Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A smaller rear muffler isn't as much of a drop in power as most people think. Gasses have mostly stopped expanding by then and the requirement for flow is less. It will be lower in power but not much and it will also be quieter. I wouldn't use it as a mid muffler!

Off the turbo use a conical reducer to increase the size to 4'' or more. A 5'' can be a little hard to fit but doable. Then use another set of reducers to decrease the size under the firewall. This will also have give more linear power.

In addition an angled rear muffler section will be more linear then one that has an S bend and is mounted straight.

Adding EWG back into mainstream exhaust will mean less overall flow and also introduce turbulence. I.e drop power and increase spool time. Next external WG set up I run im going to try a motorbike Ti muffler, venting externally. It will still be loud, but probably tolerable and might even sound cool/unique. Cracking the gate in day to day driving in traffic, realistically isn't going to happen much. Maybe if you have 4.4's

I would suggest to buy a second hand 4'' cat back. Cut the flange off if its a 3'' and make it add a 4''. Add an additional muffler/resonator, make a dump pipe to suit. Then decide what you want to do with the wastegates

finding an used 4'' is a bit more complicated than 3.5 inch. hence why I was thinking to go 90mm all the way and have the downpipe 100mm ( i never asked my mechanic is thought on going 115mm on the downpipe tho lol!).

so you believe I would be fine with a 90 or actually a 86ish rear muffler ?

I never drove an EWG setup so i dont know if 10-15psi is heard a lot of only a slight psshh can be heard. but obsviouly i can hit 10psi often during shifting :)

How stiff are your gate springs going to be?

The "pssshhh" is BOV noise.

^ yeah just youtube it so you get an idea, should be heaps

You will drop power with a 86mm muffler, maybe as much as 20kw with the turbo your thinking of compared to a 4'' but you will be able to get it much quieter then any (traditional) 4'' even if the majority of your system is 4'' . To give you an idea, you will make atleast another 30kw with a twin 4'' compared to a single 4'', perhaps more but the problem you run into is weight, noise, cost etc. I haven't personally tested a duel 4'' but have seen results on something with only 200kw and its about 12kw at that power level.

The point im making is exhaust size for the first 3'- 4' off the turbo is more critical as it is still expanded (due to heat), after that it starts to cool/contract more and more so size at the rear muffler can be stepped down with less of a power loss.

Looks like your from quebec, you might be best off contacting an agent and buying a used 4'' from Japan auctions.

^ yeah just youtube it so you get an idea, should be heaps

You will drop power with a 86mm muffler, maybe as much as 20kw with the turbo your thinking of compared to a 4'' but you will be able to get it much quieter then any (traditional) 4'' even if the majority of your system is 4'' . To give you an idea, you will make atleast another 30kw with a twin 4'' compared to a single 4'', perhaps more but the problem you run into is weight, noise, cost etc. I haven't personally tested a duel 4'' but have seen results on something with only 200kw and its about 12kw at that power level.

The point im making is exhaust size for the first 3'- 4' off the turbo is more critical as it is still expanded (due to heat), after that it starts to cool/contract more and more so size at the rear muffler can be stepped down with less of a power loss.

Looks like your from quebec, you might be best off contacting an agent and buying a used 4'' from Japan auctions.

yes, I'm from quebec, you said that because of my bad english i suppose ? hihi. But i don't understand what it changes that im from quebec or sydney? can't you buy from yahoo auction in aus? Broker charge A LOT, price + 35% fees + shipping to their container + shipping in canada.. its unreal..

I will def. go with a 100mm downpipe. now I have to decide on my catback. At the end, I'm running a varex that's for sure. either 86mm or the 98mm version. they both seems to cost the same, so price isn't a factor really. But it's easier to find a good muffler/resonator in 90mm than it is in 100mm version lol.

Mechanic said he could fab a 100mm catback for about 800 without muffler/resonator. so I guess if i can find a local 90mm catback for like 300$ with muffler, i will just go with that and save the money for the 86mm varex.

cobraa, please start your own thread.

moderators, this exhaust discussion has nothing to do with the topic.

jeez, your on a powertrip or what lol ?

so matching an exhaust with a fullrace mani + EFR 83/74 1.05 EWG isnt on topic ? IMO, the inlet and outlet of a turbo is a very important part of the turbo itself.

jeez, your on a powertrip or what lol ?

so matching an exhaust with a fullrace mani + EFR 83/74 1.05 EWG isnt on topic ? IMO, the inlet and outlet of a turbo is a very important part of the turbo itself.

Personally I think with a RB26 you should be going for the .92 IWG.

Personally I think with a RB26 you should be going for the .92 IWG.

Here how it happened. I got a good deal on this combo ( saved about 25% off retail). I saw a good deal on the EWG manifold + wastegate locally and while I was browsing ebay, i found a good deal on a brand new EWG 83/74 so i did 1+1.

2) Geoff told me I would be hard-pressed to get more than 630whp with the 0.92. So, I though if my setup is not dialed 100%, iw ould most likely be doing 600whpish ( which, IMO wasn't worth the price asked vs. the performance gain over my -5s.)

I'm getting my head ported + 250 9.15mm camshaft, so it should help with better spool-up. Geoff said he managed to get 13psi at 3400rpm with 3.5 inch catted exhaust and big duration camshaft. so hopefully I could hit the same 1 bar sooner with my mod. :) we'll see !! I'm keen to post result when it happens and share with others. very few efr result on Rbs so I shall post mine.

