Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah at street power levels the extra valve train weight is more than made up for by extra valve area and the fact you have dual cams meaning less compromise with valve timing, however is it possible that at extreme rpm of 10-11k which some of these motors see that the extra valve train loss could become an issue, does anyone know if more or less lift can be achieved with single vs twin cam rbs?

Plenty of twincam RB's at 12000RPM+++

Not sure on the lift though although I woulnd't assume so.

Think about it, at higher flow levels the increased area and variability between INLET and EXHAUST with added tuneability becomes an even greater benefit.

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Think about it, at higher flow levels the increased area and variability between INLET and EXHAUST with added tuneability becomes an even greater benefit.

This is what I would have assumed as well, just trying to get an idea about why the records aren't basically the asme, probably has nothing to do with actual power and more to do with the cars.

This is what I would have assumed as well, just trying to get an idea about why the records aren't basically the asme, probably has nothing to do with actual power and more to do with the cars.

Yeah mate, that's pretty much what I've assumed as well.

I'll throw in my 2 cents here.

I own a high comp Tomei 2.8 with a set of decent cams with a pair of GT RS's hanging off the side of it. After driving a 3 litre with -10s (MarkoR1's) and being in N1GTR's car with a very similar setup I would not even look at the 2.6, 2.7 or 2.8 engines. It almost wants me to throw mine in the bin and build a 3 litre + engine. All that rubbish you hear about "30's dont rev" is exactly that.... a load of crap.

I'll throw in my 2 cents here.

I own a high comp Tomei 2.8 with a set of decent cams with a pair of GT RS's hanging off the side of it. After driving a 3 litre with -10s (MarkoR1's) and being in N1GTR's car with a very similar setup I would not even look at the 2.6, 2.7 or 2.8 engines. It almost wants me to throw mine in the bin and build a 3 litre + engine. All that rubbish you hear about "30's dont rev" is exactly that.... a load of crap.

Don't throw it away Paul; just leave it out the front and I will come get it :P

a block in crappy condition in the us goes for a minimum of 1k in the usa, they average around 2k not including machine work, belt, headgaskt, gaskets, and yadda, bare minumum is 5k for a 3 liter block to be operational in the us, i would just do a 2jz...

shipping a whole engine block would cost at least $500 if not more, $1k is probably a pretty accurate outcome for buying a $100 block shipping it there and some markup to make it actually worth while.

Edited by Rolls
I'll throw in my 2 cents here.

I own a high comp Tomei 2.8 with a set of decent cams with a pair of GT RS's hanging off the side of it. After driving a 3 litre with -10s (MarkoR1's) and being in N1GTR's car with a very similar setup I would not even look at the 2.6, 2.7 or 2.8 engines. It almost wants me to throw mine in the bin and build a 3 litre + engine. All that rubbish you hear about "30's dont rev" is exactly that.... a load of crap.

Agreed. A well built/balanced RB30 can rev to 8 and beyond without rattling itself to pieces.

The head and turbo combo is the key for sustaining power all the way up there though.

Mine is going to 8000rpm maybe more if the head allows :whistling:

sadly i think i will never achieve the 3 liter status, if my stroker 2.7 dies, i am going neo and calling it a day lol, i would love to get a rb30 though the two i have seen were ridiclous.

current mods:

t517z turbos

264 greddy cams

trust front/dump pipes

trust PEII cat back exhaust

trust 720cc injectors

power fc d-jetro

os giken twin plate

basically i wana build the ultimate stagea in all aspects power, looks, interior the complete package and wana make 600 hp+ at least to make the wagon really quick due to its weight, it will be a show then street car. the budget i have is approx. 40k for engine.

If you want to build the ultimate Stagea you will have to go north of 600awkw (not 600hp) to beat Psymin's ultimate Stagea. He used a 2.8 stroker kit but bang for buck Rb30 will get youi there cheaper - see Spool or Proengines or RIPs: http://www.ripsltd.com/
If you want to build the ultimate Stagea you will have to go north of 600awkw (not 600hp) to beat Psymin's ultimate Stagea. He used a 2.8 stroker kit but bang for buck Rb30 will get youi there cheaper - see Spool or Proengines or RIPs: http://www.ripsltd.com/

nissanstageapc151fq690x.jpg

"Click."

Edited by dirtyRS4

thanks for all the ideas and advice i will let you know what happens and i know about PSYMIN's stagea and if i wanted to build the ultimate power stagea i would have to go north of 757kw but thats not what i'm after. I'm after a show quality stagea big custom stereo, custom paint and engine with power to back it up so it isnt all show (which i have yet to see anyone do to a stag PSYMIN being the closest). Thanks again for all the help will keep you posted.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
    • Been a busy but productive day. Axle and hubs acquired. All fitted up after a bit of modifying. Need to sort out wider mudguards and running light reflector covers but other than that the trailer is gooood to go !!
×
×
  • Create New...