Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

landed is different to landed and complied!

....5K on and NM35 is going to go a shit load faster and have greater economy than on a PNM true or false?

There will soon be a heavily modified NM35 from Mercury Motorsport smashing PNM35's like glass bottles against a wall!!!......mind you it would matter if you put that driveline in the NM or PM because other than the dash it would still be the same car.

BAM!!!!

lol @ your example and "BAM!"

Tell me which engine they stroked to make 4.15L...

Also, I meant landed and complied. Surely you read those Prestige emails, yes? They are the same ones I get ;)

Edited by iamhe77

That thing is huge!

4.2 stroker, GT62, hnnnnnnngggghhhhh! :woot:

It's come a long way since I saw it. Was buried so deep amongst other 'project' cars that I didn't think it'd see the light of day.

The Mercury car is a VQ35.

Only NM35 owners get their panties in a twist when Series 2 cars are mentioned. Nissan removed all the unreliable sucky bits like the attesa pump and the turbo...

Pulled apart and clean/decreased my r32 gtr front calipers getting ready for paint. A light sand on thursday and they will be ready for some black paint . Gunna keep the nissan badge on them silver as my car is silver. Was going to go with the red nissan wording but happy with the standard silver.

The Mercury car is a VQ35.

Only NM35 owners get their panties in a twist when Series 2 cars are mentioned. Nissan removed all the unreliable sucky bits like the attesa pump and the turbo...

Series 2......... f**kING f**k f**k f**kERS! (yes i own a NM35).There should be more of this between us :3some:

Edited by gleeson

lol @ your example and "BAM!"

Tell me which engine they stroked to make 4.15L...

Also, I meant landed and complied. Surely you read those Prestige emails, yes? They are the same ones I get ;)

They used a vq35 and threw mega dollars at it because its a piss week motor. If they had brains they would have stuck a r35 motor or a Chev in it.

Yes I read the prestige emails....but I skip all the NA crap!

Loving you and Alex justifying the vq35. I agree it's a good motor but man there like broken bottles in a pub if the money's not spent. I mean what did Alex get....220rwkw's out of his with a 30/86...max on 98. From memory where is Scott at with his vq25 and the same turbo....even my pos capped it with a shit turbo setup. That should tell you straight away that Nissan went full ret ard taking the z33, v35 and pnm to the vq35de.

Off topic is off topic!!

The Mercury car is a VQ35.

Only NM35 owners get their panties in a twist when Series 2 cars are mentioned. Nissan removed all the unreliable sucky bits like the attesa pump and the turbo...

And power!!!

  • Like 1

I was actually looking at a different conversion from the norm for my vl a while back, and was thinking about the 4 litre out of the Navara then use the m32 manifolds etc to turbo it! (hopeing nissan kept everything interchangable like they do) that would make a very very nice torque engine

  • Like 1

Bought this too fix my turbo flutter issue...................................... tsutsutsutsu :verymad:

post-86502-0-63611700-1375362038_thumb.jpg

*Insert face palm smiley*

Aside from annoying (once the novelty wears off) is this sort of flutter potentially damaging for the turbo?

Last night after many hours of F n around managed to get the oil filter off, I don't know how hard the rb25 is but the rb26 is just rediculous, removed the batter and then the fuse box (pushed that forward to where the battery was) after getting that off I was happy to then attempt to change the oil. Also did the gear box oil (maybe had 2.5 litres in it) car shifts alot nicer now. now to do diffs and transfer case next.

Last night after many hours of F n around managed to get the oil filter off, I don't know how hard the rb25 is but the rb26 is just rediculous, removed the batter and then the fuse box (pushed that forward to where the battery was) after getting that off I was happy to then attempt to change the oil. Also did the gear box oil (maybe had 2.5 litres in it) car shifts alot nicer now. now to do diffs and transfer case next.

Lol I had the same problem when I first got mine.their is an easy way to do it but its tight,all you need is the correct tools and to just undo the fuse box so it moves slightly and you can do it ill post up a photo of the tools tonight when I get home (if I remember)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah and hence my ghetto way of slamming the brakes, get the ABS to cycle, rebleed seems to be a sensible workaround.
    • Hey! Happy to help. Nothing inherently wrong with the adapter, it's more so with Brett Collins himself. He gave me a lot of incorrect information when I was in contact with him and was extremely rude when I challenged him. He stated I could not use any aftermarket twin plate clutches except for his own, not to use the dush shield, bla bla bla and it was all BS.  Collins stated to cut roughly 14mm's off the housing, I took off 15mm to make room for the dust shield. I would confirm with whatever adapter manufacturer you're using. 
    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
×
×
  • Create New...