Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thanks, but I'm well aware that you've previously posted those results, not really any need for name calling, most of us are adults here

You are the one that name called, and I wasn't saying that was the differences so much as saying you could safely expect at least that much...

You are the one that name called, and I wasn't saying that was the differences so much as saying you could safely expect at least that much...

My post generally stated disbelief at the disparity between roller and hub dynos. 70KW is substantial figure in anyone's language, hence "Nigga please"

My comments weren't aimed at anyone in particular, just a general statement but when simonR32 decided to call me a dickhead, as if I had not read the thread and seen the results posted about, which I clearly had considering they were literally 2 posts above mine, what do you expect me to say ?

I wasn't commenting on what you said at all Lithium but rather generally about SimonR32's post.

as for the dig about dyno figures in perth, the fact that I seem to have touched a nerve speaks volumes, do a forum search and see what comes up, obviously I'm not the only one to make this sort of comment. (Queue 900 people from perth having a sook/teary about this and that dyno being the worlds most accurate"

In the end it comes down to the fact that when I see something I think is a bit odd, I'm going to call it straight up.

This isn't netball, like I said we are all big boys and manners cost nothing, so what's the problem.

I didn't call you a dickhead. I commented that you made yourself look like a dickhead which I think is unusual for you (after reading posts you have made in the past). If I wanted to call you a dickhead I would have, I didn't and I chose my words wisely, so please read it in context.

It must be the air in wa that makes the dynos read high because they are the same dynos with the same calibration and corrections :-)

It's ok though, my shitty 480rwhp seems to keep a few 700rwhp Eastern states GTR's honest :-p

I didn't call you a dickhead. I commented that you made yourself look like a dickhead which I think is unusual for you (after reading posts you have made in the past). If I wanted to call you a dickhead I would have, I didn't and I chose my words wisely, so please read it in context.

It must be the air in wa that makes the dynos read high because they are the same dynos with the same calibration and corrections :-)

It's ok though, my shitty 480rwhp seems to keep a few 700rwhp Eastern states GTR's honest :-p

70kw is a bit much for me I think but between two dynos even with the same corrections anything is possible.

I probably bit a little bit hard over nothing so I'm just willing to chalk this up to miss-communication

and no chance mate, we build our tracks downhill over here :rofl:

I don't really have anything else to add so here is a sweet Miami Vice picture.

miami-vice.jpg

It nearly runs a 10 and two different machines measure its output no doubt on different algorithms and different variables.

Enough sooking, is don is good.

On a plus note.....

My 8374 TS IWG should be shipped this month, So early next month it should be in my hot little hands!! WOOHOO can't wait!!:worship::cheers:

I am getting a Manifold made here for it, So there will be a little wait for that.....I would have loved a Full-Race one, They are a work of art....But it starts to add up getting one from the other side of the world.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

dont know if anyone can confirm this.

But i have been told by a large Aus supplier that BW may be dropping the whole EFR range due to 'internal problems" in that side of the business.

apparently they have spent so much money on R&D , marketing etc and has cost BW lots of money. and the big bosses at BW may scap the whole thing.

i know i ordered a turbo in march this year went back to supplier yesterday and they still cant tell me when one is arriving,

Given the amount of secrecy that seems to follow them I'm surprised such information would have leaked. I mean people won't even say a single turbo shat itself. SIF a full production shut down would get out.

I heard that they were having trouble with there suppliers manufacturing quality control and have had to find a new supplier. If this is correct, that would take a fair while.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...