Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Jean Claude Van Dam,

looked in peak condition on " Blood Sport", and was the original world kick boxing champ. :starwars:

im now getting a VB out of the fridge to help maintain my manliness after looking at this thread.. lol

Edited by SliverS2
  • 2 weeks later...

Strong estats. 5ft10 105kg less than 10%bf not on gear? Arnie was about 110kg at contest weight and he was like 6ft3. I got nothing against people who use gear but the people who claim there not on gear when they clearly are gets to me lol.

Yeah Chris Evans was looking pretty swole in the avengers (nohomo)

Edited by Dani Boi

There's a 107 kilo bloke that works at Penrith McDonalds.

He's 100% natural - been building for 6 years.

The "juice" is for rapid growth, and quick regen.

You don't need it to be huge, or built and ripped.

Edited by FrakMunkie

105kg @ 5'10? Might not be the biggest photo of him but I'd have expected bigger/wider with those stats...if that's his height he looks 95kg to me. Maybe he has gargantuan legs.

Jean Claude Van Dam,

looked in peak condition on " Blood Sport", and was the original world kick boxing champ. :starwars:

Damme*

he was never a world kick boxing champ...

he was the european middleweight karate champion

but yeah he looked good back then and doesn't look too bad now either

Edited by R-SPEC

There's a 107 kilo bloke that works at Penrith McDonalds.

He's 100% natural - been building for 6 years.

The "juice" is for rapid growth, and quick regen.

You don't need it to be huge, or built and ripped.

dat dere maccas diet.... guaranteed to get you up to 107kg in 6 years or your money back

mcdonaldsad.jpg?t=1241926257

was reminiscing last night and watching some good ole WcW, WWF and WWE.

Always thought Goldberg was a big c**t

BillGoldbergClr.jpg

Also HHH back in the day

422d7a8e0edcc392b67c14058bfb11cf.jpg

Lastly Randy Orton

RandyOrton2_display_image.jpg?1303662066

I left out Scot Stiener, Lex Luger, Buff Bagwell and a fair few others...

Lastly sorry about the spandex undies :P

Photo doesn't show Orton's best feature; his quads.

Would be interesting to see photos of HHH before he hit the gym/roids. I think he'd have had something of a thin/normal frame width, thus he has such a large back-to-front imbalance from his enormous lats - not much shoulder width to counter it. I suffer from a similar thing albeit not on the same scale lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
    • Well this shows me the fuel pump relay is inside the base of the drivers A Pillar, and goes into the main power wire, and it connects to the ignition. The alarm is.... in the base of the drivers A Pillar. The issue is that I'm not getting 12v to the pump at ignition which tells me that relay isn't being triggered. AVS told me the immobiliser should be open until the ignition is active. So once ignition is active, the immobiliser relay should be telling that fuel pump relay to close which completes the circuit. But I'm not getting voltage at the relay in the rear triggered by the ECU, which leaves me back at the same assumption that that relay was never connected into the immobiliser. This is what I'm trying to verify, that my assumption is the most likely scenario and I'll go back to the alarm tech yet again that he needs to fix his work.      Here is the alarms wiring diagram, so my assumption is IM3A, IM3B, or both, aren't connected or improper. But this is all sealed up, with black wiring, and loomed  
×
×
  • Create New...