Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2000 cc injectors are way overkill.

Let your tuner decide what it needs. They know what they are doing.

Not sure what Marko needs but I am taking this advice and will see what Jim feels he needs to make it work in together. It seems it might be a bit easier for the injectors to work better on the dyno then under more stress on the road maybe??

I'd also rely on the tuner...which Jim is tuning it and what power level are u aiming for?

From memory I think my tuner only hit 65% duty cycle which was impressive

Edited by Marko R1

CRD, we have only spoken about 400awkw ish on pump, E85 ? having the Haltech Flex Fuel Sensor installed just in case I ever get a chance to use it. To be honest I would not be using the E85 for the extra GO, but it seems a good all round fuel for the engine..

Haha , I do not even know what a duty cycle is, I will go and look it up but I would guess it means they are not pushed to the limit :)

just had a look and my guess was right but terminology was a little rocky :)

Seems that it is not a good idea to exceed 80% to 85% duty cycle and if you are at 100% there is no injector control as it is open 100% of the time

Paul, get back to work :)

The world of modifying cars is certainly much different than I expected, I saw alcohol abusing, cigarette puffing, drug taking, tattooed , mullet cut yobbos and thats why I joined but now I am consorting with a bunch of fairy blokes that use their big head, gotta get out of here :/

Off topic

Does it make it over kill to have injectors at , say 55% cycle. Just thinking that you never know what you will do in the future. Does it cause a problem, rough idle or anything like that ??

Edited by TT350GT

With the old wrecks of injectors (Sards, Rochester, whatever else) that was an issue. Today with the ID/Bosch 14V's for example, it's not really an issue.

Look at that. ID 2000's on a pissy 1.8 NA.

Did they install these to prove a point?

Yes. The point being that there isnt any downside to using the larger ID injectors.

Aftermarket Industries stock a new 1650cc bosch injector that is worth a look too. Direct plug-in connector compatability with the RB26 loom, so no cut/solder job.

http://www.aftermarketindustries.com.au/injectors-c49/bosch-1650-p206/

Well I am sceptical of larger than necessary injectors. Being able to control it is one thing, but what about the fuel mixing thoroughly with the incoming air?

What ecu is used in the video? I'm sure bit all ecu's would be able to control such low opening times.

For sure allow some head room, but be realistic about the flow you really need.

At a stoichiometric idle? Which the video wasn't. ...

Going off my wideband they were fine (which I'm sure Brett is referring to in his post). The old wreck Sard 800's were 10 times more grumpy than the ID2000's are.
  • Like 1

I have the Haltech pro R34GTR platinum ECU, I would think it should do the job if we went that way. Just getting my head around injectors, well the best I can in a day or 2 :) haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...