Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

dsc05822q.jpg

This is the kinda core I'm using lads. I get where your coming from Scott. I guess I need to decide whether I want the car to look stock and have average power, or put in a conventional cooler kit and gain the missing power I should have, if thats the problem.

well thats a recipe for fail right there..get a proper blitz return flow or something..even a Justjap one would be better than that junk..

I tried to put my T67 10cm housing on my 20G over the weekend and guess what...it didnt fit. Its too small and hits the turbine. So tried the 10cm housing off the TD06H-25G I had and it swims. So it seems Trust run a different turbine again on their twin GTR setups as my20g is one of the pair off a friends R32 GTR

Seems its somewhere between the L2and H. And I have seeb back to back TD06H-25G vs T67-25G and the T67 made 15-20rwkws less..all in the turbine it seems...was a rad laggier by 100-200rpm

well thats a recipe for fail right there..get a proper blitz return flow or something..even a Justjap one would be better than that junk..

The reason why I went with that type is because I'd smack the shit out of the bottom pipe due to the cars height. I'll probably go conventional setup. Could an intercooler restrict the amount of boost a turbo can make, or limit power at a certian point?

Roy I'm sure you are aware but:

TD06SL2 = 61mm

TD06S = 65mm

TD06SH = 67mm

So its no surprise your regular TD06S doesn't fit the T67 housing but is too small for the TD06SH........... Its meant to be.

Unless I am missing something the above is your answer.

In terms of flow the TD06SH > TD06SL2 > TD06S.

I hope that helps..

The reason why I went with that type is because I'd smack the shit out of the bottom pipe due to the cars height. I'll probably go conventional setup. Could an intercooler restrict the amount of boost a turbo can make, or limit power at a certian point?

its not limiting the amount of boost it can make, its limiting the amount of boost that you can effectively reach because the knock threshold turns to shit.

that intercooler would be by far the worst possible option you can have.

IMHO it would hold back power to a point close to the stock side mount and would also harm spool.

CHANGE IT AND THEN KILL IT WITH FIRE.

Got a mate with a normal return flow intercooler kit, I'll swap with him for a few days and see if anything happens eh (and see if I could actually run such a setup at my height).


Cheers for the advice guys :D

Edited by Run-It-Hard

If you have a read of the hypergear thread the above shown return flow is good for about 250kw until it encounters the same issue.

I think 1 or 2 members have achieved more with top notch jap branded kits... but that are more or less one off cases.


Go the conventional route and ditch the headache and question out of your mind!

Roy I'm sure you are aware but:

TD06SL2 = 61mm

TD06S = 65mm

TD06SH = 67mm

So its no surprise your regular TD06S doesn't fit the T67 housing but is too small for the TD06SH........... Its meant to be.

Unless I am missing something the above is your answer.

In terms of flow the TD06SH > TD06SL2 > TD06S.

I hope that helps..

But strange thing is that this turbine doesnt match any of those. The T67 that I swapped housings with was the twin T67s that repalced the twin 20Gs on the same car and I wonder whether the turbines are specific to twin GTR setups!?!?!

On the same dyno my car has if anything made the same power but with better reponse than the several L2s that have been tuned. I had bought an L2 based on what everyone had posted but after a few more RB20-20Gs rolled through my tuners workshop and we had compared results....well I sold my L2 to Kris for his drift car. So I wasnt convinced it flowed any better. Perhaps if an L2 fella ran E85 and we could see if they flowed better at 24psi and 300+rwkws

That's very odd. It may be something like a TC turbine or similar.

Can you get me the Inducer and Exducer measurements, along with a blade count? I will have a look and see what it marry's up against.

From what I have found online a TC06 will be 12 blade and 64mm. Smaller than a normal TD06.

That info may not be accurate though..

The TC06 turbine blades have an obvious cup shape to them.. Its not what were used to seeing in terms of turbine aero. Very 80s.

Kando have had a few oddball (unexpected) units on offer, including the Hino (truck) spec GT3576 (plain bearing, split pulse IW turbine). Not surprised to see that GT3071.

Likewise the TD06 hybrid with TO4R compressor, it's been around as have other hybrids with the old-school 60-1 compressor. Maybe not the most efficient stuff but they can work reasonably well at the price.

Re the TD07 unit, I think the main thing that will differentiate them from the TDO6 based units is the size of the centre section, bigger diameter shaft, and no water cooling option. Take a cue from the T67-25G.

Hey Dale, I already have a TD06sh-25G so I was thinking if it don't make enough power I might convert it to a TD07S-25G. I finally pulled my finger out and decided to fix my wastegate now that I don't melt when I walk into my shed . Seems all the info I find is where people have them on rotary's.

Yeah td07s 25g with 16cm rear seems the turbo for a rotary, but i dont think kando do that rear do they?

Also they are offering a t04 compressor housing and wheel kit, just curious if anyone has tried to fit this to a stock nissan turbo? I'm seriously considring buying this kit, having the shaft balenced then seeing whats possible.

Any suggestions stao?

, but

I already have a TD06sh-25G so I was thinking if it don't make enough power I might convert it to a TD07S-25G. Seems all the info I find is where people have them on rotary's.

The TD06SH + 12cm should offer a fair bit more turbine flow than the SL2 + 10cm found on the T67 25G. I think that the SH will be enough to handle all the flow a 25G can throw at it so maybe pointless going for bigger turbine unless you're looking at capacity bigger than 3 litre. I can't find hard evidence on the TDO7 specs but it seems likely to offer nothing other than a 0.5mm bigger shaft.

I'd say run the SH and see how it performs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...