Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just fitted a V-manage unit with the help of my tuner Cihan, it doesn't seem to be outputting the correct signal to the cam retarders but I can read the stock cam mapping quite well. It seems to be advancing the cams early on, before the stock turbo makes boost which is promising, up to 30 degrees advance from what I logged.

The VQ35de data I am using to control it must have a different signal to run its hydraulic cam retarders, and there doesn't seem to be any other CVCT VQ's listed. Does anyone know of a different VQ that runs the same electromagnetic actuator?

Not looking good for the cable throttle install as the cams will go into full retard once the engine is in limp mode, unless I can get this working.

I have emailed Greddy Japan for support but im not holding my breath...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/361418-m35-v-manage-install/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hmmm maybe its time to save up for a GZONE remap....and a complete retune :whistling:

yup....do it!!!....be a pioneer!

might find some others follow once they know it's good!

Edited by Jetwreck

I just fitted a V-manage unit with the help of my tuner Cihan, it doesn't seem to be outputting the correct signal to the cam retarders but I can read the stock cam mapping quite well. It seems to be advancing the cams early on, before the stock turbo makes boost which is promising, up to 30 degrees advance from what I logged.

The VQ35de data I am using to control it must have a different signal to run its hydraulic cam retarders, and there doesn't seem to be any other CVCT VQ's listed. Does anyone know of a different VQ that runs the same electromagnetic actuator?

Not looking good for the cable throttle install as the cams will go into full retard once the engine is in limp mode, unless I can get this working.

I have emailed Greddy Japan for support but im not holding my breath...

Not 100% certain but as stated last night the VQ23de will probably have it.

Actually.... it references the CVTC only for VQ25det and VQ23de on the VQ section of Wikipedia

Hmm... the VQ23de was used in the Teana in the US, so maybe you should talk to Greddy US instead of Japan.

yup....do it!!!....be a pioneer!

might find some others follow once they know it's good!

I'm actually in the process of doing this at the moment.

After I saw that listing on Import Monster, I spoke to a colleague who knows Japanese, and she passed the information on to a friend in Japan to be the go between person.

At the moment it sounds like it'll be about $600-700 if I supply an ECU, including removing the speed limiter and throttle restriction. They'd prefer to have the whole car, but obviously that's not possible.

I'll keep everyone posted, but I might want to borrow that ECU sooner rather than later Craig :thanks:

Good stuff. I would definitely be interested in a remap especially if we can get better economy as well as the removal of the throttle restrictions down low.

Hate to break it to you mate, you'll never get better economy when you have a more responsive throttle and more power!

unless you want spend 5k and get LPG installed :whistling:

Hate to break it to you mate, you'll never get better economy when you have a more responsive throttle and more power!

Is that working under the assumption that with a more responsive throttle and more power you'll be more inclined to put your foot down?

Hate to break it to you mate, you'll never get better economy when you have a more responsive throttle and more power!

What's the throttle controlled by!

Edited by Jetwreck

I'm actually in the process of doing this at the moment.

After I saw that listing on Import Monster, I spoke to a colleague who knows Japanese, and she passed the information on to a friend in Japan to be the go between person.

At the moment it sounds like it'll be about $600-700 if I supply an ECU, including removing the speed limiter and throttle restriction. They'd prefer to have the whole car, but obviously that's not possible.

I'll keep everyone posted, but I might want to borrow that ECU sooner rather than later Craig :thanks:

Definitely keep us informed of how this progresses, I dare say there's enough demand to justify your effort!

Definitely keep us informed of how this progresses, I dare say there's enough demand to justify your effort!

There's enough demand right here to justify the effort :nyaanyaa:

I'd say it'll be easier with a Japanese translator, just have to work out cost and procedure, then maybe we can organise to send a few over, assuming the first one goes ok?

Happy to be the guinea rat, sounds like it'll be worthwhile regardless of what aftermarket stuff I run later.

I have a spare ecu also if it all works out. :)

You will still need some way of adjusting fuel and timing though if you have gone the highflow path... No way you can guess that tune from the other side of the world.

Just rip out all the VCT and put some big f#$k off solid lift cam's in.....the idle would be awesome!!!!!!.....lol!

I had the lumpy idle yesterday. lol. The engine wanted to stall with the actuators on full advance.

I have a spare ecu also if it all works out. :)

You will still need some way of adjusting fuel and timing though if you have gone the highflow path... No way you can guess that tune from the other side of the world.

Good thing I found that Emanage CD last nite!

Hate to break it to you mate, you'll never get better economy when you have a more responsive throttle and more power!

unless you want spend 5k and get LPG installed :whistling:

Well I'm guessing that part of the tuning may well be a leaning off of the A/F ratios which will most certainly give better economy. Not everyone drives like a wanker and has to fang it non stop. Better off boost and low boost around town economy should be easily achieved by this. I can accept poor economy if I cane it but when I drive on the highway or around town with the kids in the car I would like better economy than I'm getting now.

The VQ35de data I am using to control it must have a different signal to run its hydraulic cam retarders, and there doesn't seem to be any other CVCT VQ's listed. Does anyone know of a different VQ that runs the same electromagnetic actuator?

Might be clutching at straws, but the VQ35HR motor had hydraulic intake and electromagnetic exhaust. that help at all?

What's the throttle controlled by!

complex answer on a VQ25det!!! :wacko:

The HR isnt supported by Greddy, why I have no idea, its only programming the pwm outputs as far as I know. Cant find an english manual anywhere either. Not the smartest considering half their gear is bought by overseas customers these days.

I wish there was better support for this as its a great product with many uses, these variable cam engines are just starting to be unleashed.

I have a spare ecu also if it all works out. :)

You will still need some way of adjusting fuel and timing though if you have gone the highflow path... No way you can guess that tune from the other side of the world.

I haven't gone down that path yet, but I will. I figured when I got to that point I'd need an Emanage or something similar regardless of whether I get the G-Zone done.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...