Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I don't think it really matters if it's a Turbo or N/A. I think you need to shift within the maximum torque rang. If the engine is going to detonate,,,then you have built rubbish and the builder should sell home vacuum cleaners door to door.

That where the power is,,,so use it!!!.

The Radical is a prime example,,,Eastern Creek is a pain in the arse. While I need as much straight line speed as I can get,,,the biggest corner I have trouble with is turn 6. I come out of 5 flat out and either need to change to 5th or hold 4th way past what I should. My fastest laps are when I change to 5th because it's in my torque range. Basically I've used all my pulling power and no amount of revs are going to get me there any quicker,,,sure it sounds like it is,,,but that's a crap lap.

So in summary,,,there's a lot to be said about not only using the torque curve,,,but also your diff ratio's. Skylines would be much quicker if you could change them to suit both E/C and Wakie of which I'll bet nobody does.

Cheers

Neil.

IIRC You want to shift for the maximum torque AT THE WHEELS, so the shift point will depend on how fast the engine torque curve is dropping off, and how much multiplication factor you will loose by shifting up to the next gear. You could plot the wheel torque for each gear (from the engine torque and gearing) then the intersection points will be where you want to shift. I would guess the shift point will be slightly different for each gear (unless that's how gear ratios are chosen)

Re Tune, detonation at peak torque just means that not enough timing has been pulled out, so its just a bad tune. There's no reason to avoid chasing max torque. More boost (or greater volumetric efficiency) = less timing.

SO just grabbing the first dyno sheet i could off Forced Induction...

Am i right in understanding that people are saying the thing should be changing gears at 6,000rpm to make sure its in the meat of the torque curve when it falls a few rpm for the next gear? I dont agree...but thats fine... :)

post-462-0-57576100-1291934182_thumb.jpg

almost. My understanding is that you want to drive your car so that you spend the most amount of time with the most amount of torque.

My car makes peak torque at 5000rpm and holds it till 6500 before starting to taper off. So i shift at just past 7500 because that puts me back into peak torque for most gears

For my car with my gear/diff ratio's/tyres:

Gear Change RPM drop (change @7200) RPM drop (change @7500)

-------------------------------------------------------------

1 -> 2 -3023 (to 4177) -3149 (to 4351)

2 -> 3 -2486 (to 4714) -2589 (to 4911)

3 -> 4 -1906 (to 5294) -1985 (to 5515)

4 -> 5 -1728 (to 5472) -1800 (to 5700)

Gear Change RPM drop (change @7700) RPM drop (change @8500)

-------------------------------------------------------------

1 -> 2 -3233 (to 4467) -3569 (to 4931)

2 -> 3 -2658 (to 5042) -2934 (to 5566)

3 -> 4 -2038 (to 5662) -2250 (to 6250)

4 -> 5 -1848 (to 5852) -2040 (to 6460)

Remember power and torque have a direct relationship. P = (Torque x RPM) / 5252. You aren't going to be in your peak torque range without having most of your power coming on. For the dyno sheet you posted, it makes peak torque at 4000rpm and holds most of it until about 5600 when it starts to slowly taper off. It also makes 75% of its power at 4krpm. So the most effective powerband would be 4000 -> just shy of 7krpm (pretty obvious for what looks to be a mildly modified engine). You then pick your shift points so that you stay in that power band.

Well, thats what i've been taught anyway :O

you don't have enough power until you can chirp second :D

seriously? get them to tune it to maximum mid range power at whatever boost that is, then set the boost 30% lower and enjoy years of trouble free track days :D

Just go for a nice linear curve at about 16psi on std pulp with minimal knock. Then make sure you always run it on fresh pulp with some octane booster as a buffer and you will have the engine for a long time if you look after it.

where is this idea coming from that the tune will change where the motor makes power? your setup will determine the toruqe curve, tune it to make sure its safe, while still making decent torque.

how much power on the street? depends entirely on your ability to steer

power @ track: take from a race car driver whose name eludes me atm: "you have enough power when you can leave two black lines from the corner exit to the braking point of the next corner".

drag strip: you can only have too little traction, never too much hp

power @ track: take from a race car driver whose name eludes me atm: "you have enough power when you can leave two black lines from the corner exit to the braking point of the next corner".

Tlley in his Camaro would be the only driver that comes to my mind.

Cheers

Neil.

where is this idea coming from that the tune will change where the motor makes power? your setup will determine the toruqe curve, tune it to make sure its safe, while still making decent torque.

That would be the adjustable cam gears...

almost. My understanding is that you want to drive your car so that you spend the most amount of time with the most amount of torque.

My car makes peak torque at 5000rpm and holds it till 6500 before starting to taper off. So i shift at just past 7500 because that puts me back into peak torque for most gears

For my car with my gear/diff ratio's/tyres:

Gear Change RPM drop (change @7200) RPM drop (change @7500)

-------------------------------------------------------------

1 -> 2 -3023 (to 4177) -3149 (to 4351)

2 -> 3 -2486 (to 4714) -2589 (to 4911)

3 -> 4 -1906 (to 5294) -1985 (to 5515)

4 -> 5 -1728 (to 5472) -1800 (to 5700)

Gear Change RPM drop (change @7700) RPM drop (change @8500)

-------------------------------------------------------------

1 -> 2 -3233 (to 4467) -3569 (to 4931)

2 -> 3 -2658 (to 5042) -2934 (to 5566)

3 -> 4 -2038 (to 5662) -2250 (to 6250)

4 -> 5 -1848 (to 5852) -2040 (to 6460)

Remember power and torque have a direct relationship. P = (Torque x RPM) / 5252. You aren't going to be in your peak torque range without having most of your power coming on. For the dyno sheet you posted, it makes peak torque at 4000rpm and holds most of it until about 5600 when it starts to slowly taper off. It also makes 75% of its power at 4krpm. So the most effective powerband would be 4000 -> just shy of 7krpm (pretty obvious for what looks to be a mildly modified engine). You then pick your shift points so that you stay in that power band.

Well, thats what i've been taught anyway :O

Perfect summary here:

http://www.allpar.com/eek/hp-vs-torque.html

FYI @15lb

2.5 cat is holding it back, with a better sized exhaust it should hold the torque better Ive been told, 3.5 inch from dump back will be coming over the next few days.

Thanks for all the info guys.

  • 2 weeks later...

and you said it was a nooby question!

Good work! thats my goal to hit 300awkw in the stag. almost there too! :D I think anything above that for me is pointless. its a wagon FFS! :D

have you got a write up of mods anywhere??

You'll have to drive and see. There is simply no other way to know what will be right. Tune it, track it and you will find a whole pile of issues that you will want to address.

Suspension will play a major part as will weight, power, torque, lag, brakes etc.

But you will enjoy getting it sorted so start enjoying!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...