Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 231
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

to run a 10 in a full weight gtst, you will need good tyres, try aim for something better then ET street radials because they wont cut it, about 375rwkw, a good clutch and also a decent launch control and ecu with a tuner who can sit with you at the track and play with boost control trim on gears, boost control trim on wheel spin, and ignition timing retard on wheelspin, and also the launch control must not spool too much boost off the mark.

you need a 1.6 or lower 60 foot before you will grab it also.

Its not easy to do on a full weight street car, but i never gave up until i cracked it, i ran 10.80 @ 135mph before i gave up.

if you want to run the 10 you need to put in some hard work!

Except it hasn't done a 10 yet :P

I differ in opinion to most people who want to run 10s

A single 10.9999999 is different to a car setup to run half a dozen in a row. That is where car setup is important

I also don't like to see people wanting a 10 sec streeter but not want to drag "race" ie something other than a off street Wednesday night

I understand not everyone wants to cage their car....

If you don't, set it up to run consistent low 11's and hit the track as much as you like

That's gotta be one* of the dumber things you've posted.

*aside from the 2JZ/Supra talk on a RB/Skyline based forum

If someone wants a street car, on DOT radials that can run a 10.

And drive it around daily, for a reasonable budget - who cares about a "real" comp.

That's gotta be one* of the dumber things you've posted.

*aside from the 2JZ/Supra talk on a RB/Skyline based forum

If someone wants a street car, on DOT radials that can run a 10.

And drive it around daily, for a reasonable budget - who cares about a "real" comp.

LOL I agree with that one, that Zebra seriously needs to go back to the zoo! ..Saying after reading some of his posts..>_<

ahhh you guys are f**king retarded >_<

you guys want to spend 11ty $$$$ on getting a car to run a 10...ONCE..because you will be booted...then what....spend more money on changing it to a circuit car

Silly me for thinking people who want a "10 second car" actually want to run 10's more than once.

Its like buying a V8 Commodore.... Its no special supercar out of the factory, not unless you buy something really expensive..

But hey if you want a V8 taxi then thats good for you. On the same token if somebody wants a 10 second skyline for the sake of saying I have a 10 second skyline then good for them too LOL

*aside from the 2JZ/Supra talk on a RB/Skyline based forum

Oh Noez!!!!

God Forbid any variety on the internet....Don't tell me you snatched the rights to "Nissan Skyline" too so you can claim it as your own and make money of others hard work

i thought WSID was introducing the new rule cause heaps of owners of new Fords & holdens where complaining about putting cages in there brand new $80K cars..

most these cars can run 10's for under $5000 of mods..

to run a 10 in a full weight gtst, you will need good tyres, try aim for something better then ET street radials because they wont cut it, about 375rwkw, a good clutch and also a decent launch control and ecu with a tuner who can sit with you at the track and play with boost control trim on gears, boost control trim on wheel spin, and ignition timing retard on wheelspin, and also the launch control must not spool too much boost off the mark.

you need a 1.6 or lower 60 foot before you will grab it also.

Its not easy to do on a full weight street car, but i never gave up until i cracked it, i ran 10.80 @ 135mph before i gave up.

if you want to run the 10 you need to put in some hard work!

Ive gone the easy way and have a C4 and 3800 stall. But dont have the 10 yet but shouldnt be far away :thumbsup:

Most people also don't realise how quick a 10 second car is. Fastest car i've ever been in was my dads R33 with 350rwkw, did a low-mid 11 @ 125mph which was freaking quick. Not saying this about OP, but a lot of guys go from a stock liner and think "oh i want a 10 second car hepa derpa" without knowing how quick it really is.

i thought WSID was introducing the new rule cause heaps of owners of new Fords & holdens where complaining about putting cages in there brand new $80K cars..

most these cars can run 10's for under $5000 of mods..

Nope, they did a backflip on the decision unfortunately

never happen on street tyres

drag radials as a minimum and you would be looking at 550+bhp at the crank to get you a high 10 at around 130mph after lots of practice

Auto or manual?

Lots of practice.... PFFT I did one pass :nyaanyaa: But I guess it wasn't a 10 :pirate:

In a manual, you would need atleast 400rwkw and MT Streets and know how to drive. Really drive.

I had 360rwkw (dyno dynamics) or 410rwkw (dynapac with correction) and yes knowing how to peddle well and smash gears helps

to run a 10 in a full weight gtst, you will need good tyres, try aim for something better then ET street radials because they wont cut it, about 375rwkw, a good clutch and also a decent launch control and ecu with a tuner who can sit with you at the track and play with boost control trim on gears, boost control trim on wheel spin, and ignition timing retard on wheelspin, and also the launch control must not spool too much boost off the mark.

you need a 1.6 or lower 60 foot before you will grab it also.

Its not easy to do on a full weight street car, but i never gave up until i cracked it, i ran 10.80 @ 135mph before i gave up.

if you want to run the 10 you need to put in some hard work!

I don't think you need a lot of the things you have listed >_<

Most people also don't realise how quick a 10 second car is. Fastest car i've ever been in was my dads R33 with 350rwkw, did a low-mid 11 @ 125mph which was freaking quick. Not saying this about OP, but a lot of guys go from a stock liner and think "oh i want a 10 second car hepa derpa" without knowing how quick it really is.

Also on the street a 10sec car isn't really a 10sec car... Unless it's a GTR :)

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've done this both ways, I'd use the original loom & swap plugs on the engine side as you'll usually end up changing a lot of those anyway. Series 1 is usually non ABS which requires wiring which I can't remember how to do as haven't done it for over 15 years. The auto inhibitor is easy to bypass or in the meantime you can put it in neutral & unbolt it & tape it somewhere in the bay haha, then just wire reverse lights. I'd go straight to aftermarket ecu. A few basics are built in ignitor coils & reverse the CAS wiring, sort the plugs for whatever injectors & IAC-you can use an adaptor for the neo type otherwise the s1 will still work, use the knock sensors that suit the loom & it'll be pretty much running.  
    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
×
×
  • Create New...