Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yep but only because Vettel shut the door on him and Webber wisely gave it up... he was going to pass him at some stage so team orders don't make any sense... you can look at it from either position, tell Webber to stay back or tell Vettel to move over... or just let nature take its course and actually entertain the viewer for a change... I thought it was great seeing Mark have a go

yeah me and Bernie go way back............. just adds another dimension, its great watching the teams scramble and think on their feet... and really it brings out driver talent

they should just combine F1 and WRC... put some gravel tyres on the F1's and let 'em loose through the trees... shit I'd pay to watch every race;)

somewhat unrelated, but the mp4-12c has apprently done quite well around the top gear track

depending in what spec they're talking about, it may have topped the board

at least tehy're topping something eh

I wish that episode of Top Gear would hurry up and get broadcast

............................................................

So when are they actually allowed to race? That all said, Mark has himself to blame, even allowing for having the slippery side of the track (rubbered in racing line in the wet is worse then dirty side in the wet) he should have gotten away better and been leading Vettel...not chasing

Agree. Mark lost the start to Vettel, I think he is getting a bit desperate.

I think rbr should have asked vettel to move over, I mean he's practically won this year's wdc so rbr could make it a 1-2 in the wdc, since Webber, alonso, button and Hamilton are essentially playing for 2nd assuming vettel doesn't dnf the next 5 gp's.

Come on rbr make it a little more interesting :)

Harry, not from this season but makes the point, his philosophy has nothing to do whether team orders are legal or not....its how he views the sport....

of course it matter if team orders are legal. they're hardly going to admit to using team orders when they're illegal.

you don't see them going on about it this year now that orders are all above board.

and despite the team owner's protestations, they clearly did use team orders last year, as has pretty much every other team in history.

at that stage of the race with no chance of cathing the 1st place guy or being caught by the 4th place guy, and seperated by 5 seconds (or whatever it was) with 5 laps to go, they should have just settled in to conserve their engines and boxes. I don't see anything wrong with the engineers telling them that. probably happens all the time without anyone hearing about it. Its only newsworthy because Mark ignored them and made an issue of it.

Its only newsworthy because Mark ignored them and made an issue of it.

MW didn't make an issue of it, he was asked a question and he answered it straight.

It's newsworthy because the media likes to stir shit and because the rest of us like to see drivers racing each other.

I think with half the season yo go 3 points is 3 points and Webber is yet to outscore Vettel in a single race. There is a strong chance Vettel will have a DNF before seadons end and one poor result. Webber neefs to win and take a few points out of him when he can...if he gives up the points chase now then he doesnt deserve a seat in the WDC team.

And Webber and Vettel have shared the track and positions at plenty of GPs. It has only ended in tears once in 2.5 seasons. Let them race as McLaren and Renault do

If you add in the Torro Rosso time for SV then you can add one more 'end in tears' moment in Japan while driving behind the safety car.

The world champ has a history of running into MW. No wonder Horner wanted to maintain the gap. :rofl2:

They will all be friends by Germany :3some:

the mp4-12c has apprently done quite well around the top gear track

depending in what spec they're talking about, it may have topped the board

1:16.2- Very nearly 3 seconds faster than an Enzo and a 458

The only thing that's been around quicker on road-legal rubber is the Ariel Atom V8

I think with half the season yo go 3 points is 3 points and Webber is yet to outscore Vettel in a single race. There is a strong chance Vettel will have a DNF before seadons end and one poor result. Webber neefs to win and take a few points out of him when he can...if he gives up the points chase now then he doesnt deserve a seat in the WDC team.

The points chase situation is this -

Mark is 80 points behind

There are 10 races to go.

So Mark needs 8 points more per race.

Points for each race are: 25 18 15 12 10 8 6 4 2 1

So basically, Webber need to win every remaining GP and have Vettel finish 3rd in at least 4 of those races! If Webber finishes 2nd, Vettel needs to finish 5th!

but as you say Webber has yet to beat Vettel at all, and Vettel has yet to finish worse than 2nd, whereas Webber is a solid 3rd to 4th place finisher this year. And we're basically half way through the season... you're asking alot.

So you're right, Webber basically needs Vettel to have a few retirements, while Mark has none. I just don't see Vettel being any more likely to have DNF's than Webber.

Edited by hrd-hr30

1:16.2- Very nearly 3 seconds faster than an Enzo and a 458

The only thing that's been around quicker on road-legal rubber is the Ariel Atom V8

yer but the stig should 'know the mclaren well'

^ cwutididthar

I just don't see Vettel being any more likely to have DNF's than Webber.

I dont think for a second that Webber has a shot at the title. But if he stops trying to win or beat a slower car in front then I want to see him hang up the helmet.

Something I have always said about Webber, and like about him is if his performances are not up to par he generally looks at what has to be done and goes about improving. He doesnt do a JV, Hill, Button etc and blame the car. So he has to keep on pushing and believing that he can bridge the gap and on his day beat the other guy.

Years ago MS crashed and broke a leg and missed races. More recently Perez crashed and missed races. Alonso had a hell of a 2nd half of the year and almost won the WDC. I dont think Webber has a shot, but if Vettel bins it like he did in the sphincter of the universe and Canada and bangs up his leg etc...then who knows. You got to keep pushing and get the maximum result...being an Aussie it may be the only way he will win it is when someone else throws it away :)

...and will have to agree to disagree re team orders. After the legality of team orders was announced last year the owner of Red Bull publically made a point to come out and say we will never be Ferrari, we believe in the sporting aspects of F1 and will never adopt team orders. Pretty clear in my book what he think the basis of his team is about. Shame with their success they are now just another political machine full of spin and BS :(

Come on Danielson in the HRT. I know what shirt I am buying next weekend in Germany :)

I feel Webber loses races on his own - due to his poor starts. He just cant seem to start the RBR fassssst off the line, always seems to bog down & lose position(s).

Hopefully the team orders saga gets Webber thinking about moving on. Id LOVE to see MW taking Massas seat at Ferrari....

I just don't see Vettel being any more likely to have DNF's than Webber.

Both Vettel and RBR are dead certs now for taking out their respective championships again.

Lock it in Eddie; there's no need to phone a friend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you say your cams are 272/262 is that 272in and 262ex?
    • We're arguing semantics. I am saying 45 accel and a 55 deccel ramp are "2 ways". Even a 45 degree ramp and an 89 degree ramp is "2 ways", because it is literally... two ways. The cusco 55/30 ramp is a 2 way. It's two ways. I get it though - in normal nomenclature a "2 way" would be 45/45 or 55/55 or 60/60 i.e the same locking in both directions. And something like 45/65 would be considered "1.5 way". I would then say if we're getting into the nitty gritty then every locking diff is a "2 way" diff and we should not speak in 1.5, or 2 ways but ramp angles instead. Which ofc if one of those ramp angles is 90deg, that side is not doing any locking. :p So Nismo don't obviously sell 3 things. The fact of the matter that they only sell two items really goes to show that there's a 2 way and a "1,5 way" which is really a 1 way. I believe the actual lockup for the 'adjustability' of the GT pro is really just setting preload for when the ramps actually start locking up. It's not changing how much 'wayness' there is. It is (somehow) horribly explained. People just buy whatever diff and go "locks up good bruh" and that's what ends up on socials forever.  
    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
×
×
  • Create New...