Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A mate of mine has been building his RB25 for AGES, has a PT6765 CEA for it and was aiming for around 800hp @ hubs - the 66s seem like a decent improvement too. I've prefered the HTAs up till now, still quite interested to see more PTxx66 results and see if they have made up some of the difference. Another mate has a GT3586HTA on his RB30 running >700hp @ hubs on relatively mild boost levels and E30, was held back by fuel system - was still gaining power.

Thats cool but the supra is 3 litres and this ones taken out even more.... We need to see some RB26 results to be able to fully understand if this turbos gonna be a lag monster or not ??

Try it, let us know, kthanxbi

ITP Race cars tuned a Skyline with a stock RB25 running a PT6262 BB turbo and made >350kw @ wheels on 98 octane, looked really good but the impression I got from the dyno plot was that it was making full boost in the area of 5000-5500rpm.... fairly inline with the impression I've always had of the PT6262s, quite laggy but quite potent.

How does the gt35 hta compare to gtx35??

Never seen a comparison, but I'd suggest that the HTA GT3582R would spool better and be more responsive than the GTX3582R but that GTX3582R would be capable of more power.

ITP Race cars tuned a Skyline with a stock RB25 running a PT6262 BB turbo and made >350kw @ wheels on 98 octane, looked really good but the impression I got from the dyno plot was that it was making full boost in the area of 5000-5500rpm.... fairly inline with the impression I've always had of the PT6262s, quite laggy but quite potent.

Never seen a comparison, but I'd suggest that the HTA GT3582R would spool better and be more responsive than the GTX3582R but that GTX3582R would be capable of more power.

Would GT3586Hta make more than GTX3582?

The GT3586HTAs have definitely made some insane power, and are my preference... though the GTX3582Rs aren't exactly shrinking violets.

Garrett used slightly misleading naming on their Garrett GTX range, the GTX3582R for example has a 83mm exducer - or 85mm if you factor in the extended tips. The old GT3582R had a 61mm inducer, while the GTX3582R inducer is 62.5mm (bigger than PT6262) which is getting up there considering a GT4088R is 63.5mm! Its a substantial sized compressor they are using, it'd be really interesting to drive a GT3582R and GTX3582R car back to back to see the difference.

  • 2 weeks later...

OK guys im trying to achieve 400hp with stock internals. Anyone reckon i could do that for about 6 months before she blows. and im also having a big debate over the GT-RS and the Precision turbo PT5558. Which one would be more suitable for a street car which low to mid range boost but lso with some reasonable power.

The GT3586HTAs have definitely made some insane power, and are my preference... though the GTX3582Rs aren't exactly shrinking violets.

Garrett used slightly misleading naming on their Garrett GTX range, the GTX3582R for example has a 83mm exducer - or 85mm if you factor in the extended tips. The old GT3582R had a 61mm inducer, while the GTX3582R inducer is 62.5mm (bigger than PT6262) which is getting up there considering a GT4088R is 63.5mm! Its a substantial sized compressor they are using, it'd be really interesting to drive a GT3582R and GTX3582R car back to back to see the difference.

a guy on sau has done gt35 to gtx35 on his car, gained some top end power, but lost midrange and response.

OK guys im trying to achieve 400hp with stock internals. Anyone reckon i could do that for about 6 months before she blows. and im also having a big debate over the GT-RS and the Precision turbo PT5558. Which one would be more suitable for a street car which low to mid range boost but lso with some reasonable power.

anyway im after a precison billet turbo that would have a low to midrange power band. and also has the capability to produce 300kw, so im thinking along street/race turbo of some sort. any help

I will assume you have an RB powered car, in which case I will say both the GTRS and 5558 are poor options for 300kw.

Firstly the GTRS is not capable of getting you there, that is a 250kw job and thats it. The Precision is a high boost application and will need E85 to make it a comfortable result.

There are better/easier methods of hitting the 300 mark on an RB (assume RB25 from here), I would recommend you look at a GT30 based turbo or a hypergear G3 unit. The GT30 has great resale and is a well proven item, it will need a custom dump/lines/intake. The hypergear G3 will need the custom intake pipe but will work with most of the stock lines and will bolt up to the OEM dump. The G3 is probably a little more likely to hit 300kw on 98 but the GT30 will be a little more responsive (both run a .82 IW housing).

If you want to move to an externally gated option you can pick up one of the 'steampipe' manifolds for a good price and look at a kando T67 for you 300kw mark. That will be more likely to net 330kw, and the mentioned kit totals roughly the same as a hypergear and much less than the said GT30.

Now back to precision turbos.

  • 3 weeks later...

The new Precision PT6465CEA is now out and Sound Performance have tested it out against a PT6266 and PT6766 on a couple of different engines. First is a bog stock 2JZ running E85 on 36psi:

62vs64vs67_ReidsCar.jpg

Then just for prosperities sake they ran the same turbos to their limit on a fully built 3.4litre:

62vs64vs67.jpg

Interesting to note that the 64mm made more power everywhere on the stock motor running "less than maxed out", the 67mm only came into its own when everything was pushed to their limits - which really shouldn't be too surprising.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...