Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hurry up an do it, so I can see your results so I can do it with mine lol

Edit - I should be doing mine next year, but will keep the boost down to save the standard auto.

I'm still thinking the Kando Td06-20g Will suit me better as full boost at 4500 is a little laggy through the auto imo

they also make a TD06H...

these all come with the 10cm rear

KINUGAWA TD06H -20G Turbocharger

Compressor wheel: 52.5 / 68 mm

Turbine Wheel: 58.8 / 67 mm

KINUGAWA T67-25G Turbocharger with T3 Flange

Comp. Whee: 60.2/78mm (25G)

Turbine Wheel: 54 / 61 mm (11 Blades)

KINUGAWA TD06SL2 -20G Turbocharger

Compressor wheel: 52.5 / 68 mm

Turbine Wheel: 54.1 / 61 mm

how would the td06h compare to the td06l2?

Edited by battery

Interesting thing is a GTX3071R flows 10% more than a GT3076R at most boost levels you'd run on an RB25 - imagine one of those on an ethanol blend on an RB25.... expensive, but I can't think of a combination with a fatter streetable power delivery potential.

Without a doubt! All signs point to it being a awesome turbo... They were released only a few days after I purchased my T67 :(

Still as you said fairly expensive!!!

I thought Nytsky made 427rwkw on E85 from a GT35R

Yeah not sure why some people seem to struggle with the GT3582Rs in Oz, one of my mates did 10.6 and had cracked 130mph in a full weight R33 GTS25t running 20psi on BP98 with a GT35R with less than perfect runs - to avoid dyno comparisons its probably worth observing that it has to surely be making a reasonable amount of power?

Really hoping the same car will be tuned on E85 with a PT6765 soon...

My plan was to buy the TD06-L2 and later use my TD07S comp housing and wheel to make a T67, that plan went to shit when some flamin mongrel stole the TD07 :(

Still might do it (the L2) and later buy the billet 25G comp wheel and a port shrouded comp cover to make the T67-25G

385rwkws on pump with a standard cammed/head Rb25 and GT35R? that would have to be the most insane result Ive ever seen, hub dyno or not

Guilt-toy did 370rwkw or so on 20psi with a GT35

3ltr admittadly but it was a stock 25 head.

Im trying to remember but i think he made very close to his E85 power on PULP, because I remember him saying that the standard cams were holding him back once he switched over.

Either way both his and R33_racers were Rb30s which will help power.

I actually love GT3076R's! The cost put me off because it would have been at least a extra $1200ish cost over the top of this turbo and I'm jewish

So I figured saving a lot of money, loosing a few hundred rpm of response and gaining some top end was worth it :)

Actually as you can see from my graph if we revved the old girl to 8500 it would probably come close to 550hp where the 3076R with cams was already starting to fall over.

yeah they will happily make power to 9000rpm on your setup :)

Remember the dyno dymanics stuff always looks more responsive as the extra weight of the rollers adds extra load, we just spent a fair amount of time liaising with another shop and found the normal baseline run we do of 9sec from say 1500-7000 has less low end load applied. So its more equivalent to 12-13 seconds.

I would like to see someone try the Kando T67 with one of the billet wheels I linked up earlier. should bring boost on earlier and carry on in the top end a little more

we did some comparos (billet vs std)with the T88-gk years ago as they originally came with billet compressor wheels, before tooling was finished for the normal comp wheels. There was minimal difference except for production cost.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...