Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey all, i was wondering if anyone has done a m35 stagea sump on a vq30 or 35 4wd in a r32gtr? i was doing some head porting today on a vq30 head and man are they a much better design than the old rb!! the exhaust would evan rival the intake of a rb...

would be a pretty cool conversion, light weight vvt big power potential and 4wd. yes would use a bell housing adapter.. and custom front shaft.. would be a challenge but im sure its possible.

any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/355860-vq35hr-conversion/
Share on other sites

It would have great potential, VQ35 parts are very cheap in the US, you can build the internals to handle 800 to 1500hp fairly easily.

I would just get a stock VQ25det or the second option, VQ30det. Either "should" handle 400kw unopened as they run the same rods.

The 4wd sump off the VQ25 fits onto the VQ35, all the exhaust ports are the same so the VQ25det manifold fits on the 35, esentially they are all the same blocks just bored out more for the larger sleeves.

I was going to run a built VQ35 block with all the 25det parts on it. (so the ecu wont care.) I may not have to if the 25 handles the torque when the new GTX3071 goes in, on ethanol. My next goal is 350awkw on an unopened engine.

If you end up making a bellhousing adapter or similar myself and many others would buy one as the auto isn't strong enough for that sort of power, no mater what I do to it.

I am assuming there is not a manual nm35 available? Doing the conversion would be much easier if you had an awd gearbox to use off the bat.

Bellhousings on Nissans are not quite as fun as Toyota, I wouldn't want yo be making a custom one for it. An adaptor plate could work but the room for error just shits me... Along with the thought of having the input shaft not reaching the spiggot...

This thread makes me feel bored of my JZR33 already :P should have done something harder lol

Haha, the challenge is certainly there with mine. It is an easy conversion to manual if you want rear drive, just get a 350z 6 speed. If you want the awd, the only box suitable would be the 34 gtr getrag as the bellhousing detaches, cut and weld the VQ one on the front of it. (until someone makes an aftermarket one :whistling: ) It has been done in Aus already, an awd 350z is getting around with a stagea sump/diff and getrag.

http://www.350z-tech.com/forums/148-australia/66268-awd-conversion.html

He mentions he has the cad drawings for all the parts and was thinking about manufacturing them...

finding a vq25 awd sump seems to be abit hard. they are still quite new. bellhousing adapter/cut and weld. or when i get my hollenger il just order it with a vq bellhousing( apparently been made)

so the vq engines blocks arnt differant like rb blocks?

I have a spare one but it's going under the 3.5 block once it is built. No point doing the build unless the 2.5 goes though, it's my backup plan.

You can possibly get the newer 3.5 awd setup for a similar price but you would have to change the rods for any decent power levels.

point me in the rite direction! i really dont want to buy a halfcut just for a diff... and finding a 3.5awd engine would be abit tricky?? ps. whats the go with single vct and twin vct? early and late? or is it just the 25 thats got twin?

No, the 2.5 has single Vct as does the early 3.5, from 05 i think, they changed to both intake and exhaust.

The g35x in the states has 3.5 awd as does the later m35's. A half cut or a stagea wreck is your best option. I picked up a 3.5 with thrust bearing knock for $500 off eBay.

well after much interweb searching on the differances between awd and rear vq 35's ive decided to go with the vq35hr. much better block and head design, also available in awd.. since the chances of finding a skyline 250gt-4 half cut is next to nothing.. i looked up the sump differances..

all can be had from infinity usa for $100 for the 4wd upper oil pan and $60 for the oil filter housing.. lol so cheap. oh and $1200 for the complete front diff assembly. as it is a bolt on unit not cast in like the rb..

fx35 bits

now ive just got to find a vq35hr engine..k now of and twin throttle wrecked 350z's anywhere?

Only thing I can fault on my VQ is the open deck block design. Can't keep head gaskets in 1 piece. Apart from that, they are an awesome motor.

Gonna give mine one last squeeze before I sell the car, hoping for 600ish HP.

Is the HR closed deck???

Just close it up. Easy fix while you had the heads off.

Your results are why im keen to push 350kw now. Out of interest, any idea how thick the head bolts are? I haven't removed mine yet... Have you considered upgrading them?

post-63525-0-41441400-1299675241_thumb.jpg

awesome idea dave. I love it. would be interesting to see the total cost of a VQ35 conversion vs a big $$ RB30/32/34 build up? plus for anyone who starts with a good condition RB26 they can sell that for an easy $4k+. then it's just a matter of engine, the AWD sump (with suitable diff). make new bellhousing for a getrag 6 speed, or run the 5 speed with a weld on, or run the hollinger like you said with the right bellhousing ordered from hollinger.

800hp VQ35 in a 32 GTR with a hollinger would be a piece of gear!!

now make it happen!

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...