Here how it happened. I got a good deal on this combo ( saved about 25% off retail). I saw a good deal on the EWG manifold + wastegate locally and while I was browsing ebay, i found a good deal on a brand new EWG 83/74 so i did 1+1.

2) Geoff told me I would be hard-pressed to get more than 630whp with the 0.92. So, I though if my setup is not dialed 100%, iw ould most likely be doing 600whpish ( which, IMO wasn't worth the price asked vs. the performance gain over my -5s.)

I'm getting my head ported + 250 9.15mm camshaft, so it should help with better spool-up. Geoff said he managed to get 13psi at 3400rpm with 3.5 inch catted exhaust and big duration camshaft. so hopefully I could hit the same 1 bar sooner with my mod. :) we'll see !! I'm keen to post result when it happens and share with others. very few efr result on Rbs so I shall post mine.

Fair enough if you are looking for 600+ whp......but obviously it will come at a loss of response.

You are still going for a Full-Race manifold? If not I hope what you are using has dual WGs and not a single one.

Haha, funny that Geoff said it would be 630whp max, that is exactly what mine makes on the .92 (20psi boost at 3400rpm)

Bear in mind that Geoff is running E85, so his numbers are going to be a little irrelevant as he will be able to run a ton more timing than you or I on 98 pump fuel.

Will be interested to see what your results are, what dyno are you getting it tuned on?

It's a shame they don't have the 0.92 in an external gate style housing.

Pretty easy to weld the gate shut and run externals (someone on here has cut it out and done that)

For me it's a shame they don't make a 1.05 internal gate housing.....I like the IWG and how clean the setup is, but the housing is just that little too small for my RB30/26, it's creating a backpressure issue

Edited by Sub Boy32
  • Like 1

Fair enough if you are looking for 600+ whp......but obviously it will come at a loss of response.

You are still going for a Full-Race manifold? If not I hope what you are using has dual WGs and not a single one.

Haha, funny that Geoff said it would be 630whp max, that is exactly what mine makes on the .92 (20psi boost at 3400rpm)

Bear in mind that Geoff is running E85, so his numbers are going to be a little irrelevant as he will be able to run a ton more timing than you or I on 98 pump fuel.

Will be interested to see what your results are, what dyno are you getting it tuned on?

its going on a dynapack 2wd. Tbh, my goal would be 650whp, I would be happy with those figures. and yes my setup id full-race EWG twin scroll manifold + turbosmart 45mm.

its going on a dynapack 2wd. Tbh, my goal would be 650whp, I would be happy with those figures. and yes my setup id full-race EWG twin scroll manifold + turbosmart 45mm.

2wd.....That's cheating! ;)

I'm sure you will 650whp without a problem with a 1.05.

So one 45mm WG?

2wd.....That's cheating! ;)

I'm sure you will 650whp without a problem with a 1.05.

So one 45mm WG?

sorry i didnt answer that but thought it was obvious. full-race mani ONLY makes the EWG version with 2 wastegates so obviously its 2 turbosmart 45mm.

The way I see it: if twin -5s are rated for about 66lbs of air and can make 550-575 on our local 2wd dynapack. I'm pretty sure a 79lbs turbo can make an extra 75whp. My goal is : have -5s response ( or better) with a bit more kick/power to it. I'm pretty sure the 0.92 would be more responsive, but not sure it would really make any more power than a pair of -5s. So I'm just hoping with smaller duration camshaft and cam dialling we will be able to achive what I'm looking for.

  • Like 1

^ I kinda agree with that. The 0.92A/R housing would just bee too restrictive for such a high revving 'large' motor.

I am personally going to go a 1.05A/R as well, but have also been considering a 1.45A/R. It would be only slightly laggier but I can run the turbo to the edge with no back pressure issues. My engine is only 2.2L.

I need your opinion: the 83/74 has a outlet OD of 92mm. so technicly the whole exhaust should be 92mm. Thing is, the varex muffler (3.5inch oval) I wish to run has an inlet OD of 86mm. The exhaust line I wish to run is 88-90mm ( pretty common to see these go for sale at bargain used price)

So right now, I already have a restriction of 6mm at the end. (Unless I go for the 4 inch oval which has an inlet of 98mm, but then the bottlenect would be the exhaust piping at 90mm)

Problem is, I will have to plumb back my EWG which are 2x44mm.. What should I do ? or maybe I'm making a big deal for nothing. I dont know how much of a backpressure the EWG will create.

My original idea was to run a 100mm downpipe, no cat, and then use an off-theshelf true 90mm exhaust piping down to a 86mm varex muffler with the EWG plumbed in the downpipe. ( this would cost me about 1500$ and can be pretty quiet)

easy solution would be to vent to atmo the EWG, but its going to be WAY TOO LOUD for my downtown daily-driving. I was told theres some kind of exhaust that we can use for EWG but didn't find any for sale lol.

Other solution would be to run a 100mm exhaust from DP to muffler, but the cost will easily be 2000-2300 and im not sure how quiet 100mm muffler and resonator are..

your input is appreciated :)

I am going to run a 3.5" (or 4" if I can fit it!!) dump pipe, then when I route the wastegate dumptubes into the rest of the exhaust, jump to a 4" for the whole way with a 4" hotdog. For street duties, I think I would like to go a 3.5" axle back system w/ magnaflow muffler and for track just 4" pipe axleback.

Want to get as much flow as I can.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...