Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Nah no realy benefit, remote turbo set-ups are usually done due to spacing constraints.

Ends up being pretty laggy, but makes similar powar. Also they dont usually need intercoolers cos the piping is soo long, the air looses all its heat on the way back to the motor.

That is a f**king sick car. Sounds porn, looks amazing.

:drool:

Nah no realy benefit, remote turbo set-ups are usually done due to spacing constraints.

Ends up being pretty laggy, but makes similar powar. Also they dont usually need intercoolers cos the piping is soo long, the air looses all its heat on the way back to the motor.

That is a f**king sick car. Sounds porn, looks amazing.

:drool:

Exactly what I was thinking.

The turbo housing should also act as an intercooler as the outside air is blowing onto it.

Instant cooling...

+ this setup seems quite popular in the USA.

Im still not a believer of such setups.

One dude in FI has something similar ATM ("STS" thread)... But with ALL that extra pipe work, there MUST be some delay & lag on that set-up over conventional stuff.

Also add in the extra weight, weight balance all that pipe would come into etc etc.

I think the fact they all usually do it with resonable cube V8's kinda negates it a bit - but you can hear from the video how long the turbos take to get on song

Hence, i ain't convinced.

Very sexy car though.

Im still not a believer of such setups.

One dude in FI has something similar ATM ("STS" thread)... But with ALL that extra pipe work, there MUST be some delay & lag on that set-up over conventional stuff.

Also add in the extra weight, weight balance all that pipe would come into etc etc.

I think the fact they all usually do it with resonable cube V8's kinda negates it a bit - but you can hear from the video how long the turbos take to get on song

Hence, i ain't convinced.

Very sexy car though.

Yeah not exactly responsive, especially for such small turbos.

doesn't matter on that setup though as he's got high comp Lexus V8 power... the turbos would just give more torque/power and fatten out the midrange and top end... he's only running 5psi if I heard correctly

sweet car... pity about the gearbox, sounds slushy changing gears... a manual would be so nice

doesn't matter on that setup though as he's got high comp Lexus V8 power... the turbos would just give more torque/power and fatten out the midrange and top end... he's only running 5psi if I heard correctly

sweet car... pity about the gearbox, sounds slushy changing gears... a manual would be so nice

Yeah i agree with that, still would be much better with a "real" turbo setup though, If it were mine I would just leave it Aspirated.

V160 Conversion wouldn't be too hard they are just a Fat version of an IS250 and bell housings are avaliable to suit the UZ motor

the adgantage is that you don't have to go making up new manifolds, trying to squeeze turbos into tight engine bays with v8 motors, and on NA motors lag won't be that much of an issue. because you don't really need to run much in the way of intercoolers and the turbos aren't massive. you will have some lag though obviously.

an advantage though, epic turbo spool noise coming out the exhaust as it doesn't have to pass through any mufflers after the turbo.

the adgantage is that you don't have to go making up new manifolds, trying to squeeze turbos into tight engine bays with v8 motors, and on NA motors lag won't be that much of an issue. because you don't really need to run much in the way of intercoolers and the turbos aren't massive. you will have some lag though obviously.

an advantage though, epic turbo spool noise coming out the exhaust as it doesn't have to pass through any mufflers after the turbo.

I have been thinking about doing this to my 5ltr NC fairlane for those exact reasons.

H O M O

he def needs more shit carbon everywhere

and shoulda just bought one of these

http://www.turbowhistler.net/

sounds the same

having the turbo in the back seat is plausable . http://speedhunters.com/archive/2010/07/20...k-pink-s14.aspx

80% of the energy the turbo uses comes from exhaust heat

how hot is your manifold ? vs how hot is the exhaust gas at the tip ? you do the math

Edited by lachlanw

how does the turbo use heat? the turbo uses exhaust gas flow. sure the exhaust gas has less density when it is hotter, therefore being a larger volume, but if you take this into account with exhaust size and turbo size you could balance things out a bit. plus there is the advantge of the fact that a byproduct of the turbo is heat, which then reduces power, so having it further away reduces the power loss through hotter intake temps and restrictive intercoolers.

not goin to argue how a turbo works . go read a book instead of the internet

on another note of someone came to me and had lots of money and wanted this id be happy to do it and he is obvoiusly happy with it

there was a huge debate on this on NS a while back. short answer, no.

-increased intercooler piping thus more lag.

-increased risk of turbo damage.

-decreased life span of the turbo. whenever it rains the turbo will be sprayed with water. since the inside of the exhaust hosing will be around 900c yet the outside is being sprayed with cool water, the great temperature difference is likely to cause cracking.

-cheaper, easier and more common to do with the correct way.

Edited by Peter89

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I’m here solo don’t have any hands to help so haven’t hit it with a timing light 
    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
×
×
  • Create New...