Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have an rb26 with 555 injectors garrett -5 turbos, autronic computer and aurtronic cdi 15psi.

will i get any gain on e85 or is it not worth it.

dont have time to get the tune changed.

i have an rb26 with 555 injectors garrett -5 turbos, autronic computer and aurtronic cdi 15psi.

will i get any gain on e85 or is it not worth it.

dont have time to get the tune changed.

Needs to be tuned and likely bigger injectors, as a short answer. It will also require a couple of new fuel filters replaced periodically as the crap is cleaned out of the tank + fuel lines.

Injectors are far too small for -5s on PULP as it is...

On E85 - forget it, not a hope in hell you'll get enough out of them.

Also 1bar on -5s is kinda pointless. You need 20-24psi to really get things into the happy zone.

No way in hell man. U are expecting e85 to run on the same tune as 98.

E85 requires atleast 30% more fuel injected into the engine than 98 so putting it in without tuning will lean ur motor out and more than likely blow in up

Well I'm making 402 rwkw using ID 2000's ( which are actually 2250cc) at 52% duty cycle. Calculate that back it's roughly 1170cc I'm using.... Soooo not very much if that's anything to go by

so how would sard 1000s go on e85 with twin bosch 044s surge tank and another 044 in tank on a built 26?

currently 427kw @ all 4 with a t88 on 98pulp

N1GTR maxed his 1000's at 403kws on E85 but thats on a 3L, you might be able to maintain the current level of power on a 2.6L but would be the very limit...you would get no gains and 30% more fuel usage

so how would sard 1000s go on e85 with twin bosch 044s surge tank and another 044 in tank on a built 26?

currently 427kw @ all 4 with a t88 on 98pulp

I dont think you would make your current power. A set of ID 1600's would be spot on.

It will also require a couple of new fuel filters replaced periodically as the crap is cleaned out of the tank + fuel lines.

bit of a myth IMO - my fuel filters were fine, replaced twice during the approx 18months i was on E85, even cut one open to have a look - that's 100% E85 as well, no map changes back to 98 here and there

N1GTR maxed his 1000's at 403kws on E85 but thats on a 3L, you might be able to maintain the current level of power on a 2.6L but would be the very limit...you would get no gains and 30% more fuel usage

I've spoken to a few people with 3L RB's and they've had much bigger gains on E85 due to the higher compression of the 3L. One bloke was telling me how the 26 doesnt have as high compression as the SR's or the RB30. so therefore the 26 can't take as much advantage of the knock resistance of the fuel.

I've had minimal top end gains in my GTR going to E85, only really made gains in the midrange. but i did get it tuned on a hot day and it still made good power. the STD intercooler is probably holding me back.

Am getting it tuned this Thursday, hopefully it will be a little cooler and get some better figures. the tuner tuned it on the richer side just in case it leaned out too much in colder weather.

So hopefully with a cooler day and leaner AFR's i can get a little more out of the car?

bit of a myth IMO - my fuel filters were fine, replaced twice during the approx 18months i was on E85, even cut one open to have a look - that's 100% E85 as well, no map changes back to 98 here and there

Have been running E85 for just under a month and going back to get the fuel filter changed. the mechanic said that my tank looked to be pretty clean when installing the twin pumps intank. so i dont think that the fuel filter would be too dirty. i might just change the fuel filter this time and if its still pretty clean i will just do it after another 6 months or so.

I've noticed that on E85 my oil has been looking much cleaner?

has anyone else experienced this?

on PULP the oil used to start to look darker, but on E85 is still looks fairly fresh.

bit of a myth IMO - my fuel filters were fine, replaced twice during the approx 18months i was on E85, even cut one open to have a look - that's 100% E85 as well, no map changes back to 98 here and there

I suppose you could be right and upon thinking about it maybe even the initial change of the fuel filter when first going to E85 might not be needed. Ethanol as we know is a solvent and could breakdown stuff already trapped in the fuel filter but even then if it is getting past the fuel filter why worry as it must be alright to go through the injectors, etc.

In theory anyway.

i'd almost be resigned to put that one into the 'corrodes fuel lines' bin...

maybe it's just completely dependent on the car? my GTT NEVER gave me any engine issues other than the normal coilpack issue, so maybe if you just have a healthy engine that's seen good oil, fuel and regular maintenance, it's not an issue.

i know i'm not the only one to not have had issues with fuel filters.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...