Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My friend and I are looking into getting a loan for a brand new house sometime next year and he will be putting the deposit on it and the house will most likely be under his name and will be paying 50/50 towards the loan, but what my question is where do I stand if for example push comes to shove we have a fall out, can he take it all? Or is there some sort of contract I can get? Just need some legal advice if possible

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385471-advice-on-getting-a-house/
Share on other sites

Any reason why you don't want it under your name?

Unless you have some written binding agreement that holds up in court, I wouldn't do it unless it was with family.

All i'll say is that if it's an investment property, he'll reap all the tax benefits. Though you can always work out something under the table.

If you have an agreement drawn up there's no reason you can't do it with a mate, you'd just want it to be a mate that you've had fights/arguments with before and stayed friends throughout so you know your friendship and money isn't going to turn to shit over something small. Because worst case scenario you sell the house, pay of the mortgage with early exit and anything leftover you split down the middle, but it would still be a pain in the arse to go through all that.

Another way to do it is to have you and your friend directors in a company that invests in the house, that way your shareholders agreement is your binding contract. The overdraft account goes under the company name and then your mate can't just say it's only been him contributing to the mortgage. But you might miss out on some tax benefits with this way - Tony might know more about this :P

Two things to consider:

- If you both plan on living there, try living together in a 6 month lease or something first just to see how you get along. So many people find out that being friends with someone and living with them are two different worlds.

- What happens if one of you loses your job, can the other afford to cover the repayments (assuming you're not negative gearing with a tenancy)...will they be happy to until you get back on your feet etc.

Any reason why you don't want it under your name?

Unless you have some written binding agreement that holds up in court, I wouldn't do it unless it was with family.

All i'll say is that if it's an investment property, he'll reap all the tax benefits. Though you can always work out something under the table.

cant afford the deposit any time soon so my friend is going to do it therefore it would only be right if it was under his, it wont be a investment property, just a place we can move into

my personal advice?

sell your GTR

buy your own investment property in your name (any area with good growth, not necesarily the best suburb)

but another GTR when you're finished and the property has settled

removes risk

the place is in your name

you have an investment property

finance is easy once you have an investment property

my personal advice?

sell your GTR

buy your own investment property in your name (any area with good growth, not necesarily the best suburb)

but another GTR when you're finished and the property has settled

removes risk

the place is in your name

you have an investment property

finance is easy once you have an investment property

This!

Im stuck in a Honda but at least i bought my own place. Save alot of money not thinking about your next "mod" on the car. Not fun but it helps if you do it.

Going with a mate because you dont have enough money, well, guess what, you will be even worse off when you by the place...youll be broke.

Another way to do it is to have you and your friend directors in a company that invests in the house, that way your shareholders agreement is your binding contract. The overdraft account goes under the company name and then your mate can't just say it's only been him contributing to the mortgage. But you might miss out on some tax benefits with this way - Tony might know more about this :P

Since my name was metioned I'll post a reply :P. Generally people would never purchase a property in a company entity unless there are asset protection issues due to the following reasons:

- Lose the main residence exemption

- Not entitled to the 50% discount on capital gain

- Capital losses and revenue losses are quaratined within the company

- Increases compliance costs

Above points are a mix of an investment/residential property issues but you get the gist of things.

cant afford the deposit any time soon so my friend is going to do it therefore it would only be right if it was under his, it wont be a investment property, just a place we can move into

If you plan to go down this route, what I would do is have a written agreement where by the sales proceeds of the property firstly goes to cover your friends deposit. I.e on sale of the property the first $50K of the property is to go to 'Joe Blogs' with the residual to be split equally between the joint owners.

This covers your mates goodwill and will reduce complications down the track.

Now you owe me a few bourbon and cokes :P

I think it's a fantastic idea and great way to break into market.

I live with two guys (friends since highschool) who have bought together. If drawn up properly there is no confusion or problem provided you both understand the conditions from the start

I have bought a house with a mate. Working well. Having said that he's the only person I know that I trust enough to do it. End of the day it comes down to the people involved. I know people that done it with family and it split up the family.

Contracts are a pain in the arse but it needs to be done.

^ yeah when I say 'friend' I mean his a really close friend but at the end of the day if I have no solid ground to stand on if we do have a fall out I'm screwed with nothing to back me up, that's why I just want know if there is something I can do to cover my ass :/

Yes, a legal agreement...and maintain records of YOU contributing directly to the payment of the mortgage, evidence of you living in the house etc. That way if the agreement is disputed legally, you have documents to stand on. Other than that, worst case scenario you flog the house off and split the residual if there is any.

The good news is that the sooner the deal turns to shit, the less you've contributed towards the mortgage and could stand to "lose", and the longer the deal lasts, the more cemented it will be.

Another consideration on the early deal break is girlfriends...if either of you get a long term girlfriend, will they be comfortable living in that flatmate arrangement until you have the house paid off or ready to sell...or will your mate want to sell and move out with his girlfriend etc.?

Lol whatchu talkin about Alex. I'm sure he knows that, but his talking about possibly buying a house with a friend and having the title 100% in his friends name and the consequences.

Anyways, Birds does raise a good point re what happens in unforeseen circumstances if one party wants 'out' or can no longer service the mortgage. Shit may get complicated.

In any case don't have the title 100% in his name. If he decides not to honour it in the end and not give you your share, your going to have to go to court and you will have headaches. Even if you have the legal paperwork in place in will be up to the discretion of the Judge to interpret the case.

So yeah if you go ahead with this, have the property in both names and sort out the legal paperwork so you mate gets his deposit back on sale of property.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...