Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You were too busy eating dick

Need to go back to sleep

what?

on topic of movies. I booked twilight for the missus. shes been hassling me about it for a while. booked gold class so i can enter, and sleep for a good couple of hours..

I think flynn might be jelous that im not appreciative of his skinny white boyfriend. :nyaanyaa:

Sleep at work?

Maybe, but got some meetings today to prepare for

what?

on topic of movies. I booked twilight for the missus. shes been hassling me about it for a while. booked gold class so i can enter, and sleep for a good couple of hours..

I think flynn might be jelous that im not appreciative of his skinny white boyfriend. :nyaanyaa:

Pretty sure my missus will want to see that. Saw the ad, looked boring. Did not see one scene of action :/

Do you want every customer in the restaurant to come and thank you? I'd imagine that would get annoying and interrupt a busy kitchen.. Then there's the health & safety issues of customers coming into the kitchen.

If it's just celebrities, seems like ego stroking to me

I never go and thank the chef at a restaurant and I don't think I'm rude or lacking manners

e

it's an open kitchen that you have to walk past to leave the venue.

you have to come within 1m of the chef on the pass and are looking right at him... MOST people have the manners to give you a freindly nod, or say a passing thanks. however most celebs are too god even for this

Couldn't of put it better my self :)

The only way In Time could be fully enjoyed is make a drinking game whenever someone says "time" in the movie. You will be drunk halfway through the movie and most likely dead at the end of it.

There were two things that made me want to see this movie: 1) The premise sounded interesting. The fact that it's about people living off time, with the rich living forever and the poor living off borrowed time is a rather thought-provoking one. And 2) I like Justin Timberlake. What saddens me is that he just wasn't very good in this movie, as he and the dowey-eyed Amanda Siegfried both just seem so bored throughout the entire movie. They have zero chemistry and I'm even going to say that they are just as bad as Anakin and Padme in Star Wars. That's the lowest bar you can go in the chemistry lab.

Not only did Justin Timberlake seem bored, but he also has a hard time conveying certain emotions. Take the scene where his mother dies in his arms, for instance. Wasn't convinced, Justin. His crying felt forced and it was. After that he vows revenge against all the time people, and risks being chased by the Timekeeper (the always awesome Cillian Murphy), and after he is given a decade worth of time from someone who is tired of living, he meets up with some rich people and kidnaps a rather high Amanda Siegfried and then starts taking time, and giving it to people, you know, like Robin Hood.... except with time. They work together, bored the whole way through, and they try to convey emotions like love.... because if you have a guy and a girl on screen together, you have to make them full in love. That's Hollywood 101 right there!

This is really disappointing to me because I expected better out of In Time. What I got is pretty much a boring movie, with a premise that sounded interesting but then it turns the movie into a one-note-wonder. If I could turn back time, I would have seen Puss In Boots instead.

what?

on topic of movies. I booked twilight for the missus. shes been hassling me about it for a while. booked gold class so i can enter, and sleep for a good couple of hours..

i laughed so much in the second one i nearly got kicked out of the movie theater. the gf at the time wasnt too happy with me either lol. srsly what the f**k kinda vampire glitters? and is a f**king virgin?

Obama in Australia=

27 cars

5 planes

1 helicopter

100 secret service agents

numerous rooftop snipers wherever he goes.

ObamaRage.jpg

lol i heard that they left most of the timesheets for the agents checking out possible places he's gonna visit in an unattended van in the cbd. security fail

i laughed so much in the second one i nearly got kicked out of the movie theater. the gf at the time wasnt too happy with me either lol. srsly what the f**k kinda vampire glitters? and is a f**king virgin?

lol i heard that they left most of the timesheets for the agents checking out possible places he's gonna visit in an unattended van in the cbd. security fail

hahhahahah i think the same thing. but i havnt taken her out in a while so i thought i may as well suck it up

Australia would be a perfect place to assassinate. He IS number one on Al Qaeda's hit list, and those kunts can be anywhere.

inb4 Al Qaeda is an American fabrication.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...