Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I use a Magnafuel washable filter. Methanol/Ethanon compatible.

I tested the local Caltex last week and can confirm they are still supplying E75. Hence im sticking with the United stuff (E90).

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How easy is it to retune for a massive change eg E70 to E90, can you just do a rough across the board adjustment and accept it will be good enough, or does it really need to go on the dyno?

How easy is it to retune for a massive change eg E70 to E90, can you just do a rough across the board adjustment and accept it will be good enough, or does it really need to go on the dyno?

I didn't find the change that severe although I only changed from the Southland Manildra e85, 1 afr on the wideband richer. I guess you could fiddle with injector size if you have a wideband, just run it a little rich just in case.

I did find extra power though when I tuned for Eflex, just wondering if the ethanol needs a little petrol kick to get it firing quicker in the chamber. As Trent has said, its like C16 straight from the pump, at $1L.

  • 1 month later...

I recently got my car tuned by Gavin Wood

RB25 with GT3076 0.82 external 50mm gate.

Gav said he couldn't get more than 250kw at 1.1bar out of it safely. When I asked why, he said it's probably just because it's an older worn engine with alot of carbon buildup.

If I was to grab some big injectors and swap to E85, would that overcome this problem to a certain extent, and allow me to run more boost/timing to get more power out of the car, or would that just be asking for trouble?

Thanks guys!

I recently got my car tuned by Gavin Wood

RB25 with GT3076 0.82 external 50mm gate.

Gav said he couldn't get more than 250kw at 1.1bar out of it safely. When I asked why, he said it's probably just because it's an older worn engine with alot of carbon buildup.

If I was to grab some big injectors and swap to E85, would that overcome this problem to a certain extent, and allow me to run more boost/timing to get more power out of the car, or would that just be asking for trouble?

Thanks guys!

It would only be asking for trouble if you upped the boost a heap, just filling with e85 and remapping the fuel would make the tune much safer as there is no chance of detonation, and the 30% extra fuel volume will cool the pistons more. I don't see a down side at all other than finding a local servo. Dual map it though if you can, just as a backup.

Gav said he couldn't get more than 250kw at 1.1bar out of it safely. When I asked why, he said it's probably just because it's an older worn engine with alot of carbon buildup.

How old is old?? Mine is almost 200,000km and at 1.2bar it goes quite chirpily :)

1993 GTST... No idea what real K's are but i'm guessing they are probably around that... I think he said adding more timing didn't seem to make a difference so there was no point?

What sorta power are you getting at 1.2bar?

POST FAIL.... Sorry guys, copy and paste went wrong!!!!!!!!!!!

Edited by 34GeeTeeTee

250rwkw is not too far off for 1.1 bar...

from memory I had ~250 @ 1 bar with the 2835... but i never EVER ran 1 bar

shove 1.3 bar into it and you should see a substantial gain.

did gav try to add more boost, or just more timing @ 1.1 bar?

250rwkw is not too far off for 1.1 bar...

from memory I had ~250 @ 1 bar with the 2835... but i never EVER ran 1 bar

shove 1.3 bar into it and you should see a substantial gain.

did gav try to add more boost, or just more timing @ 1.1 bar?

Listen to this man!

God damnit I want to get tuned for E85 now!!!! I'm running a pissy 17psi (dropping to 16) on 98 :( I'd love to up it to 19psi on e85....stop bumping these damned threads! you're giving me bad ideas

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...