Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5g4bzr6p0D_YRxsO0Lt_-rNkCg5kA?docId=6194105

BARCELONA, Spain — Lewis Hamilton has warned that McLaren's car isn't quite championship calibre just yet after world champion Sebastian Vettel led testing Wednesday for Red Bull to strengthen its status as early season Formula One favourite.

Vettel set the fastest lap yet of preseason running at the Catalunya Circuit with a quickest time of 1 minute, 21.865 seconds.

Despite teammate Mark Webber being fastest to open the five-day session on Tuesday, Vettel cautioned against putting too much stock into the Austrian team's early results.

"It was a good day and a good time, although to be honest it's difficult to say where we are, as the lap times of the teams are all over the place," Vettel said. "We have had no major problems with reliability throughout testing and the speed looks good as far as we can judge. But I think we have to wait until after Melbourne — maybe in Malaysia or China — to really see where we are."

Hamilton was fourth, just over one second behind Vettel, after his session was cut short by an exhaust problem.

"Do I believe I have a car to win the world championship at the moment? I don't, no," said Hamilton, the 2008 champion. "But that doesn't mean it won't become a world championship-winning car.

"As long as we keep pushing in the right direction with the development and the new things we have coming several races down the line, hopefully they will enable us to close the gap and compete for wins. As long as we pick up a good few points in the first few races, then we won't be miles behind."

Hamilton isn't panicking, as McLaren has been known to be one of the best teams at developing a car through a season.

"This is testing. This is what it's all about, finding where your weaknesses are so you can build on them and fix them," said the Briton. "It was a bit on and off today, it wasn't a great day for us. But in terms of how the car felt, there was an improvement with some of the upgrades we have. So that is at least a positive, it's not all negative."

McLaren welcomed Pedro De la Rosa back into the team as reserve driver after the Spaniard left the British team to drive for Sauber last season. Sauber replaced De la Rosa with current Renault driver Nick Heidfeld after 14 races.

Toro Rosso driver Sebastien Buemi was nearly half-a-second behind Vettel ahead of Renault's Vitaly Petrov, while Ferrari driver Felipe Massa was fifth in 1:23.324 as the Italian team tested a new exhaust system.

Spanish outfit HRT named Tonio Liuzzi its second driver behind Narain Karthikeyan on Wednesday, with the Italian expected to take the wheel later this week.

Testing continues through Saturday with the season opening at the Australian Grand Prix on March 27.

Copyright © 2011 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.

god what a surprise. hamilton is already whinging about his car performance and he hasn't even started a race yet. I bet that feels great for the guys who have worked their arses off over the off season to deliver him a new car. he really is a crybaby. webber was more upbeat than that when he was in a farken minardi!

Just received an email..... would be cool to attend I reckon.

Hi Ben you farkin stunner,

Please find attached an invitation to 'An Audience with Mark Webber' proudly presented by Swisse.

This exclusive event is being held on Thursday 24th March at Tonic Bar, Crown Promenade Hotel.

Tickets are on sale now by clicking here, 100% of proceeds are being donated to the Flood Relief efforts in both Queensland and Victoria.

This will be Mark's last public appearance before the Qantas Australian Grand Prix and we would love to have you attend.

Entertainment for the night will include live music, memorabilia auction and a panel discussion with Mark and some special guests...

An Audience with Mark Webber Invitation

Edit: $250 a head.

Edited by Marlin

god what a surprise. hamilton is already whinging about his car performance and he hasn't even started a race yet. I bet that feels great for the guys who have worked their arses off over the off season to deliver him a new car. he really is a crybaby. webber was more upbeat than that when he was in a farken minardi!

Surely they'd hardly talk it up would they? If you came out an said "The car is wicked, we're going to lap everyone and nevah lose...." you'd look like a bit of a arse hat?

Surely they'd hardly talk it up would they? If you came out an said "The car is wicked, we're going to lap everyone and nevah lose...." you'd look like a bit of a arse hat?

well yeah but he is just obviously setting up his excuse book for later in the season when it all falls apart. he could at least be a bit positive saying he's "happy with the progress and car looks to be competitive and besides we've got lots more development to come over the year". something like that would be a bit more suitable. he's just a massive whinger. always has been.

Was it DC or MW that did Harbour Bridge a few years ago. They were meant to do 100km/hmax but they covered it on 6 seconds or something with plenty of noise...so werent in 1st gear :)

The difference now is that since Lewis and his incident last year, the FIA now have the power to pull a Super Licence if an F1 driver gets in trouble with local law enforcement on the road :(

like the aussie top gear(yes i watched it) where they run the V8 supercar over the sydney harbour bridge...was expecting something cool, but it was quite dull, speed limit all the way.....and the lead up to it was even more boring. i think it took em 3 or more hrs to do 15 km's....

Just read this article about Bernie and the AGP. It sounds like he's sympathetic, but you know Bernie, he's a hard bastard. Would YOU cancel Spa? Not me.

I don't understand Mr. Mayor. Can't he see that the wider economic benefits far outweigh the outlay for the race? Can you imagine the outcry from the hotels, shops and businesses that are flat-out during GP week? The race has its costs but surely, surely it's worth it.

I like the bit where Bernie says, "Melbourne is as important as Monaco", though. He'd hardly drop Monaco.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...