Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If imported cars were not clearly targeted for noise and epa tests this exercise would almost be pointless.There is more unsafe cars on the road than what most of us people on here drive.If we have a problem with our cars that we think is unsafe or needs fixing at least we try to have it fixed.Most of our cars have been tuned to have better fuel consumption using higher grades of petrol.

i would hate to see what a 1974 holden with lead replacement fuel uses

and the overall pollution it puts out with no cat and bad shockers drum breaks and every thing worn out not including the extra oil it burns or the old dodge truck that jack uses to take his sheep to the farm.leaving black smoke behind him for the last (MILE) Yes mile not kilometers

sooner or later our cars will not be a revenue raiser for the government and will be classed as a form of transport just like JACKS TRUCK ...

"While it did not offer specific numbers, Victoria Police noted the Nissan Skyline range as the vehicle of choice for the majority of offenders."

In order to be an offender, you must be proven guilty. Unless the db get physically measured, this statement is incorrect.

It should read "Victoria Police is now targetting the Nissan Skyline range" :)

"While it did not offer specific numbers, Victoria Police noted the Nissan Skyline range as the vehicle of choice for the majority of offenders."

In order to be an offender, you must be proven guilty. Unless the db get physically measured, this statement is incorrect.

It should read "Victoria Police is now targetting the Nissan Skyline range" :/

Maybe at the end of the day, even though they handed out loads of EPA's, maybe only 1/3 of the cars are actually over the limit lol, so that's why they don't want to state it, so it still looks successful lol

that's all it EVER was....

as i said before... if noise form cars was a real concern to the govt then we wouldn't have the grand prix.

end of f**king story

If imported cars were not clearly targeted for noise and epa tests this exercise would almost be pointless.There is more unsafe cars on the road than what most of us people on here drive.If we have a problem with our cars that we think is unsafe or needs fixing at least we try to have it fixed.Most of our cars have been tuned to have better fuel consumption using higher grades of petrol.

i would hate to see what a 1974 holden with lead replacement fuel uses

and the overall pollution it puts out with no cat and bad shockers drum breaks and every thing worn out not including the extra oil it burns or the old dodge truck that jack uses to take his sheep to the farm.leaving black smoke behind him for the last (MILE) Yes mile not kilometers

sooner or later our cars will not be a revenue raiser for the government and will be classed as a form of transport just like JACKS TRUCK ...

Don't be silly, why would they target an innocent civilian like that? They want to chase down the real criminals, Skylines with sports exhausts who by association and stereotyping break road rules all the time. All of us desperate criminals interfering with the lives of other people. Spending our money on maintaining our cars instead of drugs. We really should form something of a vocal minority club based around this kind of shit - whichever government offers to give up the bullshit revenue raising tactics gets our vote. Because there are ALOT of car enthusiasts in Victoria. It would take alot of pride swallowing for some one eyed voters to be prepared for a swing vote though. Cause right now both major state government parties just seem to be trying to out do each other rather than differ on issues. Instead of "I won't do this" it's a case of "I'll do it twice as much as you can".

Noise pollution is the biggest crock of shit excuse. Fair enough a party next door with loud music going on for hours into the night, you can't escape that. But how long does it take for a car to drive by a house, 3 seconds at 50km/h? Can you even hear the exhaust from inside other cars when driving on the road? I imagine the people who have it worst are those who sit at a bus stop and have to listen to cars idle when traffic comes to a stop, for about a minute. And we all know how deafening an engine idle can be.

harley's do get pinned.... i was speaking to a noise tester the other day and he was saying that he used to get heaps of them in...

i'm all for bird's idea actually... if we organised to vote in a particular direction, 100,000 odd votes could actually get the government thinking

you'ze guys are soft if u go by with ya big cannon blasting people are gonna think the same of you today as they did 3 weeks ago really article doesnt change much.. not to mention how many people read that?

But the lawmakers are slaves to the media Alex...

That's why Skylines were/are targeted in the first place, because of every article that ever mentioned Skylines since the beginning of time. It's not a word of mouth thing, it's media.

they havent been targetted since day dot.

like saying vn commo's were always bogan spec single spinner brakie machines.

its the sheer number of skylines on the roads that has caused this problem not the media. particularly 33's when you say skyline 90% of ppl would think 33 over a 32 or 34 as their are lower volume of them getting around

it amazes me how many skylines i see around every single day.

I'm quite sure that this would attract an EPA...

:P

Anyway, I haven't been done (as far as I know), but I have seen a couple cars get pulled over - one was a WRX and another was a CRX with 20" exhaust :D If they are going after noisy shitboxes, that's great :)

I'm quite sure that this would attract an EPA...
:P

Anyway, I haven't been done (as far as I know), but I have seen a couple cars get pulled over - one was a WRX and another was a CRX with 20" exhaust :merli: If they are going after noisy shitboxes, that's great :(

That sounded terrible..

that reminds me, i heard a gtr33 at idle at least 30m away.. and it was pretty loud.. but that was in a sheltered carpark at chadstone, so maybe the echos make it seem louder.

but that, i'm sure will definitely cop a defect.

they havent been targetted since day dot.

like saying vn commo's were always bogan spec single spinner brakie machines.

its the sheer number of skylines on the roads that has caused this problem not the media. particularly 33's when you say skyline 90% of ppl would think 33 over a 32 or 34 as their are lower volume of them getting around

it amazes me how many skylines i see around every single day.

It goes:

Large number of Skylines > Media > Police

The reason I say media are largely responsible is because there have always been a large number of Skylines on the road for 10 years...yet the police and the lawmakers are getting worse and worse in their operations and laws because the media are getting worse in their reports. It was always bad for imports but its much worse than it was 10 years ago.

It goes:

Large number of Skylines > Media > Police

The reason I say media are largely responsible is because there have always been a large number of Skylines on the road for 10 years...yet the police and the lawmakers are getting worse and worse in their operations and laws because the media are getting worse in their reports. It was always bad for imports but its much worse than it was 10 years ago.

I've noticed.

Its much much worse now... I just can't wait till the attention moves to the next "big" thing.

While we are flavour of the month I don't think there is too much we can do - as much as I would like o do something. All you can really do is not be stupid on the roads, even then thats not enough...

So how's this. I get an EPA notice in the mail today...as reported by the cop who got me for my HID headlights earlier this month. He didn't even look at my exhaust system, or listen to it. So now I have to pay $75 to have someone test my car because a cop assumed my exhaust isn't legal and that my car doesn't meet emissions standards. And if my car fails that test, I have to pay $37 for a re-test. Am I supposed to just guess that my car meets the standards and bad luck if I have to re-test?

This place is f**ked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...