Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Point is it is a downgrade from the stock ecu and there is no good reason to buy or use one.

you can get them to work fine with air-con, i had one on my WRX in 1999 with a Gt30 etc , before they did flash tunes, I had one on my r31 with air-con, both drove like stock actually

a good tuner can get a decent result from them

cheers

darren

you can get them to work fine with air-con, i had one on my WRX in 1999 with a Gt30 etc , before they did flash tunes, I had one on my r31 with air-con, both drove like stock actually

a good tuner can get a decent result from them

cheers

darren

exactly mine is fine cold starts sits at 1200rpm warms up and drops down to 880rpm everytime no problem. drives like normal starts fine works fine with my VCT and i dont have to worry about upgrading afm as it does not use one. do you really think all the vl guys and a hell of alot of drag cars use them because they are no good. yes they may not be as good as a PFC and has no where near the amount of features the PFC has but im happy it does the job fine and i got it pretty cheap off a mate who took it off his VLT before he sold it and bought a skyline. maybe one day ill remove it and get something better but until then im happy with it and lets drop the hatred towards the microtechs.

Ah well... To be honest I think most microtech users would be like us. Happy with what the machine does as the end user can hardly tell the difference.

Sort of like a 80 year old that gets an iphone on their grand childs recommendation... The chances the 80 year old will do much beyond answering it when it rings and try to make a call on the odd occasion will be slim. No offence but this would fit the bill for over 80 percent of users on this forum when put into context, it fits my bill and I dont even consider myself an entry level user.

Moving on, this is the Kando thread not the Microtech thread. Back to Kando!

LOL @ microleb!!!!!!!!!

i said it a few pages back but here it is again,

ideal setup for a RB25 would be TD06SL2-20g (10cm) with stock manifold (either weld 40 or 44mm ext gate to manifold or onto rear housing)and it will be kept low mount and sorta stock-ish looking, no need to fork out $1000+ for a top mount manifold.

can either run screamer to atmo or plumb back to the dump/front pipe.

this setup would be the most cost effective and stock-ish looking for at least 280rwkw+

i will be changing to this setup next year at tax time. hopefully my twin turbos will last until then but at the rate its going, i think the turbo seals are going again (only replaced the turbos with 2nd hand units 2 months ago as well :( unless i find decently priced HKS GT-SS or -7/-9s for under $1600 but at this stage, the kando setup is looking very favourable).

This is real confusing I'm looking at the td06l2-20g for my rb25 however stao has been trying to sell me one of his turbos I think by saying that the td06l2 is not a big power maker and nit very responsive I know if your looking for a straight turbo swap for streeter HG is the way to go. Do you think this is true or is stao just trying to sell me one of his units

Well for a kando turbo you need to customise some piping for an external wastegate. Whereas the Hypergear turbo will bolt straight in as its internally gated.

Then you just need to compare the turbo results, this will vary on which turbo of each variety you choose. I have not seen many td06l2-20g results on rb25s so that might be hard. Whereas there are tonnes of Hypergear results to look at.

Obviously Tao is trying to sell you a turbo hes not a charity but I think for sub 300rwkw with the standard manifold, bang for buck is pretty bloody hard to beat.

This is real confusing I'm looking at the td06l2-20g for my rb25 however stao has been trying to sell me one of his turbos I think by saying that the td06l2 is not a big power maker and nit very responsive I know if your looking for a straight turbo swap for streeter HG is the way to go. Do you think this is true or is stao just trying to sell me one of his units

Let me set something straight...... As much as I respect Stao and his products, saying the TD06SL2 is not a good power maker is total GARBAGE.

For the 11ty billionth time THE T67 AND TD06SL2 ARE THE SAME TURBINE WHEEL....... Meaning Simons 10cm T67 turbine and housing is the exact same turbine and housing you will get on a TD06SL2 10cm.

The difference between the T67 and TD06SL2 is the shaft diameter. The T67 is a TD07 and the TD06SL2 is a.......... TD06! Dont be confused, TRUST used the TD07 shaft with the 'TD06SL2' wheel so they could mate it to a 25G compressor, because the 25G is a TD07 sized compressor.

As for response, a little SR20 will get an SL2 20g on full song before 4000rpm and top out around 300kw. Trent (STATUS) has even shown an SR spooling a 10cm TD06SL2 20g as good as a GT2871R (HKS GTRS).

