Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh dear, looksee what has happened now.... We may have lost one of our brightest, consistent and most informative poster's ever !

Damn you, Damn you all

I needed to know so much more..... and now..... i never will

*sigh*

I know, I'm sorry.confused.gif

Please come back UNDR8ED; all is forgiven.

Please share your boundless knowledge of how to use unnecessary capitalisation and numerals within words to convey your vast wisdom; we are lost, and have much to learn.

Edited by Daleo

I know, I'm sorry.confused.gif

Please come back UNDR8ED; all is forgiven.

Please share your boundless knowledge of how to use unnecessary capitalisation and numerals within words to convey your vast wisdom; we are lost, and have much to learn.

I can't even pronounce his name without help.

Is he under bed ? Thats just plain weird man !

Damn it .....I was wondering if he was ever going to inform us the the m35 doesn't have an RB! :P

Seriously what a f{:content:}amp;ktard!

FARKEN WHAT!?!?!? thats the reason i bought a Stagea for all the plentifull and cheep RB goodies to bolt on :( damnit should've bought a skyline!!!

My GTX3071 made 288rwkw on 98 at 21psi im now on E85 and at 18psi made 307rwkw and on 22psi with major boost leaks got up to 312kw with predictions of theoretical possibility of 350rwkw.

GTX3076 some boys are making 360-400rwkw on E85

so whats the figures on these???

GTX3071.......... is that the stage 1 hiflow option? 270kw max?

GTX3076.......... and this is the stage 2 hiflow ? 270kw+ ?

My GTX3071 made 288rwkw on 98 at 21psi im now on E85 and at 18psi made 307rwkw and on 22psi with major boost leaks got up to 312kw with predictions of theoretical possibility of 350rwkw.

GTX3076 some boys are making 360-400rwkw on E85

is that on a VQ25DET with 4WD ? otherwise those figures are kinda pointless...........

altho a HP figure on the crank would be useful :)

My GTX3071 made 288rwkw on 98 at 21psi im now on E85 and at 18psi made 307rwkw and on 22psi with major boost leaks got up to 312kw with predictions of theoretical possibility of 350rwkw.

GTX3076 some boys are making 360-400rwkw on E85

I have your GTX3071 at 278.5 as tuned with 98ron. It is a bigger jump with the E85 than you are quoting. Keep in mind my old school GT3076 with ATP TS housing seemed to come on earlier than the smaller 71mm GTX with 98ron.

The claims of 360-400rwkw with E85 might be coming from a certain dyno which seems to produce some higher results than many others so make sure you compare apples with apples. Early results show the GTX3076 to be very similar to a GT3082 aka GT3040. The turbine has proven to be the limiting factor on these turbos.

Scotty has the bigger Tial housing (from memory) so the 76mm GTX compressor will have every chance but ultimately I reckon the 71mm compressor is not the limitation.

It peaked at 288kw but was bought down to a "safe" 278kw :whistling:

Dyno figures for the GTX3076 are in the RB25 dyno thread dont know what dyno was used simply requoting figures

You love bringing up that the ole 3076 comes on sooner than the GTX dont ya mate lol :nyaanyaa:

I'm guessing the current gtx3071 is good for around 320 on ethanol, on an m35, hopefully the 76 can add 30 to that figure so around 350awkw, perhaps a little less with the .82 rear on it. That's the next goal anyway.

Not sure the box will be happy with that figure, even the 33gtr box I hope to slip in may not handle it for long.

so whats the figures on these???

GTX3071.......... is that the stage 1 hiflow option? 270kw max?

GTX3076.......... and this is the stage 2 hiflow ? 270kw+ ?

These are not highflow turbos, they are large housing surge ported Garrett turbo's with external gating, much more chance of a higher figure.

Will the GTR box drop straight in scotty or will it need mods? Has anyone ever looked into or tried Cryotech for gearbox parts dont know the exact process but they use liquid nitrogen and put them under vacuum i believe and claim that it hardens things by 300% NASA stumbled on it when all the space shuttles returned harder than were originally made? I recall seeing its around $60 a kg or something would be a cheap alternative for a hardened GTR gearbox if the claims are true :blush:

I'm guessing the current gtx3071 is good for around 320 on ethanol, on an m35, hopefully the 76 can add 30 to that figure so around 350awkw, perhaps a little less with the .82 rear on it. That's the next goal anyway.

Not sure the box will be happy with that figure, even the 33gtr box I hope to slip in may not handle it for long.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...