Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But has it been setup to apply pressure to both sides of the diaphragm? It's unlikely but it's quick and easy to check, could have been overlooked?

thats how i set it up initially but the tuner said it wasn't needed.

i dont know if he changed it, jez asked me to check this as well.

i will find all out tomorrow.

okay i just spoke to my tuner and its getting vac from top port and side port (how i set it up initially)

he says it won't be the spring cause they can generally hold boost when set with a EBC/MBC to double their rated pressure (1 bar spring = 2bar boost on ebc/mbc)

im still gonna try Jez's gate with 20psi spring and see how it goes, if that fails, i will try his profec B 2 unit and hope for the best.

he still believe it has something to do with the mani or turbo as everything else "seems" to be ok, if it does fix the issue with either the above suggestions, i think its time i find a new tuner.

if this does not fix it, then i am at a lost and don't know what to do.

Perhaps the solenoid is stuck open a little? Try blowing through it. I seem to remember you need to swap ports on the solenoid too, to normally open.

I run a 1 bar spring using both wastegate ports, and run 30psi in the midrange but it still drops to 25psi by the top.

dont think this would be the case Simon, Blake (BSA) had the same manifold setup (but smaller gate) on his car and it wasn't an issue

what spring are you using in your gate at 1.5 bar ?

1 bar spring with Profec B Spec II doing the rest

Actually its sold lol, collected money for it yesterday.

Im confident theres nothing wrong with the disco itself but its a bad match to the high comp motor and the cams are also shit.

I did say you would make the 250-260 mark mate. A nice result, but like weve been discussing theres possibly more in it with another exhaust housing, probably not worth the hassle tho.

How responsive is it on the street?

i haven't really gave it much yet due to the shit rain but on the dyno its coming on boost 200rpm sooner than before

which was 4200rpm 19psi before now 4000rpm 20psi

not sure if its the eflex or cause i preloaded this turbo more where as the old td05 i had barely any preload on the actuator arm when i removed it

ive had 2 of these kandos now and both performed faultlessly and had no problems

first one i had on for 6 months on pump daily driven 1 track day and a few runs down the quarter and when i removed it was still like new these turbos are bang for buck and perform and good quality

Edited by hy_rpm

ok long story short , i bought another car to use as a track basher , it's a stock 32 pretty much , the turbo is touching the housing so it needs replacing . Digging through my shed i found a couple td05 trust turbo's i had bought a few months ago (td05h 16c in memory , off a gtr ) . Im wondering if this would be worth the effort of fitting up if I'm only aiming for 200rwk , it will be with a kando rear housing and cheap ebay external gate (and the usual mods obviously ) or should i just do the usual and whack a 25 turbo on?

ok long story short , i bought another car to use as a track basher , it's a stock 32 pretty much , the turbo is touching the housing so it needs replacing . Digging through my shed i found a couple td05 trust turbo's i had bought a few months ago (td05h 16c in memory , off a gtr ) . Im wondering if this would be worth the effort of fitting up if I'm only aiming for 200rwk , it will be with a kando rear housing and cheap ebay external gate (and the usual mods obviously ) or should i just do the usual and whack a 25 turbo on?

I would do it every day of the week. And when you get bored of the 16g just whack on a kando CHRA.

Heres a shopping list for you champ:

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Turbine-Housing-Kinugawa-TD05H-T517Z-T518Z-T3-8cm-AR61-V-Band-External-Gated-/290677531859?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item43adbb24d3

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/TURBOSMART-ULTRA-GATE-38MM-BLUE-EXTERNAL-WASTEGATE-VL-/130653329019?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item1e6b8b967b

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/391632-steam-pipe-single-turbo-manifolds-on-fleabayanyone-know-anythging-about-this-supplier-and-their-products/

unique automotive

MVRspc.png

i need a 0.5 or 0.6bar spring to test

after a bit of searching, i dont think the MVR springs work in the older WG44 gate, :\

Dori what springs you using, I think you may have it muddled up

here is the chart I have for my springs...

tial-1.png

im running 3 springs in total,one .4bar and two .3bar springs gives me 1bar total

there is no .5 or .6 bar springs on the MVR only on the MVS

I dont think the blue spring is .6bar..that is the pressure of the green/blue combined...

not sure, but now im confuzzled too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...