Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

in the exact post you replied to he said they are both 99 ron lol

Tony de you would probably find that the 5% ethanol wouldnt be that great... while ethanol has good ping resistance it is only seen in high quantities thus far, and it will probably be more consistent for u to run straight 99 as the ethanol will result in a leaner burn.

The E5 is also more likely to be a lower grade fuel and the RON bump is from the ethanol, again probably a mask in this case.

I would like to see atleast an E10 variant added to regular PUMP (98 RON in OZ case). Price would stay about the same but we could pick up some ping resistance and have a better RON rating.

so if i want 300rwkw out of a rb25

what would be better one of this kando turbos

or a garrett gt3076r 56t with 44mm external gate

both on a low mount without cams but all supporting mods

with bp98 fuel

Edited by jet2nv

ive had a read through it but theres over 100 pages from what ive seen i think im gonna go a 3076 just wanted some peoples opinions

Peoples opinion on what? a gt 3076 (which one??) or kando? or vs a kando? or vs a NA civic?

be more descriptive mang

Edited by Rolls

Peoples opinion on what? a gt 3076 (which one??) or kando? or vs a kando? or vs a NA civic?

be more descriptive mang

if you read the previous 2 post you would see what im asking i know theres different types of kando and 3076 but i want to know which oneis better for my stated power goal

For 300kw you will need a T67 from kando or the 3076.

The 3076 is likely to be 'more responsive', but once on full song it appears the T67 walks away and ends up with more power.

As a rule of thumb on 98 you should expect 280-300 from the 3076 or 300-330 from the T67 on roughly 20psi each. If you are planning to go external gate you should probably just take the T67 as they are freaking cheap but if u want internal you must get a 3076.

You can also look at a hypergear G3 (much cheaper than both of the above and is also a solid performer - close to 3076 numbers a little laggier).

yeah im extremely familar with stao and his turbos ive know him since he first started and tried ALOT of his different turbos yes they make good power reliable cheap but im more concerned about resale and response the turbo from stao which is very close to the gt3076r is pretty much the same price i get the gt3076 for i already have a dump pipe braided lines and everything ready for the garrett

so yeah i could sell it all and try but after trying a g3 and a gt3071 and the 3071 making 280 and super responsive i think the 3076 is the smarter way to go unless someone here has tried all 3 maybe lol as most motors/dynos are different

For 300kw you will need a T67 from kando or the 3076.

The 3076 is likely to be 'more responsive', but once on full song it appears the T67 walks away and ends up with more power.

As a rule of thumb on 98 you should expect 280-300 from the 3076 or 300-330 from the T67 on roughly 20psi each. If you are planning to go external gate you should probably just take the T67 as they are freaking cheap but if u want internal you must get a 3076.

You can also look at a hypergear G3 (much cheaper than both of the above and is also a solid performer - close to 3076 numbers a little laggier).

I dunno but the HG SS2 also looks to be in GT3076R territory, just my opinion..

A TD06H-25G is bigger than a T67. I may be going one of these on my Rb30. Just trying to decide on what config I will go. IE 10 or 12cm turbine housing, TD06 or TD07 compressor housing, Port shrouded or unshroaded and cast or billet compressor wheel.

any 1 wanna put there POV forward?

Edited by urtwhistle

A TD06H-25G is bigger than a T67. I may be going one of these on my Rb30. Just trying to decide on what config I will go. IE 10 or 12cm turbine housing, TD06 or TD07 compressor housing, Port shrouded or unshroaded and cast or billet compressor wheel.

any 1 wanna put there POV forward?

12cm for Rb30....

cheers

darren

how laggy would a gt3582 with a anti-surge a/r70 wuth a .63 rear be compared to a gt3076r .82 if my goal is only 300-310rwkw max

welcome to the kando dynamic thread, where we talk about kando dynamic turbos.

Please ask a question about a kando product or go to the Garrett thread. There are a number of threads dedicated to gt30 based turbos where your question would be entirely relevant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...