Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

has anyone tried the Kando Dynamic TD06L2-20g 10cm rear on an rb25 yet?

I have an adapter to run an external gate on the stock manifold and i just want to hit 280rwkw, im thinking the L2 may fall short?

They are about $800 delivered from Kando, I am itching to buy one.

To note, the T67 wheel and 10cm housing OBVIOUSLY has no power restriction (ref Simons results) and results for the td06sl2-20g can be seen on more evos than you can poke a stick at.

Evos generally do not struggle to make 260AWKW from the said turbo on a 10.5cm rear housing and are generally on full song by 4500rpm with epic spool before that also.

The fastest evo I have driven had a td06sl2-20g 10.5cm and 272 cams, it would out rev the motor and had some serious pull from about the 3000rpm range, it had made 280AWKW on that setup and featured in a magazine. Others have made over 300awkw on these turbos with E85.

Might I add we have seen Roy get 260rwkw from an RB20 of all motors on one of these turbos, with VERY acceptable spool. An RB25 would possibly spool one of these better than your average highflow.

I have a feeling that we are fools for overlooking these turbos. I really am looking at grabing one for my 1J and having an all out balistic sub 300rwkw setup. The price of my turbo, manifold and gate will rival the cost of a garrett on its own.

Sorry for the Hijack Simon, Im going to put together a thread some time with links to your own results (for ref to the T67 rear and 10cm housing) along with evo results (for ref of the T67 combined with 20g front on a itty bitty 2L) very soon.

I have ordered a t67 to go with my 6boost and 44mm tial...

Came to this decision over the td06l2 cause of posts on a

Subaru forum where the concensuss was that the L2 was too small for the 2.5l boxer engine

See how I go if it's too laggy ill just swap on a td06l2

They are about $800 delivered from Kando, I am itching to buy one.

To note, the T67 wheel and 10cm housing OBVIOUSLY has no power restriction (ref Simons results) and results for the td06sl2-20g can be seen on more evos than you can poke a stick at.

Evos generally do not struggle to make 260AWKW from the said turbo on a 10.5cm rear housing and are generally on full song by 4500rpm with epic spool before that also.

The fastest evo I have driven had a td06sl2-20g 10.5cm and 272 cams, it would out rev the motor and had some serious pull from about the 3000rpm range, it had made 280AWKW on that setup and featured in a magazine. Others have made over 300awkw on these turbos with E85.

Might I add we have seen Roy get 260rwkw from an RB20 of all motors on one of these turbos, with VERY acceptable spool. An RB25 would possibly spool one of these better than your average highflow.

I have a feeling that we are fools for overlooking these turbos. I really am looking at grabing one for my 1J and having an all out balistic sub 300rwkw setup. The price of my turbo, manifold and gate will rival the cost of a garrett on its own.

Sorry for the Hijack Simon, Im going to put together a thread some time with links to your own results (for ref to the T67 rear and 10cm housing) along with evo results (for ref of the T67 combined with 20g front on a itty bitty 2L) very soon.

Thread is about Kando/Kinugawa/Kamak turbos not my results, so any results you have feel free to stick them up on here :)

I have ordered a t67 to go with my 6boost and 44mm tial...

Came to this decision over the td06l2 cause of posts on a

Subaru forum where the concensuss was that the L2 was too small for the 2.5l boxer engine

See how I go if it's too laggy ill just swap on a td06l2

The TD06SL2 is the same wheel as the T67 Simon is running.

The turbo you noted prior is the exact turbine wheel and exhaust housing.

Simon has made 410rwkw with it, no restriction.

Maybe the Subaru boys were refering to a different wheel, not the SL2.

The TD06SL2 is the same wheel as the T67 Simon is running.

The turbo you noted prior is the exact turbine wheel and exhaust housing.

Simon has made 410rwkw with it, no restriction.

Maybe the Subaru boys were refering to a different wheel, not the SL2.

Yeah the TD06SL2 has the same exhaust wheel and housing as a T67 but with 20g compressor and housing to suit. I would still think a T67 would be better on a RB25 and the SL2 for a RB20

410kw was a little bit of a piss take with correction on... More realistically it makes 390kw on a hub dyno and 360rwkw on a dyno dynamics roller :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...