Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

took car to nissan service to sort out the ECL issue

if u guys remember, the codes that came out were 1110, 1111 and 1135

turned out there was an opened circuit at the intake camshaft on the passenger side, so after an hour's work to fix the wiring and $121 paid to nissan service, no more ECL coming up...happycheers.gif

the guy at nissan service asked me how i found out the codes without OBD2 scanner, i told him i talked to the ECU and it answered me lolwhistling.gif

lol just a short drive to the city this morning and i used a lot of fuel

nah its the same as a t30 xtrail - 22680-6N21A

thats for the hotwire only, not the whole tube - which isnt required anyway

Found a couple of links;

http://www.nissanpar...2680-6n211.html

http://www.cyberspac...n-uk/p1178.html

Slightly Cheaper price.

Edited by Daleo

Link doesn't seem to work?

Dunno what happened to that one, Google the updated part number (can't remember it, posting from phone) and it'll come up. Price was $190 aus.

Dunno what happened to that one, Google the updated part number (can't remember it, posting from phone) and it'll come up. Price was $190 aus.

Try this one :)

http://www.cyberspaceautoparts.com.au/contents/en-uk/p1178.html

took car to nissan service to sort out the ECL issue

if u guys remember, the codes that came out were 1110, 1111 and 1135

turned out there was an opened circuit at the intake camshaft on the passenger side, so after an hour's work to fix the wiring and $121 paid to nissan service, no more ECL coming up...happycheers.gif

the guy at nissan service asked me how i found out the codes without OBD2 scanner, i told him i talked to the ECU and it answered me lolwhistling.gif

Which Nissan dealer Syd?

it's the camberwell one cam, they were quite nice although they admitted my M35 was the 1st one they ever seen and with some luck they saw another one drove past on the same day lol

it's the camberwell one cam, they were quite nice although they admitted my M35 was the 1st one they ever seen and with some luck they saw another one drove past on the same day lol

Cool, sounds like a reasonable dealership (Yes, the shock is overwhelming!!)

Went to Jb Hifi yesterday before work and was looking at getting a new cd player for my car but wanted to keep the HDTV i got in my car atm. So the guy there said i can keep my oem cd player in my rx and just get a FM extender to get all the fm stations in australia. Well this cost me $25 from autobarn so i was strapped. That was until i took my dash apart and seen that our aerial plugs are twin pin units and the fm extender is a single. So today i ordered the adapter from the UK for it. Cost me $75.00 AUD so all in all im still happy i get to keep the OEM unit. Just got to wait a little longer until the adapter arrives.

http://www.nexxia.co...ategory=Antenna Adaptors&section=Car Audio

Went to Jb Hifi yesterday before work and was looking at getting a new cd player for my car but wanted to keep the HDTV i got in my car atm. So the guy there said i can keep my oem cd player in my rx and just get a FM extender to get all the fm stations in australia. Well this cost me $25 from autobarn so i was strapped. That was until i took my dash apart and seen that our aerial plugs are twin pin units and the fm extender is a single. So today i ordered the adapter from the UK for it. Cost me $75.00 AUD so all in all im still happy i get to keep the OEM unit. Just got to wait a little longer until the adapter arrives.

http://www.nexxia.co...ategory=Antenna Adaptors&section=Car Audio

I got my aerial adapter at auto barn for $10

Got the Cat back on, can actually hear the exhuast note over the induction sound. Gained a few ponies and must have lost 30kg's getting rid of that huge coffin mid muffler.

Front pipe is on next to go on when it arrives.

imgp7290q.jpg

imgp7288j.jpg

imgp7289o.jpg

Edited by Ross

Fitted the new suction pipe toady with the help (should read totally lost without) Craig (aka Jetwreck, is there any thin on cars this man can not do).

This was certainly at the limit of my ability and patience to work on cars.

Thanks to Scott for hit great fabrication, only a slight mod of cutting a grove into the bottom bracket of the suction pipe so it could be placed over the shaft of the bolt.

For anyone looking to do this mod make sure you work with someone who is a contortionist as there is no bloody room to work in.

Net result is a good fit with a little bit of tidying up to be done on pipe work but the car feels even better down low in the rev range. Not had a chance to really test the top end as I am conscious that I need to finalise things under the bonnet and aware that I am currently running 17psi and want to be careful of hitting fuel cut.

thanks all.

Cheers

Andy

Had my mate in give the wagon a good cut and polish and wax job while I'm in renmark for the weekend. Looks very

Nice now. Just need to wash it again when I get

Home and give it another wax to finish it off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...