Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

B-Man do you know the specs of the turbo and its rated power from HKS? What engine internals have you had done?

Internals - Forged Arias pistons, Cryotempered everything else.

I think HKS rate the 3040 at 500 ps - I dunno how they do that when the exhaust housing options are 0.72 through to 1.12.......

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Internals - Forged Arias pistons, Cryotempered everything else.

 

I think HKS rate the 3040 at 500 ps - I dunno how they do that when the exhaust housing options are 0.72 through to 1.12.......

think they actually go down to 0.61, as all the hks GT30s use the same turbine housing.

Love it B-Man, good power. Do/will you have power runs at lower boost pressures, say 14-17psi for daily driving etc?

The reason I ask is that I have a hybrid internal gate Garrett GT3040, which has a slightly different exhaust wheel to HKS as well as 0.60 A/R comp and 0.63 A/R exh, but otherwise sort-of close. I get 265rwkW at 17psi with all other engine bits totally stock.

Would be nice to know your power at LOWER boost as it might help me predict what might happen when I boost it to 20-22psi later with other bolt-on stuff optimised, like exh manifold, cams etc.

Don't want to push it just yet as I have stock pistons.

Also do you ahev stock cams? If so, 323 is awsesome.

Freebaggin: im no expert but I thought the garrent turbos were out of their effiency range at 20-22 PSI, I could be wrong, but I thought thats was where the difference was between your HKS and garrent turbos? Garrents make their power on lower boost and HKS make theirs up higher?

Sumo

Freebaggin - no sorry mate no low boost Dyno reading as yet.

Cams are 256/9 Tomei with Exhaust cam gear. A/F ratios not on this dyno sheet, but will get them on final tuned dyno graph.

Sewid - not back yet - had to go back for new clutch - too much power...... ;)

CHeers, ;)

Joel, if you go the smallest housing, you will most probably either spend alot of time going sideways in the traffic, or alot of time driving around with low boost

i totally agree there.

im going .82 on my gt3040 ... speak of the devil should arrive today.

Wicked Results though B-Man.

All your woes are finally turning into GOES for a change! :zap:

Freebaggin: im no expert but I thought the garrent turbos were out of their effiency range at 20-22 PSI, I could be wrong, but I thought thats was where the difference was between your HKS and garrent turbos? Garrents make their power on lower boost and HKS make theirs up higher?

Sumo

Garretts run fine at high boost.

Thanks B-Man for info.

Garretts run fine at high boost.

Thanks B-Man for info.

Laggy compared to a zed, YES.

Compared to a GTR not so much. We have over layed dyno graphs from GTR's we have recently done and one with N1 turbo's and Tomei cams etc was a little more responsive low in revs, but not much. B- Mans Skyline had more mid range and top end. With more to tune yet.

Single Trubo with higher comp than RB26.

Joel, if you go the smallest housing, you will most probably either spend alot of time going sideways in the traffic, or alot of time driving around with low boost

As long as it comes on hard by 3500rpm i'm not worried what sized exhaust a/r it is.

.82 a/r should do it by 3500rpm on the 3ltr.

Nice results.

I just reeled off 256rwkw at 1 bar with a garrett 3040 with 0.82 rear housing and it makes power just likes yours bman. 3000-3500 around 7psi and then from just below 4000rpm 1 bar all the way to redline. I was just using a 1 bar spring in my external gate to control boost. I am hoping to run a few more psi also and see what she can do, but i still got stock internals.

As for garretts having a low psi efficience range, u should talk to the vl boys down at mel who are running over 2 bar with their garretts and running 9 sec passes, i think they will disagree with you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...