Ive said it before and I will say it again, if Simon can make something close to the 400kw zone out of the SL2 turbine and 10cm housing, I highly doubt the little 20g compressor will have any heat or restriction problems pumping through the same turbine and housing. The Hypergear stuff is good, but it gets hot. For my daily driver and occasional drag machine I would definitely get a HG. For my weekend warrior and track weapon (I mean part time track) I would get the Kando every time.

Just match it to the Tial 44mm gate and your laughing.

stop confusing people with your knowledge Scott :P

For the 11ty billionth time THE T67 AND TD06SL2 ARE THE SAME TURBINE WHEEL....... Meaning Simons 10cm T67 turbine and housing is the exact same turbine and housing you will get on a TD06SL2 10cm.

this..

+

SL2 has a smaller compressor making it a better fit when low mounting..in theory it should also make it more responsive...

Is all you really to know ;)

theres a few youtube videos of a ceffie in thailand or singapore or something with a RB25 running a TD06 20G i believe.

seems to go pretty good and very responsive but no dyno sheets.

obviously in japan there will be more results but not much in the case of dyno sheets etc.

I've asked Trent on numerous occasions to post up some results of the TD06 on a RB25 but looks like he may of missed those posts in this thread.

didn't Dr-Drift run a TD06-20G on his R32 RB25 and it made over 300rwkw or so.

Perhaps there is a sheet of it floating around somewhere on the net.

found it;

TD06-20GL2 Chinese Copy (modified exhaust housing with T3 Flange)

XSPower High Mount T3 Ext Gate S/S Manifold

50mm Chinese External Gate

50mm S/S Screamer Pipe

4" Intake with 4" Pod Filter

Bosch/Nissan Z32 Air Flow Meter

Ok, so took the taxi out to calder for the drags... car has been retune to the tune of 305 rwkw!

Best ET was 12.0 @ 122 mph with a 2.6 60' and sever lack of traction!

flyby video;

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=WpLIZwDGY4I

turbo;

post-179-1224594133.jpg

dyno;

261rwkw @ 16psi & 305rwkw @ 20psi charts;

dcrew1.jpg

I wouldnt go off those results, they dont seem to be doing their thing...

Roy has proved the 20g to be the goods too. It gets up and boogies the way we would like it to and all on a little RB20.

FYI there are more abundant 1JZ 20g results.

LOL Shutup Dave, hurry up and get your 20g on, dont make me come down there and repair mustang sally with a sledge hammer and some beer. Do as I say. DO AS I SSSSSAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

odd that it had such big boost drop though.. Gate too big maybe?

Or just too chinese...

eD..mustang sally is up and running man, just needs a new windscreen..

Im waiting on scott to weld the housing and hes waiting on me to buy a gate..:D

odd that it had such big boost drop though.. Gate too big maybe?

Or just too chinese...

eD..mustang sally is up and running man, just needs a new windscreen..

Im waiting on scott to weld the housing and hes waiting on me to buy a gate..:D

Nah it doesnt seem too bad, but gate selection could probably compensate for it as you said.

The problem is more likely to be its running an 8cm housing, the 10cm housing was some sort of mythical creature before Kando came along and I highly doubt his copy was a 10cm job. I rekon theres a chance the 8cm might bring the 20g on so early it climaxes before the motor comes into its natural powerband that it just hinders the whole final output like that.

Scott, can you put up some dyno results with the 20g on a 1jz :)

Just youtube 1JZ 20G mate, there are a lot out of japland. As you know Japan doesnt have the forum base we do for tuning.

found it;

TD06-20GL2 Chinese Copy (modified exhaust housing with T3 Flange)

XSPower High Mount T3 Ext Gate S/S Manifold

50mm Chinese External Gate

50mm S/S Screamer Pipe

4" Intake with 4" Pod Filter

Bosch/Nissan Z32 Air Flow Meter

turbo;

post-179-1224594133.jpg

dyno;

261rwkw @ 16psi & 305rwkw @ 20psi charts;

dcrew1.jpg

Isnt that graph in hp?

Based on my experience of my car on his dyno makes a lot more sense then the claim of 305rwkws.

The below is my car on an old 235rwkws Racepace tune that equaled about 244rwkws on his dyno. Not long after this I went back to Racepace and we leaned on the tune a little more with 100ron and made a comfortable 260rwkws (track tune) So Based on finding 25rwkws on the Racepace dyno lets call it 245+25rwkws on Dr Drifts dyno....so about 270rwkws

gallery_462_50_8431.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...