph looks extremely lazy. 85kw at 4000rpm is horrible. There is something not right there, does it still retain VCT?

Edited by SimonR32

As Simon said, something doesn't look, nor sound, right. Though I have never used a turbo the size of yours, most PT's love it at the high side of 25psi and just keep making boost. I am at 32psi and no sign of the 6766 stopping yet

As an example, my 6766 with a 1.0 rear end at 4500 is making an easy 19psi and 420rwkw. I dare say yours should be making more than 11psi and 110rwkwk

2 hours ago, r33ryan said:

Compressor seemed to run out of puff at 26psi and tapered off to 25psi by the end of the run which was a bit disappointing. Saw a bit of wheel spin on this run as you can see at the top. 

 

What was the pre-intercooler intake temps?  Presumably that was taken if "compressor seemed to run out of puff" was the official diagnosis.

Do you know what boost control solenoid duty cycle is?  This looks almost like what I'd expect if the boost control setup was nearing the end of it's ability, like if you were running too soft a spring for the setup - not that the turbo is maxed out.  That wavey power/boost curve situation is much more of a "boost control issue" than a "maxed out compressor" type behaviour.

Edited by Lithium
3 hours ago, SimonR32 said:

There is something not right there, does it still retain VCT?

Still retains vct yes. 

I'm just going off what I was told, I'm not a mechanic and only have a pretty basic knowledge. I'm interested to hear what you all have to say and if there are a few things I can check. 

I've seen your build Simon so I did find it weird for the compressor to have run out. Obviously different builds here but still for it to be that different. I was hoping to screw a bit more into it. 

 

2 hours ago, Lithium said:

What was the pre-intercooler intake temps?  Presumably that was taken if "compressor seemed to run out of puff" was the official diagnosis.

Do you know what boost control solenoid duty cycle is?  This looks almost like what I'd expect if the boost control setup was nearing the end of it's ability, like if you were running too soft a spring for the setup - not that the turbo is maxed out.  That wavey power/boost curve situation is much more of a "boost control issue" than a "maxed out compressor" type behaviour.

I'm not entirely sure on the pre-intercooler temps sorry, just what I was told. 

I didn't before you mentioned it, just had a look. Unsure how mine is set. Twin 45mm hypergates with 14psi springs. Pretty sure they are 7psi inner and 7psi outter? 

 

I almost asked if you are running a 1bar spring. In terms of cost versus reward that would be the first area I would be looking at - especially easy to confirm by checking wastegate duty cycle

  • 3 weeks later...
On 5/16/2018 at 8:02 PM, Lithium said:

Nice - any more specifics?  Been quite curious about the SX-E turbos and a few RBs seem to have them but no dyno sheets or hardly even any numbers, yours included now haha

Here is a pic of my dyno sheet ( Borg warner S366 T4 .88 AR) . S1 RB25, Kelford 270 cams, supertech valve train (stock sized), CP pistons (stock bore and compression), Manley rods, balanced crank/ block. Otaku manifold, ID2000s . Revs to 8K on E85 @30 lbs. 

As you can see the turbo is pretty laggy to come on. I'm actually in the market for a PT 6466 or 6870. I'm torn between the 2. looking for some advice. The goal is to move the power band to 4000-4500 while still maintaining the current power.

Loca Dyno - 680.jpg

Edited by feedmyfast
added more specifics

Wow that's laggy all right. OK on the track with a close ratio gearbox but pretty useless otherwise. I would like some power from 3000 on...peaking at 4 - 5000 would be fine.

What kind of ecu do you have and does it control boost as well?

1 hour ago, feedmyfast said:

Here is a pic of my dyno sheet ( Borg warner S366 T4 .88 AR) . S1 RB25, Kelford 270 cams, supertech valve train (stock sized), CP pistons (stock bore and compression), Manley rods, balanced crank/ block. Otaku manifold, ID2000s . Revs to 8K on E85 @30 lbs. 

As you can see the turbo is pretty laggy to come on. I'm actually in the market for a PT 6466 or 6870. I'm torn between the 2. ooking for some advice. The goal is to move the power band to 4000-4500 while still maintaining the current power.

 

Ouch, that's nasty - not overly surprised though, the Airwerks S366s are pretty lazy for their flow at the best of times - I've never understood why they have been so popular when a lot of people using them actually could do fine with the 60 or 62mm options.  Going with the open T4 .88a/r housing and putting it on an RB25 is definitely not setting up a recipe for response.  

Will you be staying with the T4 open housing?  I'm assuming that's why you are looking at Precision... if so, I'd look at the Gen2 PT5862 or at the absolute max a PT6062.  I'm not sure why you'd go for a 6466 or a 6870 when you are "only" looking at <700whp Dynojet.... unless you are looking for headroom to make >800whp (6466) or >900whp (6870)?   

A Gen2 5862 will make well into the 600whp range and be a different car to drive.  If you would consider changing your exhaust setup to T4 Divided then your options for good power and response get substantially better, too.

  • Like 1
57 minutes ago, KiwiRS4T said:

Wow that's laggy all right. OK on the track with a close ratio gearbox but pretty useless otherwise. I would like some power from 3000 on...peaking at 4 - 5000 would be fine.

What kind of ecu do you have and does it control boost as well?

I'm running a AEM V2 ECU and it controls the boost 

10 minutes ago, Lithium said:

Ouch, that's nasty - not overly surprised though, the Airwerks S366s are pretty lazy for their flow at the best of times - I've never understood why they have been so popular when a lot of people using them actually could do fine with the 60 or 62mm options.  Going with the open T4 .88a/r housing and putting it on an RB25 is definitely not setting up a recipe for response.  

Will you be staying with the T4 open housing?  I'm assuming that's why you are looking at Precision... if so, I'd look at the Gen2 PT5862 or at the absolute max a PT6062.  I'm not sure why you'd go for a 6466 or a 6870 when you are "only" looking at <700whp Dynojet.... unless you are looking for headroom to make >800whp (6466) or >900whp (6870)?   

A Gen2 5862 will make well into the 600whp range and be a different car to drive.  If you would consider changing your exhaust setup to T4 Divided then your options for good power and response get substantially better, too.

I went with this turbo at first because it is reliable and cheap for the power i wanted. The car was originally a weekend street car and didnt mind the laggy and very lazy turbo. Recently i have been doing more drag / roll racing events so that very late power band isnt working for me anymore. i literally have to chase every race, its a great top end car but down low i might as well be N/A.

Yes, intend on staying with the T4 open housing so I won't have to spend too much money for an already expensive upgrade. I am definitely looking for some headroom for other mods (stroker / RB30) in the future. Looking for a turbo i can run now and not have to toss aside when i do the next setup. 

On ‎11‎/‎28‎/‎2018 at 3:42 PM, r33ryan said:

Pulled the duty cycle up today. What do you guys reckon? 

received_363659700874815.jpeg

Time for a larger spring for the gate OR run a 4 port solenoid (may have missed it, but I'm assuming you're running a 3 port)

32 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Time for a larger spring for the gate OR run a 4 port solenoid (may have missed it, but I'm assuming you're running a 3 port)

Yeah going to upgrade to 21psi springs in twin 45s. 

Ill also change the gate pressure source from the turbo to the intake manifold before I put it back on the dyno.  

Found the pipe in the white circle that comes off the idle control block that wasnt blocked off either. Blocking pipe must have blown off so it would be leaking boost out of it. 

 

Fixed it up now so  once ive put the springs in and finalized a few other bits and pieces I'll gey it back on the dyno. 

received_2264486480273581.jpeg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...