Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Who'd be interested.

No dates solid yet but it would be a few months away to give people plenty of time to get organised.

Thinking a Monday late October/early November.

What say you?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/333951-midweek-track-day-winton-100/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gayyyyyy, will be finishing uni for the semester/ studying for exams.

Do it Nov/Dec >_<

The dat eis far from set, and there is quite a number available.

I'm more looking for an idea of who would be keen to do such an event.

It'd be similar to a Fun Day only with 60 cars and midweek.

yeah agree with a few of the others maybe after mid november early dec

also keep in mind they are running a Fun day early december as well from memory

anyways would like to see this go through the Fun Day in july was good but will be a much better day with just us as a club there and who knows i may have my gtst by then be good to take it out on the track

id be keen depending on date/prices

The price, assuming we get 60 entries, would be $100.

And the date could be late November.

I tell ya what, I'll pencil in November 22 as the date.

So, Monday, November 22 - $100 and 60 entries, who would be innerz?

Still keen. But given the "fun day" comments thrown around, I'm assuming this will be an untimed event? Are you also thinking of doing the "fun day" far too many cars on the track at once thing???

So much better when cars are grouped by lap time and limited to 15 on the track at once!

The price, assuming we get 60 entries, would be $100.

And the date could be late November.

I tell ya what, I'll pencil in November 22 as the date.

So, Monday, November 22 - $100 and 60 entries, who would be innerz?

I would def be interested. It would be a gym day but I will make an exception :(

Still keen. But given the "fun day" comments thrown around, I'm assuming this will be an untimed event? Are you also thinking of doing the "fun day" far too many cars on the track at once thing???

So much better when cars are grouped by lap time and limited to 15 on the track at once!

There would be no official timing.

Groups would be either 2x30 or 3x20. Seeing as a fun day would see upwards of 70 card on track, 30 would be great and 20 even better.

Scrutineering would kick off around 8am with cars on track ny around 10-1030am. I think the last session finishes @ 5pm.

What's wrong with the event 9th October?

OCTOBER

9 Sat - SAU Vic Track Club Championship - Winton

Event calendar

If it's a first time do driver training. It's cheaper and you get times as well so you see your improvement.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...