Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I've noticed that after a number of hot laps the car will want to understeer at Winton, most notably through the left handed sweeper and coming out of the cleavage up the back. I realise some of this will be due to overheating the tyres, and I'm playing with pressures at present but I'm also interested to know what else I can do to increase outright front grip, not just increase the time before the tyres start to go off and get greasy.

Car is as follows.

S13, CA18DET, mild mods for around 165rwkw, mild weight reduction, rear interior removed air con and stereo fully removed, battery in the boot passenger side.

- Car has BC BR Coilovers (8kg front 6kg rear).

- Damper is currently set on 4 clicks from softest of 32 settings up front but I'm playing with this as the harder I go damper, the less roll I have but the faster tyres go off, lowering the hot pressure seems to negate this though. I wold not say the car rolls excessively as is evidenced by tyre wear (see below). Rear damper is softer for max power down, also has C-West wing (rear grip is no issue what so ever).

- Tyres are Federal 595 RS-R 235/45/17 (8" front, 9" rear rims). Last tested at 36psi hot front and rear. Ran a PB by 3 tenths compared to old RE55s so grip is reasonable from these.

- Car has approx -2.2-2.3 camber up front, -1 at rear.

- 0 toe up front, few mm total toe in at the rear (somewhat due to an ever so slighty bent toe arm which are getting replaced).

- 5-6 deg castor front.

- Basic strut brace up front, none in the rear

- Standard sway bars (suspect replacing this could help but as the spring rates are already quite high for an S13 it may not be required)

- S15 power steering rack and super pro bushes, good condition tie rods etc

- From an aero point of view, I have a standard CA front bar with some venting cut into both sides for oil cooler and CAI, the lower edge does taper back towards the car on an angle so a small amount of lift could be generated there possibly.

I suspect I need to focus more on mechanical grip rather than aero as the car is only entering the left handed sweeper at about 130km/h.

I realise going back to R-Comps will help to some degree but at this point that is not an option as the RS-Rs are cheap, have decent grip and, are only 2 track days old.

What can I do suspension wise to improve front end grip? Initial turn in is good, it's mid corner and exiting when I'm trying to get on the gas as early as possible that I start to see understeer. I'm interested in tuning the current setup or replacing stock parts, not replacing already upgraded parts.

Is it worth me knocking up front splitter and undertray for the front of the car? Do I need more camber perhaps? Tyre wear looks good and it is not feathering the outside edges that I can see.

Hopefully that's enough info. if you need to know anything else let me know.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378423-reducing-understeer-in-a-track-car/
Share on other sites

Understeer is basically a lack of grip at the front, or, conversely TOO MUCH grip at the rear.

Standard sway bars (suspect replacing this could help but as the spring rates are already quite high for an S13 it may not be required)
You shouldn't use springs / shocks to control body roll - that's what sway bars are for. So, use a slightly stiffer REAR bar.

Take a bit of camber from the REAR - drop to maybe -0.5 deg neg.

Maybe soften off the front springs a bit.

Absolutely add some rear bar and/or lighten the front bar. In fact, take the front bar off the car (or just disconnect it and tie it up out of the way) and go for a drive - see if you surprise yourself about how big a change to bar stiffness you need to make before you notice it. It will probably be far too big a change and oversteer a lot, but you'll get the idea pretty quickly.

Why would you take camber out of the rear if it's understeering on a heated tire??

Spring rates are too high for an S13 on a R or RS comp tire.

A firm chassis is forced to use it's tire for lateral grip instead of it's own compliance.

The other major thing wrong with the setup you've explained which wasn't mentioned above is the lack of any toe on the front.

Toe the front out .8-1.0mm static. Typically on a Nissan with good bushings you will end up with 1.2-1.5mm out dynamic and .5-.6mm out under brakes.

Toe out will increase the initial turn in and make the direction change very precise. It will also help the chassis take a set on the spring and shock mid corner as the inner tire creates a sharper turn radius for the rear to pivot around. It does work the tire a little harder so you may want to increase front camber .5 and the rear use 1mm neg.

I'd bet with tire pressures those basic changes to allignement it will be 10 times better

So the consensus appears to be along the lines of this.

Adjust for some toe out up front, up to around 1mm (each side or total static?)

Replace the factory sway bars so I'm not relying on the spring rates/damper settings to control body roll

I can't easily change spring rates so they will have to stay, this is just budget club sport after all.

I think I'm at the max of the front camber, I may be able to get it up to around -2.5 but I don't think going heaps more camber is the answer as my corner speeds aren't "that" high and if the car isn't leaning over enough I'll be chewing out inside edges.

If I recall correctly, I think R32 GTS-T or GT-R factory front sway bars fit S13's and are a nice upgrade.

I also need to get some toe arms to correct the toe in at rear, as I understand it it should be 0 or at the most 1mm total static toe in for stability, at present it's a bit more than that due to aforementioned toe arm damage.

Thoughts?

Will have to read over lunch, bit long to read on the clock.

Something I had stupidly overlooked though is perhaps my entry speed is too high for the car setup, but that's why I want to adjust the setup so I can take the corner faster. This will be especially important when I upgrade my turbo for more killer wasps.

It does work the tire a little harder so you may want to increase front camber .5 and the rear use 1mm neg.

I'd bet with tire pressures those basic changes to allignement it will be 10 times better

Just on that, you mean rear toe 1mm total static?

What are your thoughts on running more front camber and replacing the stock front sway bar?

Getting just a stiffer front sway bar will promote more understeer, because it will work the front tyres harder when they're already past their limit. You need to make the rear tyres resist more of the cornering force with a stiffer rear bar. Sways bars are often the best bang for your buck suspension mod, so IMO you should get adjustables for both front and rear, and play with the balance. If you're really tight, just get the rear bar.

I got the whitelines for my GTR, the front is on full soft and the rear full hard, to get as much understeer out as possible. This compliments the attessa tweaker which pushes more power to the front (so more tendency for understeer).

Stiffer front swaybar will induce more understeer, as mentioned above you probably want to go stiffer on the rear.

On the topic of swaybars, you will find the 32GTSt (RWD platform) has a bigger front than rear whereas the 32GTR (AWD) will have a bigger rear than front.

A related anecdote - My R32 came with front and rear bars that I never paid any attention to, thinking that they were standard. They may in fact have been standard - I haven't checked to see what the standard front bar size is. But I get ahead of myself. The whole time I have had my car (many years) I've been sufferring from enough understeer to be annoying, and have fiddled around the edges with changing stuff to try to dial it out. It turned in well, but loved a mid corner understeer. Recently I bit the bullet and bought the 24mm adjustable Whiteline bar for the rear. Suspected that it might be too big, but was willing to try it. Got the original bar off and it was tiny - like 14mm or something. That's the standard auto rear bar. Car used to be auto. Put the 24mm bar in, and it was like night and day. The understeer was gone. And it didn't become a tail happy monster either. Put the verniers on the front bar and it's like 22mm. It's no wonder the car liked to understeer. And it's no wonder that it took the 24mm bar without upsetting things. Tyre life has improved quite a lot too. No front end scrubbing and no provoked power oversteer to try to counter it when having fun = nicer treatment of tyres.

keep playing with the tyre pressure some more.

probably want the fronts a little lower if it seems to be understeering.

drop front damper (suspension) to lowest point and work up a click at a time from there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...