Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes, there are no synchros on reverse (and I think it is straight cut too?) It can be tricky to get first time sometimes, just let the clutch out in neutral then clutch back in and try again

  • 2 weeks later...

^ yea what he said. reverse has no synchro so you must be stopped completely to engage it.

sometimes yea it will seem to not engage even though you've stopped, and often its just that your unlucky and have stopped right at the point where the teeth lockup against each other and wont mesh. if your on any sort of slope, let the car roll half an inch in either direction (or use 1st gear if on level surface and cant roll) then stop and try again. tends to work every time for me.

ive also noticed in some of my cars that are a bit older and start doing this more frequently when the gear stick is at the point where it locks up going into reverse you can get away with letting the clutch out only just enough to kick the input shaft around 1/8 of a turn while you have light pressure on the stick pulling back into reverse and you'll find it slots straight in. carry on

if reverse has no syncros, does that mean 1st doesnt either. when im slowing down to a traffic light i try to put it in first gear while im still rolling and it crunches. so im thinking it doesnt have syncros either??

if reverse has no syncros, does that mean 1st doesnt either. when im slowing down to a traffic light i try to put it in first gear while im still rolling and it crunches. so im thinking it doesnt have syncros either??

Well if it was nineteen sixty soemthing & you were driving an MG then the chances are the gearbox wouldn't have synchros on either first or reverse. But being a vaguely modern car it does atleast have synchros on first.

Well if it was nineteen sixty soemthing & you were driving an MG then the chances are the gearbox wouldn't have synchros on either first or reverse. But being a vaguely modern car it does atleast have synchros on first.

well my gearbox is a nineteen sixty something :)

to engage reverse properly always select a further away gear first. Obviously 5th wont let you into reverse, yet if you select 3rd then 4th before selecting reverse you will get it in without the crunch.

My procedure: Stop, select neutral, shake stick, select 3rd, select 4th, select reverse.

Works every time in all 5 speeders.

Dilmah, dooo try it.

djr81 you mentioned something about a clutch draggin?

I have a kinda scraping noise (very light but still) when the clutch is out in neutral... bearing or dragging clutch?

hey i tihnk i have the same issue, slight noise when out, when clutch in noise goes away, only very feint though, so id like to know what the go is with this to

I think its the throwout bearing , mine does it too, mechanic said dont stress, so i dont...

However when it starts making a scraping noise when you let clutch out slowly in first, its on its way out..

My ute started doing this on thursday :banana:

Edited by Arthur T3
to engage reverse properly always select a further away gear first. Obviously 5th wont let you into reverse, yet if you select 3rd then 4th before selecting reverse you will get it in without the crunch.

this

stop trying to smash reverse while your still moving, unless your doing motorkhana or something theres really no need

clutch up in neutral noise is usually input shaft bearing

clutch in scraping noise is usually thrust bearing

this

stop trying to smash reverse while your still moving, unless your doing motorkhana or something theres really no need

clutch up in neutral noise is usually input shaft bearing

clutch in scraping noise is usually thrust bearing

+11ty to all that

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...