Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Photo doesn't show Orton's best feature; his quads.

Would be interesting to see photos of HHH before he hit the gym/roids. I think he'd have had something of a thin/normal frame width, thus he has such a large back-to-front imbalance from his enormous lats - not much shoulder width to counter it. I suffer from a similar thing albeit not on the same scale lol.

he was smaller when he was younger, but he said it didnt take him long to put size on. He had a pretty decent foundation to work with as far as height, weight and width goes.

You still gotta lift like a possessed man to get big, no matter if you are on the juice or not. Steroids just speed up the process.

Most wrestlers are all a bit thick through the midsection for my liking. Randy orton looks the best out of the ones posted IMO.

The rock is a deadset unit these days though!

Edited by Mitcho_7
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

every time i find a new pic, it's somehow still as impressive as when i first saw him

Arnold-Schwarzenegger-Wallpaper-HD-1920x1080.jpg

Except you break the image brah. Fixed :P

EDIT: ok maybe it was only broken for me. Either way, quoted for truth!

  • 3 weeks later...

Each to their own, both excell in their chosen fields, Froning would destroy Mr Johnson at Crossfit, just as the Mr Johnson would destroy Rich at Pro Wrestling and acting, oh wait, thats the same thing.

Steroids is a mute point, most top flight athletes have used

I think for the sake of this thread we should really be avoiding extremes like Dwayne. Sure, you might long to have his body, but really for almost everyone in here it's such a silly thing to desire given his genetics and obvious steroid use.

I'm not ranting against steroids here, but it just seems silly in my mind for him to be your ideal physique

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Restoring r33 series 1 rb25det. All the heater hoses were on their way out, have replaced them and put it all back together. After testing I noticed a small leak from behind the head on the actual metal water line to the turbo when cars warm. I tried running a longer hose over it but it kept leaking...   I am about to take the (stock) manifold off again😔 to change the water line does any one have any lines they recommend? I was looking at Aeroflow Turbo Oil & Water Line Set but not sure what everyone else recommends. Car is completely stock but want to upgrade turbo eventually. it looks like ill have to disconnect a lot just to replace these lines so if there's anything else recommended to do please let me know. Thank you in advance!
    • From memory, on the R33 GTSt at least, while everyone says "It's not adjustable", I found when I changed clutches in mine, it just needed a small adjustment on the rod length. But be very wary here, as you could end up trying to push the pushrod in the master too far, or blowing out the slave.   Most likely though, if the master/slave isn't bypassing internally or leaking out, then the throw out is the wrong height compared to the fingers on the clutch, so when it moves to disengage the clutch, it isn't 100% disengaged. You can check part of this out too by jacking the car up, having the engine running, put your foot on the clutch and try to engage 1st gear. If it goes in pretty easy (Compared to the ground) and/or the wheels start turning a fair bit and it takes a bit too much brake pedal to bring them back to a stop, this is likely the issue.  I'm not sure if you can adjust the height of the forks etc in these though, it's been that long since I've touched any RB gearbox.
    • That's all good, I thought I was missing some interesting feature! Maybe @PranK can double check if that is something that is meant to be operating or not.
    • I hope that is not something that bad. From what i remember he said that only first gear is "hard" to get in and that he has couple of ideas what to try next but idk 😕  hope it is not gearbox out. I will let you know.
    • If it's not the hydraulics, it is probably gearbox back out. Usually as per @Duncan's post, or otherwise associated with not getting the throwout fork positioned correctly. All the way up to catastrophically bolting shit back together without it being aligned properly and wrecking the clutch/input shaft/flywheel/something else.
×
×
  • Create New...