Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So which option give you 40 million?!

for final heist? dunno - i ended up using the people that cost the most for 100% sure completion (instead of losing shit like i did in the first heist by cheaping out), and doing the sneaky approach. ended up with ~20mil per character, plenty enough for what i need. i do like the idea though of doing a replay but not doing any of the assassination missions until after the main story if possible - can then spend massive dollars on investments instead of like 100k.

ah wait here we go

  • Hotel Assassination: Invest in BettaPharmaceuticals (BAWSAQ) before the mission. Look for a 40-50% return.
  • Multi-target Assassination: Invest in Debonaire (LCN) before the mission. Look for a 80-90% return. Immediately invest in Redwood (LCN) after selling your Debonaire stock as Redwood will see a 300% increase within days.
  • Vice Assassination: Invest in Fruit (BAWSAQ) before the mission. Look for a 50-60% return.
  • Bus Assassination: Invest in Vapid (BAWSAQ) after the mission. Ignore any graphs or green/red arrows, if the stock value is well below the "low" value, invest. Look for a 80-90% return (I had to die once before there was any change to the stock).
  • Construction Assassination: Invest in GoldCoast (LCN) before the mission. Look for a 80-90% return.

the fifth one on that other list is a random event as you drive up the west coast - dude wants you to get him to the airport and gives you a tip when you drop him off; 30% return on it.

BAWSAQ is the online one but certain stocks affected by in game actions (a la Lester's missions) are affected as such temporarily.

Sped through the main missions on my second run. Finished yesterday.

Did all of Lester's assassinations this evening. Had about 32mil on each character after final heist. Played the stocks as people have said: cpd put up the most concise guide so follow that.

Made Franklin a billionaire (he's my main guy, he owns all the properties), got a bit Lazy with Michael, only did the pre-mission investments for immediate cash in, more than enough for all his cinemas.

and couldn't give a flying f**k about Trevor.

Yeah, I had heaps of trouble at first with Trevor - too much of a psycho, and how he treats people. Had to skip all his cutscenes.

He seems to mellow out to just being weird by the end though, so it was easier to watch.

Gonna have to run through again; can't wait for PC and 1440p and mouse aiming though! Stupid thumbstick. Would give up auto-aim for mouse any day.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...