Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

Hi Geoff,

Which would spool better on a 2.8 (full Tomei 2.734 engine) relating to the EFR8374

1/ TS T4 0.92 IWG with TS T4 manifold or

2/ SS T3 0.83 IWG with TS T3 manifold

Presently have Garrett 5s and 9.0:1 compression 260/10.25 procams that runs sweet no surge shuffle what so ever and is quite responsive, just chasing more of it haaa need it more to the left, higher and flatter ! Only have high octane and no syrup where I live.

There are not to many graphs around and the ones I have seen do not seem to come on boost any better than my current setup.

Been through this blog a few times and seen the blue R34 gtr on your website that would be close to mine but you are not showing a decent graph.

I hear though that the transient response is real good.

I use my car mainly on the street and winding hills where I live so enjoy good response and also take it to Suzuka around 3 times a year.

post-113003-0-58935800-1399687456_thumb.jpg

Overrated mate save your money. Your response looks better than an 8374 for sure.

I have never seen a convincing dyno chart for and rb26 or 28 yet even though these things have been out forever.

Will be interesting to see piggazis and Harrisracings when they eventually post a chart.

The thing is efr's on the dyno don't show up there driving experience. Throttle response is night and day different, power before the spool zone is very different, part throttle boost is again much better. You have to drive an EFR equipped car to understand. They just want to spool all the time. I can get 5psi on my little 2ltr WRX at idle just by retarding the timing from 15 to 5 degrees. In the same vein there is a reason why a heap of OEM cars have a low rotational mass ceramic turbine, also why a lot of new OEM cars now use Borg Warner technology, A45 AMG for instance.

http://youtu.be/d16w0PjkEYk

Edited by BoostdR

Hi Geoff,

Which would spool better on a 2.8 (full Tomei 2.734 engine) relating to the EFR8374

1/ TS T4 0.92 IWG with TS T4 manifold or

2/ SS T3 0.83 IWG with TS T3 manifold

Presently have Garrett 5s and 9.0:1 compression 260/10.25 procams that runs sweet no surge shuffle what so ever and is quite responsive, just chasing more of it haaa need it more to the left, higher and flatter ! Only have high octane and no syrup where I live.

There are not to many graphs around and the ones I have seen do not seem to come on boost any better than my current setup.

Been through this blog a few times and seen the blue R34 gtr on your website that would be close to mine but you are not showing a decent graph.

I hear though that the transient response is real good.

I use my car mainly on the street and winding hills where I live so enjoy good response and also take it to Suzuka around 3 times a year.

if swapping only manifold and turbine housing - Twinscroll T4 will spool better when properly implemented. I am generally not a fan of SS T3 for most inline 6 applications. for a street/winding hills setup and occasional Suzuka trip the 8374 could work very well as could 9174 if you wanted a bit more top end power or bragging rights dyno sheet. Have you considered twin EFR6258? that is a great setup also, here is a recent chart from a customer build:

nissan-rb26dett-efr-twin-turbo-kit-1-con

The more I read about these EFR turbo's the more I need to have one. If they made either the 6758 or 7163 in T3 and external waste gate, I'd be upgrading my HKS GT-RS in a heart beat.

the 6758 and 7163 are both available in vband inlet, external WG config. The turbine housings are stainless steel its easy to weld a T3 flange over the Vband inlet. I posted a photo of this somewhere in this thread if you need me to dig it up. these will make a GT-RS seem like a dinosaur

The thing is efr's on the dyno don't show up there driving experience. Throttle response is night and day different, power before the spool zone is very different, part throttle boost is again much better. You have to drive an EFR equipped car to understand. They just want to spool all the time

experience driving an EFR behind-the-wheel is the only way to truly understand how everything works together. People naturally want to measure everything and compare turbos for pissing contests or advertising purposes... and when the only tool you have to do that is a steady-state WOT dyno, the good stuff can be lost. there are many things in life where a chart or an explanation over the internet can not do justice

Overrated mate save your money. Your response looks better than an 8374 for sure.

I have never seen a convincing dyno chart for and rb26 or 28 yet even though these things have been out forever.

Will be interesting to see piggazis and Harrisracings when they eventually post a chart.

it is easy to look at dyno charts, and go on forums where the dyno chart is what matters... outside of forums there is an entire world of racing that does not care about dyno charts. feel free to do some digging:

07-19-Points-Chase-Entering-MidOhio-Std.

7333.jpeg

WTAC_2013_7407-1200x800.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

a little closer to home:

article_trp11.jpg

article_trp3.jpg

http://www.speedhunters.com/2015/06/a-skyline-gt-r-tuning-revolution/

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

Hi Geoff,

I definitely prefer the single over the double so most likely will get the 8374/0.92 IWG. Like the simplicity.

1 question Geoff, do you do a downpipe for that turbo to go to a standard position Cat ( r33 gtr) obviously using your manifold.

Do all my own installations at home but not so good at making downpipes. that would be cool if that is possible.

Cheers Mike

the 6758 and 7163 are both available in vband inlet, external WG config. The turbine housings are stainless steel its easy to weld a T3 flange over the Vband inlet. I posted a photo of this somewhere in this thread if you need me to dig it up. these will make a GT-RS seem like a dinosaur

Geoff,

Can you provide a v-band EFR turbo already modded to T3?

Which in your opinion is a better replacement for the HKS GT-RS, the 6758 or the 7163? I don't want a less responsive turbo, but the 6758 doesn't look like that much more power than the GT-RS.

Thanks

The more I read about these EFR turbo's the more I need to have one. If they made either the 6758 or 7163 in T3 and external waste gate, I'd be upgrading my HKS GT-RS in a heart beat.

Contact Nisspeed. James has made a beautiful t25 to T3 adaptor.

post-49288-14498214032547_thumb.jpg

That turbo looks like it is going to rest on the right side when the engine shifts around.

The picture makes it look like that but there is about 1.75" gap. Can get 17psi just leaning on the OEM stall convertor (c34 Stagea). Lag was obviously a concern with the heavy auto.

if swapping only manifold and turbine housing - Twinscroll T4 will spool better when properly implemented. I am generally not a fan of SS T3 for most inline 6 applications. for a street/winding hills setup and occasional Suzuka trip the 8374 could work very well as could 9174 if you wanted a bit more top end power or bragging rights dyno sheet. Have you considered twin EFR6258? that is a great setup also, here is a recent chart from a customer build:

Hi Geoff, Have you had any results with the EFR 9174 hybrids? i've read the spool performance is only 50-100rpm down on a 8374 but your compressor efficiency moves up the revs a fair bit.

also, i remember seeing spool diverter valve a while ago. is there any plans for Borg Warner to release it for the larger frame exhaust housings?

IMG_6118adj-L.jpg

IMG_6119adj-L.jpg

Edited by burn4005
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...