Jump to content
SAU Community

Post Your Ideal Physique


dan_the_man
 Share

Recommended Posts

Photo doesn't show Orton's best feature; his quads.

Would be interesting to see photos of HHH before he hit the gym/roids. I think he'd have had something of a thin/normal frame width, thus he has such a large back-to-front imbalance from his enormous lats - not much shoulder width to counter it. I suffer from a similar thing albeit not on the same scale lol.

he was smaller when he was younger, but he said it didnt take him long to put size on. He had a pretty decent foundation to work with as far as height, weight and width goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You still gotta lift like a possessed man to get big, no matter if you are on the juice or not. Steroids just speed up the process.

Most wrestlers are all a bit thick through the midsection for my liking. Randy orton looks the best out of the ones posted IMO.

The rock is a deadset unit these days though!

Edited by Mitcho_7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Each to their own, both excell in their chosen fields, Froning would destroy Mr Johnson at Crossfit, just as the Mr Johnson would destroy Rich at Pro Wrestling and acting, oh wait, thats the same thing.

Steroids is a mute point, most top flight athletes have used

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think for the sake of this thread we should really be avoiding extremes like Dwayne. Sure, you might long to have his body, but really for almost everyone in here it's such a silly thing to desire given his genetics and obvious steroid use.

I'm not ranting against steroids here, but it just seems silly in my mind for him to be your ideal physique

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Embrace the freedom of casual encounters on the best dating app in town! Verified Maidens Superlative Сasual Dating
    • Slimline sub on the rear parcel shelf is doable. Pioneer TS-WX140DA is only 70mm high.   
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...