Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

heres my entry form, just qualifies :laugh:

tune300.jpg

RED..pulp @ 15psi (E85 @ 15psi made 288kw)

BLUE...17.5 psi on E85

GREEN..21.5 psi on E85

As you can see the extra psi stopped making enough difference to be worthwhile. 18psi is about where I wanted to be anyway so its worked out good..

The torque increase through the midrange on E85 is brilliant, makes it so much more driveable in regular traffic situations..and after 20min or so driving around I opened the bonnet to find a very cool motor..

Anyway its no T67 but it is very nice and responsive to drive, with more than enough power to get me into trouble..

Should keep me satisfied for a while.. :) good diff and tyres on the want list now..

What turbo is that

heres my entry form, just qualifies :laugh:

RED..pulp @ 15psi (E85 @ 15psi made 288kw)

BLUE...17.5 psi on E85

GREEN..21.5 psi on E85

As you can see the extra psi stopped making enough difference to be worthwhile. 18psi is about where I wanted to be anyway so its worked out good..

The torque increase through the midrange on E85 is brilliant, makes it so much more driveable in regular traffic situations..and after 20min or so driving around I opened the bonnet to find a very cool motor..

Anyway its no T67 but it is very nice and responsive to drive, with more than enough power to get me into trouble..

Should keep me satisfied for a while.. :) good diff and tyres on the want list now..

What turbo is that? looks almost identical to my graph.

post-50426-0-73095900-1339503692_thumb.jpg

Realistically it doesnt matter if u get the 3" or the 2.4"...... But if u go the 2.4" ull be able to use the stock intake pipe for teh epic stealth ;) just need to make a heatshield to cover the gate.

If I had an RB20 powered car I would probably do the exact setup we are talking about. Stock manifolds, TD05H 18G with a gate off the housing. Stealthed up and stock position. Like I said 230-240kw and it would be pretty responsive/solid. Ive recently done a TD05H 18G SR20DE and that is a weapon. Faster than a 260rwkw 3076R SR20DET (both S13s).

can u fit the td05 in the stock turbo position?

and ive got one of those china split dump screamers (havnt used it yet) could i just run an internal gate td05 with this so i dont even need a wastegate?

well I dropped mine off for tuning today. Bit of let down really but nothing super bad. Turns out my AFM is too close to the turbo and is causing it to be a pain the ass. The real issue was that it was spiking uncontrollably. ASG told me to change how the waste gate merges with the collector on the manifold. Does any 1 have any input on how it should be changed. The manifold is 1 of the NZ steel 1's from the other thread. and the gate is a Compgate 40.

Chris

I'm running stock cam gears still and stock airbox..that could be worth couple hundred rpm lag..either way it is what is and should keep me content for a while..If I get bored a simple 25g + manifold conversion could net me 100kw extra.But for now, she'll be right..

LOL, for what its worth i run a dirty old HKS filter in my engine bay with no shielding just a duct to it :whistling: I am going back to std airbox so I hope it isnt going to hurt power

Yeh, I am betting its the length of pipe before the manifold. Some people have problems with the 6boost having boost creep when they plumb the gate down near the steering rack rather than high up near the collector. Thats the reason I got rid of my Trust Type R gate as it was too large to package near the collector.

gallery_462_50_238480.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...